Literature DB >> 17562035

Effect of finger tracking combined with electrical stimulation on brain reorganization and hand function in subjects with stroke.

Ela Bhatt1, Ashima Nagpal, Kristine H Greer, Tiffany K Grunewald, Jennifer L Steele, Jeff W Wiemiller, Scott M Lewis, James R Carey.   

Abstract

Synergism of rehabilitative interventions could maximize recovery following stroke. We examined whether the combination of peripherally initiated electrical stimulation of finger extensors and centrally operating finger tracking training could accentuate brain reorganization and its relationship to recovery, beyond the effects of either treatment alone. Twenty subjects with stroke were randomly assigned to an electrical stimulation (ES), tracking training (TR) or combination (CM) group. Each group was trained for ten 1-h sessions over 2-3 weeks. Pretest and posttest measurements consisted of the Box and Block and Jebsen Taylor tests of manual dexterity and a finger tracking test that was performed during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). fMRI variables included laterality index and BOLD signal intensity of primary motor (M1), primary sensory (S1), sensorimotor (SMC) and premotor (PMC) cortices as well as, supplementary motor area (SMA). ES and CM groups improved on dexterity, whereas the TR group did not. Improvement in the CM group was not greater than the other two groups. Subjects who had an intact M1 showed greater functional improvement than those who had direct involvement of M1. fMRI analysis did not yield significant changes from pretest to posttest. In the CM group only, functional improvement was positively correlated with laterality index change in M1, S1, SMC and PMC, indicating greater ipsilesional control and was negatively correlated with BOLD Signal Intensity change in ipsilesional S1 and SMA, indicating neurophysiological trimming of irrelevant neurons. The correlational results suggest that the combined intervention may be more influential on brain reorganization than either treatment alone but a larger sample size, longer duration of training, or a restricted inclusion of stroke location and volume may be needed to demonstrate a difference in efficacy for producing behavioral changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17562035     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1001-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  71 in total

1.  Reduction in subluxation and improved muscle function of the hemiplegic shoulder joint after therapeutic electrical stimulation.

Authors:  H Kobayashi; H Onishi; K Ihashi; R Yagi; Y Handa
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.368

Review 2.  Plasticity and primary motor cortex.

Authors:  J N Sanes; J P Donoghue
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 12.449

3.  Statistical properties of BOLD magnetic resonance activity in the human brain.

Authors:  Chien-Chung Chen; Christopher W Tyler; Heidi A Baseler
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Increased cortical excitability induced by transcranial DC and peripheral nerve stimulation.

Authors:  J Uy; M C Ridding
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Functional brain asymmetries during visuomotor tracking.

Authors:  Gregory G Brown; Michael Caligiuri; M J Meloy; Sonya C Eberson; Sandra S Kindermann; Larry R Frank; Lisa T Eyler Zorrilla; James B Lohr
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.475

6.  Support for an explanation of the guidance effect in motor skill learning.

Authors:  D I Anderson; R A Magill; H Sekiya; G Ryan
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.328

7.  Differences between the effects of three plasticity inducing protocols on the organization of the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Karin Rosenkranz; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  An objective and standardized test of hand function.

Authors:  R H Jebsen; N Taylor; R B Trieschmann; M J Trotter; L A Howard
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  A functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparetic stroke.

Authors:  S C Cramer; G Nelles; R R Benson; J D Kaplan; R A Parker; K K Kwong; D N Kennedy; S P Finklestein; B R Rosen
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Stimulus-response compatibility effects in a manual tracking task.

Authors:  J R Carey; C L Bogard; J W Youdas; V J Suman
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1995-12
View more
  27 in total

1.  Both sleep and wakefulness support consolidation of continuous, goal-directed, visuomotor skill.

Authors:  Michael R Borich; Teresa Jacobson Kimberley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  rTMS combined with motor training changed the inter-hemispheric lateralization.

Authors:  Jing-Na Jin; Xin Wang; Ying Li; He Wang; Zhi-Peng Liu; Tao Yin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Combined effect of motor imagery and peripheral nerve electrical stimulation on the motor cortex.

Authors:  Kei Saito; Tomofumi Yamaguchi; Naoshin Yoshida; Shigeo Tanabe; Kunitsugu Kondo; Kenichi Sugawara
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Stimulation targeting higher motor areas in stroke rehabilitation: A proof-of-concept, randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled study of effectiveness and underlying mechanisms.

Authors:  David A Cunningham; Nicole Varnerin; Andre Machado; Corin Bonnett; Daniel Janini; Sarah Roelle; Kelsey Potter-Baker; Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; Xiaofeng Wang; Guang Yue; Ela B Plow
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.406

5.  Rethinking stimulation of the brain in stroke rehabilitation: why higher motor areas might be better alternatives for patients with greater impairments.

Authors:  Ela B Plow; David A Cunningham; Nicole Varnerin; Andre Machado
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 7.519

Review 6.  Invasive neurostimulation in stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Ela B Plow; Andre Machado
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.620

7.  Goal-directed visuomotor skill learning: off-line enhancement and the importance of the primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Michael Borich; Mary Furlong; Dennis Holsman; Teresa Jacobson Kimberley
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 8.  Functional recovery following motor cortex lesions in non-human primates: experimental implications for human stroke patients.

Authors:  Warren G Darling; Marc A Pizzimenti; Robert J Morecraft
Journal:  J Integr Neurosci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.117

9.  Neurorehabilitation using the virtual reality based Rehabilitation Gaming System: methodology, design, psychometrics, usability and validation.

Authors:  Mónica S Cameirão; Sergi Bermúdez I Badia; Esther Duarte Oller; Paul F M J Verschure
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 10.  Invasive cortical stimulation to promote recovery of function after stroke: a critical appraisal.

Authors:  Ela B Plow; James R Carey; Randolph J Nudo; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 7.914

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.