Literature DB >> 17556173

Will 3-dimensional PET-CT enable the routine quantification of myocardial blood flow?

Robert A deKemp1, Keiichiro Yoshinaga, Rob S B Beanlands.   

Abstract

Quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and flow reserve has been used extensively with positron emission tomography (PET) to investigate the functional significance of coronary artery disease. Increasingly, flow quantification is being applied to investigations of microvascular dysfunction in early atherosclerosis and in nonatherosclerotic microvascular disease associated with primary and secondary cardiomyopathies. Fully three-dimensional (3D) acquisition is becoming the standard imaging mode on new equipment, bringing with it certain challenges for cardiac PET, but also the potential for MBF to be measured simultaneously with routine electrocardiography (ECG)-gated perfusion imaging. Existing 3D versus 2D comparative studies support the use of 3D cardiac PET for flow quantification, and these protocols can be translated to PET-CT, which offers a virtually noise-free attenuation correction. This technology combines the strengths of cardiac CT for evaluation of anatomy with cardiac PET for quantification of the hemodynamic impact on the myocardium. High throughput clinical imaging protocols are needed to evaluate the incremental diagnostic and prognostic value of this technology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17556173     DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  128 in total

1.  Effect of metoprolol on absolute myocardial blood flow in patients with heart failure secondary to ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Susan K Bennett; Mark F Smith; Stephen S Gottlieb; Michael L Fisher; Stephen L Bacharach; Vasken Dilsizian
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Coronary hemodynamics and myocardial metabolism in patients with syndrome X: response to pacing stress.

Authors:  P G Camici; P Marraccini; R Lorenzoni; G Buzzigoli; N Pecori; A Perissinotto; E Ferrannini; A L'Abbate; M Marzilli
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  Application of cardiac molecular imaging using positron emission tomography in evaluation of drug and therapeutics for cardiovascular disorders.

Authors:  Keiichiro Yoshinaga; Benjamin J W Chow; Robert A dekemp; Stephanie Thorn; Terrence D Ruddy; Ross A Davies; Jean N DaSilva; Rob Beanlands
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.116

4.  Effects of nifedipine on myocardial blood flow and systolic function in humans with ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  G Zervos; R M Zusman; L A Swindle; N M Alpert; A J Fischman; H Gewirtz
Journal:  Coron Artery Dis       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.439

5.  Noninvasive assessment of coronary microcirculatory function in postmenopausal women and effects of short-term and long-term estrogen administration.

Authors:  Roxana Campisi; Lauren Nathan; Miguel Hernandez Pampaloni; Heiko Schöder; James W Sayre; Gautam Chaudhuri; Heinrich R Schelbert
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Coronary heart disease in smokers: vitamin C restores coronary microcirculatory function.

Authors:  P A Kaufmann; T Gnecchi-Ruscone; M di Terlizzi; K P Schäfers; T F Lüscher; P G Camici
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional cardiac 82Rb PET studies.

Authors:  J R Votaw; M White
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Reduction of coronary flow reserve in areas with and without ischemia on stress perfusion imaging in patients with coronary artery disease: a study using oxygen 15-labeled water PET.

Authors:  Keiichiro Yoshinaga; Chietsugu Katoh; Kazuyuki Noriyasu; Yasuyoshi Iwado; Hideto Furuyama; Yoshinori Ito; Yuji Kuge; Tetsuro Kohya; Akira Kitabatake; Nagara Tamaki
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Chronic inflammation and impaired coronary vasoreactivity in patients with coronary risk factors.

Authors:  Thomas H Schindler; Egbert U Nitzsche; Manfred Olschewski; Nobuhisa Magosaki; Michael Mix; John O Prior; Alvaro D Facta; Ulrich Solzbach; Hanjoerg Just; Heinrich R Schelbert
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-08-16       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  A simplified method for quantification of myocardial blood flow using nitrogen-13-ammonia and dynamic PET.

Authors:  Y Choi; S C Huang; R A Hawkins; W G Kuhle; M Dahlbom; C K Hoh; J Czernin; M E Phelps; H R Schelbert
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  36 in total

1.  Intra- and inter-operator repeatability of myocardial blood flow and myocardial flow reserve measurements using rubidium-82 pet and a highly automated analysis program.

Authors:  Ran Klein; Jennifer M Renaud; Maria C Ziadi; Stephanie L Thorn; Andy Adler; Rob S Beanlands; Robert A deKemp
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  The clinical utility of assessing myocardial blood flow using positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Maria Cecilia Ziadi; Rob S B Beanlands
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow and flow reserve: Technical aspects.

Authors:  Ran Klein; Rob S B Beanlands; Robert A deKemp
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Diagnosis and prognosis of coronary artery disease: PET is superior to SPECT: Pro.

Authors:  Rob S B Beanlands; George Youssef
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Quantitative Coronary Physiology for Clinical Management: the Imaging Standard.

Authors:  K Lance Gould; Nils P Johnson
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Cardiac positron emission tomography: myocardial perfusion and metabolism in clinical practice.

Authors:  Paul Knaapen; Mark Lubberink
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 5.460

7.  Characterizing the normal range of myocardial blood flow with ⁸²rubidium and ¹³N-ammonia PET imaging.

Authors:  Jennifer M Renaud; Jean N DaSilva; Rob S B Beanlands; Robert A DeKemp
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 8.  Assessment of coronary endothelial function using PET.

Authors:  Keiichiro Yoshinaga; Osamu Manabe; Nagara Tamaki
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 9.  Precision and accuracy of clinical quantification of myocardial blood flow by dynamic PET: A technical perspective.

Authors:  Jonathan B Moody; Benjamin C Lee; James R Corbett; Edward P Ficaro; Venkatesh L Murthy
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 10.  Proceedings of the Cardiac PET Summit, 12 May 2014, Baltimore, MD : 3: Quantitation of myocardial blood flow.

Authors:  Timothy M Bateman; K Lance Gould; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.