Literature DB >> 25659502

N170 face specificity and face memory depend on hometown size.

Benjamin Balas1, Alyson Saville2.   

Abstract

Face recognition depends on visual experience in a number of different ways. Infrequent exposure to faces belonging to categories defined by species, age, or race can lead to diminished memory for and discrimination between members of those categories relative to faces belonging to categories that dominate an observer's environment. Early visual impairment can also have long-lasting and broad effects on face discrimination - just a few months of visual impairment due to congenital cataracts can lead to diminished discrimination between faces that differ in their configuration, for example (Le Grand et al., 2001). Presently, we consider a novel aspect of visual experience that may impact face recognition: The approximate amount of different faces observers encountered during their childhood. We recruited undergraduate observers from small (500-1000 individuals) and large communities (30,000-100,000 individuals) and asked them to complete a standard face memory test and a basic ERP paradigm designed to elicit a robust N170 response, including the classic face inversion effect. We predicted that growing up in a small community might lead to diminished face memory and an N170 response that was less specific to faces. These predictions were confirmed, suggesting that the sheer number of faces one can interact with during their upbringing shapes their behavioral abilities and the functional architecture of face processing in the brain.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Event-related potentials; Face perception; Perceptual expertise

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25659502      PMCID: PMC4353480          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  37 in total

1.  The role of age and ethnic group in face recognition memory: ERP evidence from a combined own-age and own-race bias study.

Authors:  Holger Wiese
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.251

2.  Other-race and inversion effects during the structural encoding stage of face processing in a race categorization task: an event-related brain potential study.

Authors:  Stéphanie Caharel; Benoît Montalan; Emilie Fromager; Christian Bernard; Robert Lalonde; Rebaï Mohamed
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 2.997

3.  EEG correlates of categorical and graded face perception.

Authors:  Margaret C Moulson; Benjamin Balas; Charles Nelson; Pawan Sinha
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Representation of shape in individuals from a culture with minimal exposure to regular, simple artifacts: sensitivity to nonaccidental versus metric properties.

Authors:  Irving Biederman; Xiaomin Yue; Jules Davidoff
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-10-30

5.  Training with own-race faces can improve processing of other-race faces: evidence from developmental prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Joseph DeGutis; Christopher DeNicola; Tyler Zink; Regina McGlinchey; William Milberg
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Holistic processing predicts face recognition.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Olivia S Cheung; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-03-10

7.  The role of face shape and pigmentation in other-race face perception: an electrophysiological study.

Authors:  Benjamin Balas; Charles A Nelson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Early experience predicts later plasticity for face processing: evidence for the reactivation of dormant effects.

Authors:  Viola Macchi Cassia; Dana Kuefner; Marta Picozzi; Elena Vescovo
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-06-01

9.  The effects of early experience on face recognition: an event-related potential study of institutionalized children in Romania.

Authors:  Margaret C Moulson; Alissa Westerlund; Nathan A Fox; Charles H Zeanah; Charles A Nelson
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug

10.  I spy with my little eye: typical, daily exposure to faces documented from a first-person infant perspective.

Authors:  Nicole A Sugden; Marwan I Mohamed-Ali; Margaret C Moulson
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.038

View more
  7 in total

1.  Eyeglasses elicit effects similar to face-like perceptual expertise: evidence from the N170 response.

Authors:  Xiaohua Cao; Qi Yang; Fengpei Hu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Face perception: A brief journey through recent discoveries and current directions.

Authors:  Ipek Oruc; Benjamin Balas; Michael S Landy
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Hometown size affects the processing of naturalistic face variability.

Authors:  Benjamin Balas; Alyson Saville
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  Is human face recognition lateralized to the right hemisphere due to neural competition with left-lateralized visual word recognition? A critical review.

Authors:  Bruno Rossion; Aliette Lochy
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 3.270

5.  The Faces in Infant-Perspective Scenes Change over the First Year of Life.

Authors:  Swapnaa Jayaraman; Caitlin M Fausey; Linda B Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Memory and Perception-based Facial Image Reconstruction.

Authors:  Chi-Hsun Chang; Dan Nemrodov; Andy C H Lee; Adrian Nestor
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Beauty-related perceptual bias: Who captures the mind of the beholder?

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Yu Xiang; Ying Guo; Lili Zhang
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 2.708

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.