Literature DB >> 17549493

FlexGuard: a new laser insertion sheath: functional aspects in ureterorenoscopy (URS).

T R W Herrmann1, T Bach, F Imkamp, H Tezval, C Klot, U Jonas, A J Gross, M Burchardt.   

Abstract

The evolution of flexible ureteroscopes led to a widespread use for the management of upper urinary tract abnormalities. The cost of purchase, maintenance and the durability of these instruments has become a major issue. This work describes a new device to avoid damages due to incorrect use of the Holmium laser during insertion of the laser fibre. A laser fibre with an optical core of 271 and 430 muicrom outside diameter was slid inside the FlexGuard laser fibre insertion sheath (LISA laser products, Germany). The outside diameter of the sheath measures 2.7 F (0.9 mm) and 2.1 F (0.7 mm) luminal diameter. The distal fibre tip was brought up to a position app. 2 mm inside the distal end of the sheath. The loaded sheath was pushed through the working channel of various ureteroscopes which were in maximum deflection. With the insertion sheath protruding about 2 mm from the distal tip of the URS the fibre was effortless forwarded out of the sheath to approach the stone. Once the laser fibre was in position, the sheath was removed, to increase the volume of irrigation fluid during laser lithotripsy. The radius of curvature (ROC) of the URS in maximum deflection and the integrity of the working channel was investigated. Using the insertion sheath the laser fibre reached the working position without any recognition of scratching or resistance. The integrity of the ureterorenoscopes was checked thoroughly be manually operated manometry. No damage of the inner surface of the working channel occurred. The ROC of the instrument did not change significantly during this procedure. After removal of the sheath the ROC remained stable. With the extended use of ureteroscopy, durability and repair costs are of concern. Damage resulting from incorrect use of laser fibres is a major issue in this respect. FlexGuard proved to avoid this damage in all flexible ureteroscopes investigated without limiting their mobility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17549493     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-007-0176-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   3.661


  28 in total

1.  Nitinol stone retrieval-assisted ureteroscopic management of lower pole renal calculi.

Authors:  J Kourambas; F C Delvecchio; R Munver; G M Preminger
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-12-20       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Cost analysis of flexible ureterorenoscopy.

Authors:  J W Collins; F X Keeley; A Timoney
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 3.  Ureteroscopic management of renal calculi in anomalous kidneys.

Authors:  Alon Z Weizer; W Patrick Springhart; Wesley O Ekeruo; Brian R Matlaga; Yeh H Tan; Dean G Assimos; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Frequency of ureteroscope damage seen at a tertiary care center.

Authors:  Robert I Carey; Christopher S Gomez; Giuseppe Maurici; Charles M Lynne; Raymond J Leveillee; Vincent G Bird
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Assessment of a new tipless nitinol stone basket and comparison with an existing flat-wire basket.

Authors:  R J Honey
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Cost-effective treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a decision tree analysis.

Authors:  Matthew T Gettman; Yair Lotan; Claus G Roerhborn; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Margaret S Pearle
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Does the cleaning technique influence the durability of the <9F flexible ureteroscope?

Authors:  E M McDougall; G Alberts; K J Deal; J M Nagy
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Does a ureteral access sheath facilitate ureteroscopy?

Authors:  J Kourambas; R R Byrne; G M Preminger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Endoscopic management of the symptomatic caliceal diverticular calculus.

Authors:  M Grasso; G Lang; P Loisides; D Bagley; F Taylor
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Ureteroscopic treatment of lower pole calculi: comparison of lithotripsy in situ and after displacement.

Authors:  Timothy G Schuster; Brent K Hollenbeck; Gary J Faerber; J Stuart Wolf
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  3 in total

1.  Superiority of the EF-120-00-3F biopsy forceps in the histopathological evaluation of upper urinary tract specimens.

Authors:  Mario W Kramer; Mahmoud Abbas; Mohammad Kabbani; Florian Imkamp; Udo Nagele; Thorsten Bach; Stephan Jutzi; Christoph von Klot; Jan Becker; Axel S Merseburger; Markus A Kuczyk; Hans H Kreipe; Thomas R Herrmann
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Handling and protecting your flexible ureteroscope: how to maximise scope usage.

Authors:  Khaled Hosny; Jennifer Clark; Shalom J Srirangam
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-09

3.  Lower pole calculi larger than one centimeter: Retrograde intrarenal surgery.

Authors:  Andreas J Gross; Thorsten Bach
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2008-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.