Literature DB >> 17563109

The psychometric properties of the PRAFAB-questionnaire: a brief assessment questionnaire to evaluate severity of urinary incontinence in women.

Erik J M Hendriks1, Arnold T M Bernards, Bary C M Berghmans, Rob A de Bie.   

Abstract

AIMS: To determine the psychometric properties of the (5-item) total PRAFAB-questionnaire score in a group of patients with stress or predominant urgency urinary incontinence (UI) to justify its use in clinical practice and research.
METHODS: Psychometric properties were assessed in a prospective cohort of patients with primary or recurrent UI referred for physiotherapy treatment.
RESULTS: In total, 99 women enrolled the cohort study, of whom 87 were classified as stable ("about the same" on the global rating scale [GRS]) and included for analyses. Factor analysis resulted in a single underlying factor in both UI groups. The PRAFAB-questionnaire scores demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability (high ICCsagreement [0.93-0.95] and kappa scores for individual items) and excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha's of 0.82). The PRAFAB-questionnaire was able to discriminate among different patient groups indicating good construct validity. Responsiveness to clinical improvement for both groups was shown to be excellent with large effect size statistics and high correlations (0.79-0.89) with patients' perceived benefit on the GRS indicating excellent longitudinal validity. The minimally important change stratified for non-severe and severe classified patients were estimated between -2.5 to -4.6 and -4.5 to -7.0 points, respectively for the stress UI group and -2.5 to -3.4 points and -4.0 to -4.4, respectively for the urgency UI group.
CONCLUSIONS: The brief and simple PRAFAB-questionnaire demonstrated good psychometric properties for use in clinical practice and research to evaluate treatment effects for UI in women. Future research will be necessary to replicate these findings and further explore its psychometric properties. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17563109     DOI: 10.1002/nau.20450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn        ISSN: 0733-2467            Impact factor:   2.696


  9 in total

1.  Responsiveness and interpretability of incontinence severity scores and FIQL in patients with fecal incontinence: a secondary analysis from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  E M J Bols; H J M Hendriks; L C M Berghmans; C G M I Baeten; R A de Bie
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Validated instruments in the evaluation and treatment outcomes of stress urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  Gjanjé L Smith; Kathleen C Kobashi
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Validation of the Prolapse Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (P-QoL) in Portuguese version in Brazilian women.

Authors:  Márcia Silva de Oliveira; José Tadeu Nunes Tamanini; Geraldo de Aguiar Cavalcanti
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-07-04

4.  Validation of the Polish version of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire.

Authors:  Magdalena Emilia Grzybowska; Dariusz Grzegorz Wydra; Jerzy Smutek
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Predictive factors of urinary tract infections among the oldest old in the general population. A population-based prospective follow-up study.

Authors:  Monique A A Caljouw; Wendy P J den Elzen; Herman J M Cools; Jacobijn Gussekloo
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 8.775

6.  Physiotherapy assessment for female urinary incontinence.

Authors:  B Berghmans; M R Seleme; A T M Bernards
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  A randomized physiotherapy trial in patients with fecal incontinence: design of the PhysioFIT-study.

Authors:  Esther M J Bols; Bary C M Berghmans; Erik J M Hendriks; Rob A de Bie; Jarno Melenhorst; Wim G van Gemert; Cor G M I Baeten
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Factorial validity and internal consistency of the PRAFAB questionnaire in women with stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Erik J M Hendriks; Arnold T M Bernards; J Bart Staal; Henrica C W de Vet; Rob A de Bie
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2008-01-24       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 9.  Dutch guidelines for physiotherapy in patients with stress urinary incontinence: an update.

Authors:  Arnold T M Bernards; Bary C M Berghmans; Marijke C Ph Slieker-Ten Hove; J Bart Staal; Rob A de Bie; Erik J M Hendriks
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 2.894

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.