Literature DB >> 1756272

Prognostic value of total cathepsin D in breast tumors. A possible role in selection of chemoresistant patients.

M Namer1, A Ramaioli, X Fontana, M C Etienne, M Héry, A Jourlait, G Milano, M Frenay, E François, F Lapalus.   

Abstract

Evaluation of prognostic factors for breast cancers is important for therapeutic decisions both at the time of surgery and during postoperative surveillance. In 1979, H. Rochefort described an induced protein with a molecular weight of 52,000 Daltons identified as procathepsin D. Total cathepsin D (TCD) (52K + 48K + 34K), expressed in pmol/mg protein, can be measured by an immunoradiometric method commercialized by Cis-Biointernational. Total cathepsin D was assayed in 413 breast cancer tumors from patients who underwent surgery between January 1, 1978, and December 31, 1985. Using a cut-off of 35 pmol/mg protein, patients with an elevated level had a significantly poorer survival than those with a low level (p = 0.03). This difference was not found for node-negative patients but was very significant for node-positive patients (p less than 0.008). The survival of node-positive patients with a low total cathepsin level was not statistically different from that of node-negative patients. Analysis of the N+ subgroup of patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy revealed that TCD no longer had any prognostic value, whereas it was still important for the N+ subgroup who received an adjuvant treatment. Cox multivariate analysis of prognostic value for survival placed total cathepsin D in third position, after nodal invasion and progesterone receptor status, for the entire population, and in first position before progesterone receptor status for the node-positive population. The association of a low cathepsin level and positive progesterone receptors characterized the subgroup of patients with the longest survival. TCD levels played the same role for prediction of the outcome of metastasis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1756272     DOI: 10.1007/bf01980938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  13 in total

1.  Impact of flow cytometry on predicting recurrence and survival in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  W l McGuire; J S Meyer; B Barlogie; T E Kute
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding.

Authors:  M M Bradford
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1976-05-07       Impact factor: 3.365

3.  Cathepsin D: an independent prognostic factor for metastasis of breast cancer.

Authors:  F Spyratos; T Maudelonde; J P Brouillet; M Brunet; A Defrenne; C Andrieu; K Hacene; A Desplaces; J Rouëssé; H Rochefort
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-11-11       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  Estrogen-induced lysosomal proteases secreted by breast cancer cells: a role in carcinogenesis?

Authors:  H Rochefort; F Capony; M Garcia; V Cavaillès; G Freiss; M Chambon; M Morisset; F Vignon
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 4.429

Review 5.  Cathepsin D in breast cancer.

Authors:  H Rochefort
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  HER-2/neu oncogene protein and prognosis in breast cancer.

Authors:  A K Tandon; G M Clark; G C Chamness; A Ullrich; W L McGuire
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Prognostic implication of labeling index versus estrogen receptors and tumor size in node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  R Silvestrini; M G Daidone; G Di Fronzo; A Morabito; P Valagussa; G Bonadonna
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Patterns of relapse and survival following radical mastectomy. Analysis of 716 consecutive patients.

Authors:  P Valagussa; G Bonadonna; U Veronesi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Association between high concentrations of Mr 52,000 cathepsin D and poor prognosis in primary human breast cancer.

Authors:  S M Thorpe; H Rochefort; M Garcia; G Freiss; I J Christensen; S Khalaf; F Paolucci; B Pau; B B Rasmussen; C Rose
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1989-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Histological grading and prognosis in breast cancer; a study of 1409 cases of which 359 have been followed for 15 years.

Authors:  H J BLOOM; W W RICHARDSON
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1957-09       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic factors in node-negative breast cancer: a review of studies with sample size more than 200 and follow-up more than 5 years.

Authors:  Attiqa N Mirza; Nadeem Q Mirza; Georges Vlastos; S Eva Singletary
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Cathepsin D detected by automated and quantitative immunohistochemistry in breast carcinomas: correlation with overall and disease free survival.

Authors:  C Charpin; S Garcia; C Bouvier; F Martini; M Lavaut; C Allasia; P Bonnier; L Andrac
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Western immunoblotting and enzymatic activity analysis of cathepsin D in human breast cancer cell lines of different invasive potential. Regulation by 17beta-estradiol, tamoxifen and ICI 182,780.

Authors:  D Couissi; V Dubois; C Remacle; E Schonne; A Trouet
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.150

4.  Prognostic value of cathepsin D in breast cancer: comparison of immunohistochemical and immunoradiometric detection methods.

Authors:  U J Göhring; A Scharl; U Thelen; A Ahr; G Crombach; B R Titius
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Comparative biochemical and immunohistochemical studies on the cathepsin D content of human breast cancer.

Authors:  W Remmele; J Sauer-Manthey
Journal:  Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol       Date:  1993

Review 6.  Evaluation of cathepsin D as a prognostic factor in breast cancer.

Authors:  P M Ravdin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Relationship between cathepsin-D content and disease-free survival in node-negative breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  G Ferrandina; G Scambia; F Bardelli; P Benedetti Panici; S Mancuso; A Messori
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) is not related to response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  J Y Pierga; C Lainé-Bidron; P Beuzeboc; P De Crémoux; P Pouillart; H Magdelénat
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Response to adjuvant chemotherapy in primary breast cancer: no correlation with expression of glutathione S-transferases.

Authors:  W H Peters; H M Roelofs; W L van Putten; J B Jansen; J G Klijn; J A Foekens
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Stromal cell cathepsin D expression and long-term survival in breast cancer.

Authors:  H Joensuu; S Toikkanen; J Isola
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.