Literature DB >> 17549460

Tactile motion aftereffects produced by appropriate presentation for mechanoreceptors.

Junji Watanabe1, Seiichiro Hayashi, Hiroyuki Kajimoto, Susumu Tachi, Shin'ya Nishida.   

Abstract

Tactile motion perception is one of the most important functions for realizing a delicate appreciation of the tactile world. To explore the neural dynamics of motion processing in the brain, the motion adaptation phenomenon can be a useful probe. Tactile motion aftereffects (MAE), however, have not been reported in a reproducible fashion, and the indistinctive outcomes of the previous studies can be ascribed to the non-optimal choice of adapting and testing stimuli. Considering the features of the stimuli used in the studies, the stimuli activated the different mechanoreceptors in the adapting and testing phase. Consequently, we tested tactile MAE using appropriate combinations of adapting and testing stimuli. We used three pins to generate sensation of apparent motion on the finger cushion. They were sequentially vibrated with the frequency of 30 Hz both in adapting and testing phases. It is expected that this procedure ensured stimulation for the same mechanoreceptor (Rapid-Adapting mechanoreceptor) in both the adaptation and test phases. Using this procedure, we found robust tactile MAEs in the various tactile motions such as the short-distance motion within the fingertip, the long-distance motion from the finger base to the fingertip, and the circular motion on the fingertip. Our development of a protocol that reliably produces tactile MAEs will provide a useful psychophysical probe into the neural mechanisms of tactile motion processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17549460     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-0979-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   2.064


  18 in total

1.  The prevalence of tactile motion aftereffects.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Lerner; James C Craig
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.111

2.  The motion aftereffect.

Authors:  S Anstis; F A Verstraten; G Mather
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-03-01       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Influences of low and high frequency oscillation upon spatio-tactile resolution.

Authors:  C J Vierck; M B Jones
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1970-12

4.  Representation of moving tactile stimuli in the somatic sensory cortex of awake monkeys.

Authors:  S Ruiz; P Crespo; R Romo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Tactile apparent movement: the effects of shape and type of motion.

Authors:  J H Kirman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-07

6.  Neuronal mechanisms underlying direction sensitivity of somatosensory cortical neurons in awake monkeys.

Authors:  E P Gardner; R M Costanzo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  A quantitative analysis of responses of direction-sensitive neurons in somatosensory cortex of awake monkeys.

Authors:  R M Costanzo; E P Gardner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Simulation of motion on the skin. I. Receptive fields and temporal frequency coding by cutaneous mechanoreceptors of OPTACON pulses delivered to the hand.

Authors:  E P Gardner; C I Palmer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Organization of primary somatosensory cortex in the cat.

Authors:  R W Dykes; D D Rasmusson; P B Hoeltzell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Factors influencing cutaneous directional sensitivity: a correlative psychophysical and neurophysiological investigation.

Authors:  G K Essick; B L Whitsel
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  12 in total

1.  Site of stimulation effects on the prevalence of the tactile motion aftereffect.

Authors:  Peggy J Planetta; Philip Servos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The postcentral gyrus shows sustained fMRI activation during the tactile motion aftereffect.

Authors:  Peggy J Planetta; Philip Servos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Directional remapping in tactile inter-finger apparent motion: a motion aftereffect study.

Authors:  Scinob Kuroki; Junji Watanabe; Kunihiko Mabuchi; Susumu Tachi; Shin'ya Nishida
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Motion aftereffects transfer between touch and vision.

Authors:  Talia Konkle; Qi Wang; Vincent Hayward; Christopher I Moore
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  The tactile motion aftereffect suggests an intensive code for speed in neurons sensitive to both speed and direction of motion.

Authors:  S McIntyre; I Birznieks; R M Vickery; A O Holcombe; T Seizova-Cajic
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  What can crossmodal aftereffects reveal about neural representation and dynamics?

Authors:  Talia Konkle; Christopher I Moore
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2009-11

7.  Tactile motion adaptation reduces perceived speed but shows no evidence of direction sensitivity.

Authors:  Sarah McIntyre; Alex O Holcombe; Ingvars Birznieks; Tatjana Seizova-Cajic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Perceived duration of Visual and Tactile Stimuli Depends on Perceived Speed.

Authors:  Alice Tomassini; Monica Gori; David Burr; Giulio Sandini; Maria Concetta Morrone
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-12

9.  Cross-Sensory Facilitation Reveals Neural Interactions between Visual and Tactile Motion in Humans.

Authors:  Monica Gori; Giacomo Mazzilli; Giulio Sandini; David Burr
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-04-13

10.  Haptic adaptation to slant: No transfer between exploration modes.

Authors:  Loes C J van Dam; Myrthe A Plaisier; Catharina Glowania; Marc O Ernst
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.