Literature DB >> 3938308

Factors influencing cutaneous directional sensitivity: a correlative psychophysical and neurophysiological investigation.

G K Essick, B L Whitsel.   

Abstract

The effects of 4 parameters of moving tactile stimuli (i.e., velocity, traverse length, position and orientation) on human cutaneous directional sensitivity and on the behavior of directionally sensitive neurons in S-I of unanesthetized macaque monkeys are studied. The experimental paradigms and approaches to data analysis are based on sensory decision theory (SDT), and provide indices of single neuron and of perceptual cutaneous direction sensitivity that can be compared. Human cutaneous directional sensitivity is shown to be maximal when the stimuli move at velocities between 5 and 30 cm/s, and to fall off either at lower or higher velocities. The neurophysiological studies of the effects of velocity reveal a heterogeneity in the population of directionally sensitive S-I neurons. Some neurons are shown to exhibit maximal directional sensitivity at velocities between 5 and 30 cm/s, whereas others possess maximal directional sensitivity at lower velocities (i.e., less than 5 cm/s). Human cutaneous directional sensitivity is determined at each of 5 different forelimb regions. The data reveal that a pronounced gradient in human cutaneous directional sensitivity exists along the proximodistal axis of the forelimb, with the greatest sensitivity existing at the most distal forelimb site studied. The companion neurophysiological studies reveal that a change in the position of the moving stimulus within the receptive field of an individual directionally sensitive S-I neuron is usually accompanied by a change in the magnitude of its directional sensitivity. Two major classes of directionally sensitive S-I neurons can be distinguished on the basis of the in-field variations in directional sensitivity they exhibit. For one neuron class, preferred direction remains the same at all regions within the receptive field; these are termed 'direction invariant neurons' and they appear to be capable of signalling direction of motion unambiguously under most of the experimental conditions used in this study. For the neurons of the second class, preferred direction varies with the position of the stimulus within the receptive field; these are termed 'direction variant' neurons. Direction variant S-I neurons signal movement toward or away from a given point within the receptive field. As a consequence, a reversal in cutaneous directional sensitivity within their receptive fields can typically be demonstrated. For every direction variant neuron studied the receptive field position at which cutaneous directional sensitivity reversed was located over a joint.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3938308     DOI: 10.1016/0165-0173(85)90025-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  11 in total

1.  Somatotopic dominance in tactile temporal processing.

Authors:  Shinobu Kuroki; Junji Watanabe; Naoki Kawakami; Susumu Tachi; Shin'ya Nishida
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Velocity invariance of receptive field structure in somatosensory cortical area 3b of the alert monkey.

Authors:  J J DiCarlo; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  A critical speed for gating of tactile detection during voluntary movement.

Authors:  Anita Cybulska-Klosowicz; El-Mehdi Meftah; Mélissa Raby; Marie-Line Lemieux; C Elaine Chapman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Physiological substrates of normal deglutition.

Authors:  J G Kennedy; R D Kent
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.438

5.  Visual responses of neurons in somatosensory cortex of hamsters with experimentally induced retinal projections to somatosensory thalamus.

Authors:  C Métin; D O Frost
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The cellular and molecular basis of direction selectivity of Aδ-LTMRs.

Authors:  Michael Rutlin; Cheng-Ying Ho; Victoria E Abraira; Colleen Cassidy; Ling Bai; C Jeffery Woodbury; David D Ginty
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  The tactile motion aftereffect suggests an intensive code for speed in neurons sensitive to both speed and direction of motion.

Authors:  S McIntyre; I Birznieks; R M Vickery; A O Holcombe; T Seizova-Cajic
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Tactile motion aftereffects produced by appropriate presentation for mechanoreceptors.

Authors:  Junji Watanabe; Seiichiro Hayashi; Hiroyuki Kajimoto; Susumu Tachi; Shin'ya Nishida
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 2.064

9.  Methods for fine scale functional imaging of tactile motion in human and nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Robert M Friedman; Barbara C Dillenburger; Feng Wang; Malcum J Avison; John C Gore; Anna W Roe; Li Min Chen
Journal:  Open Neuroimag J       Date:  2011-11-18

10.  Cross-modal sensory integration of visual-tactile motion information: instrument design and human psychophysics.

Authors:  Yu-Cheng Pei; Ting-Yu Chang; Tsung-Chi Lee; Sudipta Saha; Hsin-Yi Lai; Manuel Gomez-Ramirez; Shih-Wei Chou; Alice M K Wong
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.