Literature DB >> 17562403

Comparison of immediate postoperative walking ability in patients receiving minimally invasive and standard-incision hip arthroplasty: a prospective blinded study.

Damien Bennett1, Luke Ogonda, David Elliott, Lee Humphreys, Marie Lawlor, David Beverland.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive hip arthroplasty is thought to result in less soft tissue damage, earlier ambulation, and improved rehabilitation. This prospective blinded cohort study objectively analyzed early functional walking ability by stride analysis 2 days postoperatively. Ninety-five patients were analyzed, 43 of who received the minimal incision and 52 the traditional incision. Patients, physiotherapists, and assessors were blinded to the incision used. Velocity, cadence, stride length, operated and nonoperated limb step-length, and the ratio of step length of the operated to nonoperated limbs were recorded. No significant differences in any of these variables were shown between the minimal-incision and traditional-incision groups. This study demonstrates no functional benefits of the minimally invasive incision over the standard one in terms of early walking ability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17562403     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.02.173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  15 in total

Review 1.  What is the role of minimally invasive surgery in a fast track hip and knee replacement pathway?

Authors:  J M Lloyd; T Wainwright; R G Middleton
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  Minimally invasive versus conventional exposure for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes.

Authors:  Toby O Smith; Vicky Blake; Caroline B Hing
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Comments on Smith et al.: minimally invasive versus conventional exposure for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes.

Authors:  Riaz J K Khan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  No strength or gait benefit of two-incision THA: a brief followup at 1 year.

Authors:  Aaron J Krych; Mark W Pagnano; Krista Coleman Wood; R Michael Meneghini; Kenton Kaufman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  [Surgical approaches in hip resurfacing].

Authors:  L Gerdesmeyer; H Gollwitzer; R Bader; M Rudert
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 6.  [Postoperative complications in trauma surgery].

Authors:  C Josten; C Schmidt
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Reduced postoperative pain in total hip arthroplasty after minimal-invasive anterior approach.

Authors:  Sascha Goebel; Andre F Steinert; Judith Schillinger; Jochen Eulert; Jens Broscheit; Maximilian Rudert; Ulrich Nöth
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Comparison of minimally invasive approach versus conventional anterolateral approach for total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  T Repantis; T Bouras; P Korovessis
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-02-21

9.  Pilates training for use in rehabilitation after total hip and knee arthroplasty: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Brett Levine; Beth Kaplanek; William L Jaffe
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Temporospatial parameters of hip replacement patients ten years post-operatively.

Authors:  D Bennett; L Humphreys; S O'Brien; J Orr; D E Beverland
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.