Literature DB >> 15883120

Support for an explanation of the guidance effect in motor skill learning.

D I Anderson1, R A Magill, H Sekiya, G Ryan.   

Abstract

The authors investigated whether the knowledge of results (KR) schedule influences the extent to which intrinsic feedback is noticed and used. Fifty-six participants received KR that was either delayed over 2 trials (Delay-2) or provided directly after each trial (Delay-0) during 160 trials of an unfamiliar aiming task. No-KR retention tests were given after 80 trials and 1 min and 24 hr after the end of acquisition. After retention, all participants were questioned about their use of intrinsic feedback during practice and whether those sources changed as a function of practice. The Delay-2 group performed significantly less accurately on the 1st and last blocks of acquisition trials but showed a significantly smaller performance decline from acquisition to retention. Moreover, the Delay-2 group noticed and used a greater variety of intrinsic feedback sources and its members were more likely to report that their usage changed with practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15883120      PMCID: PMC1780106          DOI: 10.3200/JMBR.37.3.231-238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  16 in total

1.  Motor learning as a function of KR schedule and characteristics of task-intrinsic feedback.

Authors:  D I Anderson; R A Magill; H Sekiya
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  The discrimination, acquisition, and retention of aiming movements made with and without elastic resistance.

Authors:  D I Anderson
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.888

3.  THE EFFECT OF ONE-TRIAL DELAY IN KNOWLEDGE OF RESULTS ON THE ACQUISITION AND RETENTION OF A TOSSING SKILL.

Authors:  J J LAVERY
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1964-09

4.  Accuracy of positioning responses as a function of spring loading in a control.

Authors:  H P BAHRICK; W F BENNETT; P M FITTS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1955-06

5.  What is missing in p less than .05? Effect size.

Authors:  J R Thomas; W Salazar; D M Landers
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.500

6.  Optimal length for summary knowledge of results: the influence of task-related experience and complexity.

Authors:  M A Guadagnoli; L A Dornier; R D Tandy
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 7.  More on assessing the retention of motor learning based on restricted information.

Authors:  R W Christina; J B Shea
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.500

8.  A reconsideration of the trials-delay of knowledge of results paradigm in motor skill learning.

Authors:  D I Anderson; R A Magill; H Sekiya
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 9.  Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical reappraisal.

Authors:  A W Salmoni; R A Schmidt; C B Walter
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  The relationship between types of feedback, gain of a display and feedback precision in acquisition of a simple motor task.

Authors:  J Patrick; F Mutlusoy
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1982-02
View more
  13 in total

1.  Effect of finger tracking combined with electrical stimulation on brain reorganization and hand function in subjects with stroke.

Authors:  Ela Bhatt; Ashima Nagpal; Kristine H Greer; Tiffany K Grunewald; Jennifer L Steele; Jeff W Wiemiller; Scott M Lewis; James R Carey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Outcome errors are not necessary for learning orthopedic bone drilling.

Authors:  Mykola Khokhotva; David Backstein; Adam Dubrowski
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Using a Multifaceted Approach to Working With Children Who Have Differences in Sensory Processing and Integration.

Authors:  Stacey Reynolds; Tara J Glennon; Karla Ausderau; Roxanna M Bendixen; Heather Miller Kuhaneck; Beth Pfeiffer; Renee Watling; Kimberly Wilkinson; Stefanie C Bodison
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr

4.  The effect of feedback schedule manipulation on speech priming patterns and reaction time.

Authors:  Dana Slocomb; Kristie A Spencer
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2008-09-12

5.  Pilot fMRI investigation of representational plasticity associated with motor skill learning and its functional consequences.

Authors:  Ela B Plow; James R Carey
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.978

6.  Ambulatory Voice Biofeedback: Relative Frequency and Summary Feedback Effects on Performance and Retention of Reduced Vocal Intensity in the Daily Lives of Participants With Normal Voices.

Authors:  Jarrad H Van Stan; Daryush D Mehta; Dagmar Sternad; Robert Petit; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Delayed feedback during sensorimotor learning selectively disrupts adaptation but not strategy use.

Authors:  Samuel N Brudner; Nikhit Kethidi; Damaris Graeupner; Richard B Ivry; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Integration of Motor Learning Principles Into Real-Time Ambulatory Voice Biofeedback and Example Implementation Via a Clinical Case Study With Vocal Fold Nodules.

Authors:  Jarrad H Van Stan; Daryush D Mehta; Robert J Petit; Dagmar Sternad; Jason Muise; James A Burns; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.408

9.  Reliable Detection of Implicit Waveform-Specific Learning in Continuous Tracking Task Paradigm.

Authors:  Limin Yang; Feng Wan; Wenya Nan; Frank Zhu; Yong Hu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Transposing musical skill: sonification of movement as concurrent augmented feedback enhances learning in a bimanual task.

Authors:  John Dyer; Paul Stapleton; Matthew Rodger
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-05-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.