Literature DB >> 17555234

Quality in radiation oncology.

Todd Pawlicki1, Arno J Mundt.   

Abstract

A modern approach to quality was developed in the United States at Bell Telephone Laboratories during the first part of the 20th century. Over the years, those quality techniques have been adopted and extended by almost every industry. Medicine in general and radiation oncology in particular have been slow to adopt modern quality techniques. This work contains a brief description of the history of research on quality that led to the development of organization-wide quality programs such as Six Sigma. The aim is to discuss the current approach to quality in radiation oncology as well as where quality should be in the future. A strategy is suggested with the goal to provide a threshold improvement in quality over the next 10 years.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17555234     DOI: 10.1118/1.2727748

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  8 in total

1.  The white book of radiation oncology in Spain.

Authors:  Ismael Herruzo; Jesús Romero; Amalia Palacios; Ana Mañas; Pilar Samper; Eloísa Bayo; Ferran Guedea
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Retrospective study on performance of constancy check device in Linac beam monitoring using Statistical Process Control.

Authors:  Bipasha Pal; Angshuman Pal; Suresh Das; Soura Palit; Papai Sarkar; Subhayan Mondal; Suman Mallik; Jyotirup Goswami; Sayan Das; Arijit Sen; Monidipa Mondol
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2019-12-10

3.  Statistical analysis of IMRT dosimetry quality assurance measurements for local delivery guideline.

Authors:  Jin Beom Chung; Jae Sung Kim; Sung Whan Ha; Sung-Joon Ye
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 4.  Guidelines for overcoming hospital managerial challenges: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Maria Crema; Chiara Verbano
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 2.423

5.  Improving linear accelerator service response with a real- time electronic event reporting system.

Authors:  Jeremy D P Hoisak; Todd Pawlicki; Gwe-Ya Kim; Richard Fletcher; Kevin L Moore
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  An improvement in IMRT QA results and beam matching in linacs using statistical process control.

Authors:  Justin D Gagneur; Gary A Ezzell
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Common Error Pathways in CyberKnife™ Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Brandon T Mullins; Lukasz Mazur; Michael Dance; Ross McGurk; Eric Schreiber; Lawrence B Marks; Colette J Shen; Michael V Lawrence; Bhishamjit S Chera
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Operational consistency of medical linear accelerators manufactured and commissioned in series.

Authors:  Callistus M Nguyen; Alan H Baydush; James D Ververs; Scott Isom; Charles M Able; Michael T Munley
Journal:  Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-05-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.