Literature DB >> 20047091

Site of stimulation effects on the prevalence of the tactile motion aftereffect.

Peggy J Planetta1, Philip Servos.   

Abstract

The motion aftereffect (MAE) refers to the apparent motion of a stationary stimulus following adaptation to a continuously moving stimulus. There is a growing consensus that the fast adapting (FA) rather than the slowly adapting (SA) afferent units mediate the tactile version of the MAE. The present study investigated which FA units underlie the tactile MAE by measuring its prevalence, duration, and vividness on different skin areas that vary in their composition of FA units. Specifically, the right cheek, volar surface of the forearm, and volar surface of the hand were adapted using a ridged cylindrical drum, which rotated at 60 rpm for 120 s. Although there was no difference in duration or vividness between the skin surfaces tested, the tactile MAE was reported twice as often on the hand compared to the cheek and forearm, which did not differ significantly from one another. This suggests that the FA I units in the glabrous skin and the hair follicle and/or the FA I and field units in the hairy skin contribute to the tactile MAE.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20047091     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-2144-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  23 in total

Review 1.  The roles and functions of cutaneous mechanoreceptors.

Authors:  K O Johnson
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  The relationship of the number of Meissner's corpuscles to dermatoglyphic characters and finger size.

Authors:  Y K Dillon; J Haynes; M Henneberg
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Microelectrode recordings from human oral mechanoreceptors.

Authors:  R S Johansson; K A Olsson
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1976-12-17       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Vibrotactile adaptation on the face.

Authors:  M Hollins; K A Delemos; A K Goble
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-01

5.  Receptive field sensitivity profile of mechanosensitive units innervating the glabrous skin of the human hand.

Authors:  R S Johansson
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1976-03-12       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Illusory motion reversals from unambiguous motion with visual, proprioceptive, and tactile stimuli.

Authors:  Alex O Holcombe; Tatjana Seizova-Cajic
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  The tactile motion aftereffect revisited.

Authors:  Peggy J Planetta; Philip Servos
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.111

8.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

9.  Mechanoreceptor activity from the human face and oral mucosa.

Authors:  R S Johansson; M Trulsson; K A Olsson; K G Westberg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Properties of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the human hand related to touch sensation.

Authors:  A B Vallbo; R S Johansson
Journal:  Hum Neurobiol       Date:  1984
View more
  3 in total

1.  The postcentral gyrus shows sustained fMRI activation during the tactile motion aftereffect.

Authors:  Peggy J Planetta; Philip Servos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Directional remapping in tactile inter-finger apparent motion: a motion aftereffect study.

Authors:  Scinob Kuroki; Junji Watanabe; Kunihiko Mabuchi; Susumu Tachi; Shin'ya Nishida
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Tactile motion adaptation reduces perceived speed but shows no evidence of direction sensitivity.

Authors:  Sarah McIntyre; Alex O Holcombe; Ingvars Birznieks; Tatjana Seizova-Cajic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.