Literature DB >> 15186907

Occupational stressors and hypertension: a multi-method study using observer-based job analysis and self-reports in urban transit operators.

Birgit A Greiner1, Niklas Krause, David Ragland, June M Fisher.   

Abstract

This multi-method study aimed to disentangle objective and subjective components of job stressors and determine the role of each for hypertension risk. Because research on job stressors and hypertension has been exclusively based on self-reports of stressors, the tendency of some individuals to use denial and repressive coping might be responsible for the inconclusive results in previous studies. Stressor measures with different degrees of objectivity were contrasted, including (1) an observer-based measure of stressors (job barriers, time pressure) obtained from experts, (2) self-reported frequency and appraised intensity of job problems and time pressures averaged per workplace (group level), (3) self-reported frequency of job problems and time pressures at the individual level, and (4) self-reported appraised intensity of job problems and time pressures at the individual level. The sample consisted of 274 transit operators working on 27 different transit lines and four different vehicle types. Objective stressors (job barriers and time pressure) were each significantly associated with hypertension (casual blood pressure readings and/or currently taking anti-hypertensive medication) after adjustment for age, gender and seniority. Self-reported stressors at the individual level were positively but not significantly associated with hypertension. At the group level, only appraisal of job problems significantly predicted hypertension. In a composite regression model, both observer-based job barriers and self-reported intensity of job problems were independently and significantly associated with hypertension. Associations between self-reported job problems (individual level) and hypertension were dependent on the level of objective stressors. When observer-based stressor level was low, the association between self-reported frequency of stressors and hypertension was high. When the observer-based stressor level was high the association was inverse; this might be indicative of denial of stress or alexithymia. We feel that multi-method studies are useful for disentangling the relations between objective and subjective stress and hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15186907     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  17 in total

1.  On cross-sectional questionnaire studies of relationships between psychosocial conditions at work and health--are they reliable?

Authors:  Töres Theorell; Hans Martin Hasselhorn
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005-07-02       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Evaluating the impact of a hypertension program for African Americans.

Authors:  Angelia M Paschal; Rhonda K Lewis; Arneatha Martin; Donna Dennis Shipp; Donna Sanders Simpson
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  Inter-method agreement between O*NET and survey measures of psychosocial exposure among healthcare industry employees.

Authors:  Manuel Cifuentes; Jon Boyer; Rebecca Gore; Angelo d'Errico; Jamie Tessler; Patrick Scollin; Debra Lerner; David Kriebel; Laura Punnett; Craig Slatin
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.214

4.  Working conditions and masked hypertension.

Authors:  Paul A Landsbergis; Arlene Travis; Peter L Schnall
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2013-05-24

5.  Stroke among male professional drivers in Denmark, 1994-2003.

Authors:  F Tüchsen; H Hannerz; C Roepstorff; N Krause
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  Job strain, effort-reward imbalance and ambulatory blood pressure: results of a cross-sectional study in call handler operators.

Authors:  Giovanni Maina; Massimo Bovenzi; Antonio Palmas; Andrea Prodi; Francesca Larese Filon
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 7.  Job strain and ambulatory blood pressure: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Paul A Landsbergis; Marnie Dobson; George Koutsouras; Peter Schnall
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Individual and work-unit measures of psychological demands and decision latitude and the use of antihypertensive medication.

Authors:  S Daugaard; J H Andersen; M B Grynderup; Z A Stokholm; R Rugulies; Å M Hansen; A Kærgaard; S Mikkelsen; J P Bonde; J F Thomsen; K L Christensen; H A Kolstad
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2014-07-06       Impact factor: 3.015

9.  'Adaptive' psychosocial factors in relation to home blood pressure: a study in the general population of southern Netherlands.

Authors:  Ivan Nyklícek; Ad Vingerhoets
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2009-05-08

10.  Stressful life events and current psychological distress are associated with self-reported hypertension but not with true hypertension: results from a cross-sectional population-based study.

Authors:  Felipe Sparrenberger; Sandra C Fuchs; Leila B Moreira; Flávio D Fuchs
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.