Literature DB >> 3779114

Prognostic implication of labeling index versus estrogen receptors and tumor size in node-negative breast cancer.

R Silvestrini, M G Daidone, G Di Fronzo, A Morabito, P Valagussa, G Bonadonna.   

Abstract

The paper analyzes the relation among tumor size (T), estrogen receptor (ER) status, and labeling index (LI) and their relative merits in predicting the relapse-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in 215 node-negative women with primary breast cancer. All patients were subjected to Halsted or modified radical mastectomy; none received postoperative irradiation or systemic adjuvant therapy. The 5-year RFS was 75.3% and OS 89.0%. When singly tested, LI and ER were able to significantly predict RFS and OS. In contrast, T influenced only RFS but not OS. The multivariate analysis showed that, in the presence of the two other variables, only LI retained its prognostic significance both for time to relapse (p = 0.0044) and survival (p = 0.035). From the present findings, LI appears to be a new important prognostic variable in the selection of high risk patients for whom adjuvant systemic therapy should perhaps be part of their primary treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3779114     DOI: 10.1007/bf01806246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  24 in total

1.  Standards for the assessment of estrogen receptors in human breast cancer. Report of a workshop on September 29, 1972, at the Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Huis, Amsterdam.

Authors: 
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  Ten year follow-up results of patients with carcinoma of the breast in a co-operative clinical trial evaluating surgical adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  B Fisher; N Slack; D Katrych; N Wolmark
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1975-04

3.  Estrogen receptors and long-term prognosis in breast cancer.

Authors:  S Aamdal; O Børmer; O Jørgensen; H Høst; G Eliassen; O Kaalhus; A Pihl
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1984-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Cell proliferation and its relationship to clinical features and relapse in breast cancers.

Authors:  C Gentili; O Sanfilippo; R Silvestrini
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1981-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Prognostic significance of estrogen receptor status in breast cancer in relation to tumor stage, axillary node metastasis, and histopathologic grading.

Authors:  F F Parl; B P Schmidt; W D Dupont; R K Wagner
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1984-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Prediction of early course of breast carcinoma by thymidine labeling.

Authors:  J S Meyer; E Friedman; M M McCrate; W C Bauer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1983-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Prognostic implication of estrogen receptor content in breast cancer.

Authors:  H O Adami; S Graffman; A Lindgren; J Sällström
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Cell kinetics as a prognostic marker in node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  R Silvestrini; M G Daidone; G Gasparini
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1985-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Patterns of relapse and survival following radical mastectomy. Analysis of 716 consecutive patients.

Authors:  P Valagussa; G Bonadonna; U Veronesi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. analysis and examples.

Authors:  R Peto; M C Pike; P Armitage; N E Breslow; D R Cox; S V Howard; N Mantel; K McPherson; J Peto; P G Smith
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  26 in total

1.  Has adjuvant treatment of breast cancer had an unfair trial?

Authors:  I Mittra
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-12-08

Review 2.  Node negative breast cancer.

Authors:  S M O'Reilly; M A Richards
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-02-10

3.  Prognostic factors and natural history in lymph node-negative breast cancer patients.

Authors:  R Arriagada; L E Rutqvist; L Skoog; H Johansson; A Kramar
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Relationship between c-erbB-2 immunoreactivity and thymidine labelling index in breast carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  D M Barnes; J S Meyer; J G Gonzalez; W J Gullick; R R Millis
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Biological indices in the assessment of breast cancer.

Authors:  A S Leong; A K Lee
Journal:  Clin Mol Pathol       Date:  1995-10

6.  Proliferation of normal breast epithelial cells as shown by in vivo labeling with bromodeoxyuridine.

Authors:  K Christov; K L Chew; B M Ljung; F M Waldman; L A Duarte; W H Goodson; H S Smith; B H Mayall
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.307

7.  Proliferating cell nuclear antigen in breast lesions: correlation of c-erbB-2 oncoprotein and EGF receptor and its clinicopathological significance in breast cancer.

Authors:  P Shrestha; K Yamada; T Wada; S Maeda; M Watatani; M Yasutomi; H Takagi; M Mori
Journal:  Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol       Date:  1992

8.  Proliferative index of breast carcinoma by thymidine labeling: prognostic power independent of stage, estrogen and progesterone receptors.

Authors:  J S Meyer; M Province
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Prognostic factors for recurrence and survival in human breast cancer.

Authors:  W L McGuire
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 10.  Response to treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  J L Berenberg
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.