Literature DB >> 17546462

The impact of stimulus-specific practice and task instructions on response congruency effects between tasks.

Mike Wendt1, Andrea Kiesel.   

Abstract

In task switching experiments participants have to respond to the same set of stimuli while task instructions vary (e.g., digit stimuli are assigned to left- or right-sided key presses by means of magnitude vs. parity classification). Response congruency effects denote worse performance for a stimulus, which is associated with different responses in the two tasks as compared to a stimulus, which is associated with the same response. Previous research suggests that such effects reflect direct links between stimuli and responses acquired in the course of experimental practice. In the current study we investigated the impact of stimulus-specific practice and task instruction by reversing the S-R mapping of one task (Experiment 1) or replacing one task with a new one (Experiment 2) in the second half of an experimental session. Consistent with the direct link account, S-R links practiced during the first half of the experiment largely determined congruency effects despite altered task instructions. Furthermore, the results suggest that previously practiced S-R links (a) can be relatively quickly overwritten by practicing a novel S-R mapping, and (b) are subject to passive decay when no longer in use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17546462     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-007-0117-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  10 in total

1.  Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching.

Authors:  J S Rubinstein; D E Meyer; J E Evans
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Modeling cognitive control in task-switching.

Authors:  N Meiran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2000

3.  Task-switching and long-term priming: role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs.

Authors:  Florian Waszak; Bernhard Hommel; Alan Allport
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Response selection difficulty and asymmetrical costs of switching between tasks and stimuli: no evidence for an exogenous component of task-set reconfiguration.

Authors:  Mike Hübner; Rainer H Kluwe; Aquiles Luna-Rodriguez; Alexandra Peters
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  On the limits of advance preparation for a task switch: do people prepare all the task some of the time or some of the task all the time?

Authors:  Mei-Ching Lien; Eric Ruthruff; Roger W Remington; James C Johnston
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Task switching: on the origin of response congruency effects.

Authors:  Andrea Kiesel; Mike Wendt; Alexandra Peters
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-08-25

7.  Instruction-induced feature binding.

Authors:  Dorit Wenke; Robert Gaschler; Dieter Nattkemper
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-12-10

8.  Cue-based preparation and stimulus-based priming of tasks in task switching.

Authors:  Iring Koch; Alan Allport
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

9.  The effect of spatial frequency on global precedence and hemispheric differences.

Authors:  R Hübner
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1997-02

10.  The role of spatial frequency in the processing of hierarchically organized stimuli.

Authors:  M R Lamb; E W Yund
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-12
  10 in total
  16 in total

1.  The impact of task rules on distracter processing: automatic categorization of irrelevant stimuli.

Authors:  Renate Reisenauer; Gesine Dreisbach
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-01-18

2.  Proactive control of irrelevant task rules during cued task switching.

Authors:  Julie M Bugg; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-07-28

3.  Learning a nonmediated route for response selection in task switching.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-08

4.  Switching attention between modalities: further evidence for visual dominance.

Authors:  Sarah Lukas; Andrea M Philipp; Iring Koch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-06-11

5.  The effects of alerting signals in action control: activation of S-R associations or inhibition of executive control processes?

Authors:  Rico Fischer; Franziska Plessow; Andrea Kiesel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-06-11

6.  Task switching: effects of practice on switch and mixing costs.

Authors:  Tilo Strobach; Roman Liepelt; Torsten Schubert; Andrea Kiesel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-03-01

7.  Top-down versus bottom-up: when instructions overcome automatic retrieval.

Authors:  Florian Waszak; Roland Pfister; Andrea Kiesel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-10-14

8.  Competitor rule priming: evidence for priming of task rules in task switching.

Authors:  Maayan Katzir; Bnaya Ori; Shulan Hsieh; Nachshon Meiran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-06-20

9.  Mood state and conflict adaptation: an update and a diffusion model analysis.

Authors:  Stefanie Schuch; Sebastian Pütz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-10-28

10.  Selecting a response in task switching: testing a model of compound cue retrieval.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.