Literature DB >> 17564814

Emergency physicians' pain judgments: cluster analyses on scenarios of acute abdominal pain.

Laetitia Marquié1, Paul C Sorum, Etienne Mullet.   

Abstract

Physicians have been found to give lower ratings of patients' pain than do the patients themselves. We hypothesized that the physicians' rating depends not only on the patient's pain rating but also on other cues. We also hypothesized that these cues influence physicians' pain treatment and urgency level. We gave to 52 emergency room physicians in Toulouse, France, 45 scenarios describing patients with acute abdominal pain, representing all combinations of 5 levels of patient's pain rating, 3 levels of behavioral manifestations of pain, and three signs of the severity of the abdominal pathology (namely, the likelihood of appendicitis). The participants rated the patient's pain, selected the intensity of pain treatment, and judged the degree of urgency of calling in a surgeon. In rating pain, physicians took into account the patient's rating, behavioral manifestations of pain, and the signs of abdominal pathology. Clusters analyses showed two sets of individual differences. When rating pain and choosing pain treatment, physicians gave either a low or high weight to behavioral pain cues. In urgency judgments, physicians could be separated into those who gave considerable weight to the different levels of severity and those who did not.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17564814     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-007-9228-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  15 in total

Review 1.  Written case simulations: do they predict physicians' behavior?

Authors:  T V Jones; M S Gerrity; J Earp
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 2.  Nurses' knowledge of pain assessment and management: how much progress have we made?

Authors:  M McCaffery; B R Ferrell
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  Pain rating by patients and physicians: evidence of systematic pain miscalibration.

Authors:  Laetitia Marquié; Eric Raufaste; Dominique Lauque; Claudette Mariné; Marie Ecoiffier; Paul Sorum
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods.

Authors:  Mark P Jensen; Paul Karoly; Sanford Braver
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Patient and physician agreement on abdominal pain severity and need for opioid analgesia.

Authors:  S H Thomas; P Borczuk; J Shackelford; J Ostrander; D Silver; M Evans; J Stein
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.469

6.  The effects of medical evidence and pain intensity on medical student judgments of chronic pain patients.

Authors:  J T Chibnall; R C Tait; L R Ross
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1997-06

7.  Physician and patient factors influencing the treatment of low back pain.

Authors:  Joel M Bartfield; Richard F Salluzzo; Nancy Raccio-Robak; Deborah L Funk; Vincent P Verdile
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality.

Authors:  J W Peabody; J Luck; P Glassman; T R Dresselhaus; M Lee
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-04-05       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Evidence-based assessment of acute pain in older adults: current nursing practices and perceived barriers.

Authors:  Keela Herr; Marita G Titler; Margo L Schilling; J Lawrence Marsh; Xianjin Xie; Gail Ardery; William R Clarke; Linda Q Everett
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.442

10.  Pain and cognitive status in the institutionalized elderly: perceptions & interventions.

Authors:  S Kaasalainen; J Middleton; S Knezacek; T Hartley; N Stewart; C Ife; L Robinson
Journal:  J Gerontol Nurs       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.254

View more
  2 in total

1.  Taking into account the observers' uncertainty: a graduated approach to the credibility of the patient's pain evaluation.

Authors:  Patrice Rusconi; Paolo Riva; Paolo Cherubini; Lorenzo Montali
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2009-11-07

2.  Medical Evidence Influence on Inpatients and Nurses Pain Ratings Agreement.

Authors:  Boaz Gedaliahu Samolsky Dekel; Alberto Gori; Alessio Vasarri; Maria Cristina Sorella; Gianfranco Di Nino; Rita Maria Melotti
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.037

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.