Literature DB >> 17561612

How are automatic positive airway pressure and related devices prescribed by sleep physicians? A web-based survey.

Sairam Parthasarathy1, Michael Habib, Stuart F Quan.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: The main purpose of this study was to characterize the practices of sleep physicians prescribing positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy to patients with sleep-disordered breathing. The main outcome measures were to determine the indications for initiation of PAP therapy, the type of PAP devices prescribed, and the interfaces that were commonly used and to assess the physicians' familiarity with the newer PAP devices. DESIGN AND
SETTING: An anonymous web-based survey with 20 questions aimed at determining point-prevalence estimates of physician practices and physician knowledge. PATIENTS: None.
INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: 196 physician responses (24% response rate) were analyzed. Sleep physicians reported that obstructive sleep apnea was the most common diagnosis following sleep studies, but none reported central sleep apnea as a primary diagnosis. Physicians' prescription practices for PAP therapy and their perceptions of indications and contraindications of devices varied widely. Thirty percent of sleep physicians did not prescribe auto-PAP devices, and such devices constituted only 4% of all PAP devices prescribed. While many physicians took measures to help improve compliance--such as prescribing heated humidifiers (67%)--many did not insist on compliance monitoring (49%). Physicians who interpreted more than 20 sleep studies per month were more knowledgeable regarding auto-PAP devices and were more likely to prescribe such devices (P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: Sleep physicians' practices and perceptions in prescribing PAP therapy varied widely, although the indication for prescribing PAP therapy was homogenous.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 17561612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med        ISSN: 1550-9389            Impact factor:   4.062


  7 in total

1.  CON: thoughtful steps informed by more comparative effectiveness research is needed in home testing.

Authors:  Sairam Parthasarathy
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 4.062

2.  A multicenter prospective comparative effectiveness study of the effect of physician certification and center accreditation on patient-centered outcomes in obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Sairam Parthasarathy; Shyam Subramanian; Stuart F Quan
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 4.062

3.  Advances in Positive Airway Pressure Treatment Modalities for Hypoventilation Syndromes.

Authors:  Dan Combs; Safal Shetty; Sairam Parthasarathy
Journal:  Sleep Med Clin       Date:  2014-09

4.  Effect of air leak on the performance of auto-PAP devices: a bench study.

Authors:  Dale Coller; Dawn Stanley; Sairam Parthasarathy
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.816

5.  APAP and Alternative Titration Methods.

Authors:  Omer Ahmed; Sairam Parthasarathy
Journal:  Sleep Med Clin       Date:  2010-09-01

Review 6.  CPAP and bi-level PAP therapy: new and established roles.

Authors:  Andreea Antonescu-Turcu; Sairam Parthasarathy
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.258

7.  Clinical guidelines for the manual titration of positive airway pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Clete A Kushida; Alejandro Chediak; Richard B Berry; Lee K Brown; David Gozal; Conrad Iber; Sairam Parthasarathy; Stuart F Quan; James A Rowley
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 4.062

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.