Literature DB >> 17563178

Overriding age differences in attentional capture with top-down processing.

Wythe L Whiting1, David J Madden, Katherine J Babcock.   

Abstract

Two experiments investigated the influence of top-down information on adult age differences in the ability to search for singleton targets using spatial cues. In Experiment 1, both younger and older adults were equally able to use target-related top-down information (target feature predictability) to avoid attentional capture by uninformative (25% valid) cues. However, during informative (75% valid) cue conditions, older adults demonstrated less efficient use of this cue-related top-down information. The authors extended these findings in Experiment 2 using cues that were either consistent or inconsistent with top-down feature settings. Results from this second experiment showed that although older adults were capable of avoiding attentional capture when provided with top-down information related to target features, capture effects for older adults were notably larger than those of younger adults when only bottom-up information was available. The authors suggest that older adults' ability to use top-down information during search to avoid or attend to cues may be resource-limited. ((c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17563178      PMCID: PMC1925039          DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.22.2.223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Aging        ISSN: 0882-7974


  25 in total

1.  Age differences in the control of looking behavior: do you know where your eyes have been?

Authors:  A F Kramer; S Hahn; D E Irwin; J Theeuwes
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-05

2.  On the strategic modulation of the time course of facilitation and inhibition of return.

Authors:  J Lupiáñez; B Milliken; C Solano; B Weaver; S P Tipper
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2001-08

3.  Top-down contingencies in peripheral cuing: The roles of color and location.

Authors:  Ulrich Ansorge; Manfred Heumann
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Adult age differences in attentional allocation during memory search.

Authors:  D J Madden; T W Pierce; P A Allen
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1992-12

5.  Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-02

6.  Age-related preservation of top-down attentional guidance during visual search.

Authors:  David J Madden; Wythe L Whiting; Roberto Cabeza; Scott A Huettel
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2004-06

7.  Item- and task-level processes in the left inferior prefrontal cortex: positive and negative correlates of encoding.

Authors:  Jeremy R Reynolds; David I Donaldson; Anthony D Wagner; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Visual marking: prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects.

Authors:  D G Watson; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Automatic and voluntary control of attention in young and older adults.

Authors:  J F Juola; H Koshino; C B Warner; M McMickell; M Peterson
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  2000

10.  Aging and Visual Attention.

Authors:  David J Madden
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-04
View more
  9 in total

1.  Age-related and individual differences in the use of prediction during language comprehension.

Authors:  Kara D Federmeier; Marta Kutas; Rina Schul
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Eye movements and strategy shift in skill acquisition: adult age differences.

Authors:  Dayna R Touron; Christopher Hertzog; David Frank
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 4.077

3.  A search-by-clusters model of visual search: fits to data from younger and older adults.

Authors:  William J Hoyer; John Cerella; Norbou G Buchler
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 4.077

4.  Visual Acuity does not Moderate Effect Sizes of Higher-Level Cognitive Tasks.

Authors:  James R Houston; Ilana J Bennett; Philip A Allen; David J Madden
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.645

5.  Age-related preservation of top-down control over distraction in visual search.

Authors:  Matthew C Costello; David J Madden; Anne M Shepler; Stephen R Mitroff; Andrew B Leber
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.645

6.  Age differences in vulnerability to distraction under arousal.

Authors:  Sara N Gallant; Kelly A Durbin; Mara Mather
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2020-08

7.  Response-specific slowing in older age revealed through differential stimulus and response effects on P300 latency and reaction time.

Authors:  Theodore R Bashore; Scott A Wylie; K Richard Ridderinkhof; Jacques M Martinerie
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2013-11-06

8.  Age mediation of frontoparietal activation during visual feature search.

Authors:  David J Madden; Emily L Parks; Simon W Davis; Michele T Diaz; Guy G Potter; Ying-hui Chou; Nan-kuei Chen; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Selective control of attention supports the positivity effect in aging.

Authors:  Laura K Sasse; Matthias Gamer; Christian Büchel; Stefanie Brassen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.