Literature DB >> 17544247

Discrepant perceptions about end-of-life communication: a systematic review.

Karen Hancock1, Josephine M Clayton, Sharon M Parker, Sharon Walder, Phyllis N Butow, Sue Carrick, David Currow, Davina Ghersi, Paul Glare, Rebecca Hagerty, Martin H N Tattersall.   

Abstract

Little research has compared the perceptions of health professionals (HPs), patients, and caregivers about the communication of prognostic information. The objectives of this literature review were to determine 1) patient and caregiver perceptions of levels of information received about prognosis and end-of-life (EoL) issues regarding a life-limiting illness; 2) patient perceptions of and factors related to their understanding and awareness of prognosis; 3) HPs' perceptions of patients' wishes about disclosure of prognosis and factors related to their decision whether to disclose; and 4) concordance between HPs and patients/caregivers regarding the information given by HPs about prognostic and EoL issues. Relevant studies meeting the inclusion criteria were identified by searching computerized databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials [Central]) up to November 2004. The reference lists of identified studies were hand searched for further relevant studies. Inclusion criteria were studies of any design evaluating communication of prognostic information that included adult patients with an advanced, life-limiting illness; their caregivers; and qualified HPs. Fifty-one studies were identified. There was a large discrepancy between patients/caregivers and HPs regarding the amount of information they believed had been given. Patients' understanding and awareness of information received conflicted with the HPs' perceptions of patients' understanding and awareness of the information that had been given. HPs tended to underestimate patients' need for information and overestimate patients' understanding and awareness of their prognosis and EoL issues. HPs need to repeatedly check patients' understanding and preferences for information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17544247     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  29 in total

Review 1.  Conceptualizing prognostic awareness in advanced cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Allison J Applebaum; Elissa A Kolva; Julia R Kulikowski; Jordana D Jacobs; Antonio DeRosa; Wendy G Lichtenthal; Megan E Olden; Barry Rosenfeld; William Breitbart
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2013-10-24

Review 2.  End-of-life care conversations with heart failure patients: a systematic literature review and narrative synthesis.

Authors:  Stephen Barclay; Natalie Momen; Steve Case-Upton; Isla Kuhn; Elizabeth Smith
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Information provision and patient reported outcomes in patients with metastasized colorectal cancer: results from the PROFILES registry.

Authors:  Olga Husson; Melissa S Y Thong; Floortje Mols; Tineke J Smilde; Geert-Jan Creemers; Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 4.  WITHDRAWN: Music therapy for end-of-life care.

Authors:  Joke Bradt; Cheryl Dileo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-03-17

5.  Outcomes of Prognostic Disclosure: Associations With Prognostic Understanding, Distress, and Relationship With Physician Among Patients With Advanced Cancer.

Authors:  Andrea C Enzinger; Baohui Zhang; Deborah Schrag; Holly G Prigerson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Advance care planning for cancer patients in primary care: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Kirsty Boyd; Bruce Mason; Marilyn Kendall; Stephen Barclay; David Chinn; Keri Thomas; Aziz Sheikh; Scott A Murray
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Assessment of palliative care cancer patients' most important concerns.

Authors:  Walter F Baile; J Lynn Palmer; Eduardo Bruera; Patricia A Parker
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-04-17       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Faculty development to change the paradigm of communication skills teaching in oncology.

Authors:  Anthony L Back; Robert M Arnold; Walter F Baile; James A Tulsky; Gwyn E Barley; Roy D Pea; Kelly A Fryer-Edwards
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Perceptions of medical interactions between healthcare providers and American Indian older adults.

Authors:  Eva Marie Garroutte; Natalia Sarkisian; Jack Goldberg; Dedra Buchwald; Janette Beals
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Ways of talking about illness and prognosis in palliative cancer care consultations--two interactional frames.

Authors:  Eva Lidén; Joakim Ohlén; Lars-Christer Hydén; Febe Friberg
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.