Literature DB >> 17563234

More accurate size contrast judgments in the Ebbinghaus Illusion by a remote culture.

Jan de Fockert1, Jules Davidoff, Joel Fagot, Carole Parron, Julie Goldstein.   

Abstract

The Ebbinghaus (Titchener) illusion was examined in a remote culture (Himba) with no words for geometric shapes. The illusion was experienced less strongly by Himba compared with English participants, leading to more accurate size contrast judgments in the Himba. The study included two conditions of inducing stimuli. The illusion was weaker when the inducing stimuli were dissimilar (diamonds) to the target (circle) compared with when they were similar (circles). However, the illusion was weakened to the same extent in both cultures. It is argued that the more accurate size judgments of the Himba derive from their tendency to prioritize the analysis of local details in visual processing of multiple objects, and not from their impoverished naming.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17563234     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.3.738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  18 in total

1.  Effects of visual expertise on a novel eye-size illusion: implications for holistic face processing.

Authors:  Genyue Fu; Yan Dong; Paul C Quinn; Wen S Xiao; Qiandong Wang; Guowei Chen; Olivier Pascalis; Kang Lee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Why do animals differ in their susceptibility to geometrical illusions?

Authors:  Lynna C Feng; Philippe A Chouinard; Tiffani J Howell; Pauleen C Bennett
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

3.  Perception of contextual size illusions by honeybees in restricted and unrestricted viewing conditions.

Authors:  Scarlett R Howard; Aurore Avarguès-Weber; Jair E Garcia; Devi Stuart-Fox; Adrian G Dyer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Beyond modularisation: the need of a socio-neuro-constructionist model of autism.

Authors:  Beatriz López
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2015-01

5.  N170 face specificity and face memory depend on hometown size.

Authors:  Benjamin Balas; Alyson Saville
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Distinct Contributions of Genes and Environment to Visual Size Illusion and the Underlying Neural Mechanism.

Authors:  Lihong Chen; Qian Xu; Li Shen; Tian Yuan; Ying Wang; Wen Zhou; Yi Jiang
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 7.  A review on various explanations of Ponzo-like illusions.

Authors:  Gizem Y Yildiz; Irene Sperandio; Christine Kettle; Philippe A Chouinard
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-10-06

8.  A new illusion of height and width: taller people are perceived as thinner.

Authors:  Diane M Beck; Barbara Emanuele; Silvia Savazzi
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

9.  Do you see what I see? A comparative investigation of the Delboeuf illusion in humans (Homo sapiens), rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Audrey E Parrish; Sarah F Brosnan; Michael J Beran
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 2.478

10.  The surface area of human V1 predicts the subjective experience of object size.

Authors:  D Samuel Schwarzkopf; Chen Song; Geraint Rees
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-05       Impact factor: 24.884

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.