AIMS: Patients in the palliative care setting have a number of concerns not necessarily connected to their medical problems, such as spiritual and relationship issues. When these problems are not properly assessed and addressed, they may become a significant source of distress for patients and families. The aims of the present study were to assess the concerns of patients attending a palliative care clinic, to examine physicians' ratings of patient concerns, to access the concordance between patients' and physicians' ratings, and to assess the association between patients' concerns and their level of distress. METHODS: We evaluated 137 patients attending a symptom control and palliative care clinic. Patients completed the Concerns Checklist, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Cancer Behavior Inventory at the beginning of their visit. The Concerns Checklist was completed by the patient's clinic physician immediately after the visit and was used to estimate how accurate the physician was in identifying patients' concerns. We examined the correlation between the total number of patient concerns and their levels of anxiety, mood disturbance, and self-efficacy. RESULTS: Patients were most concerned about loss of function, the future, and caring for themselves. Concordance between physician and patient rating of concerns was poor (all kappas, 0.26 or lower). Higher levels of patient concerns were associated with greater anxiety (r = 0.52) and depressive symptoms (r = 0.40) and lower self-efficacy (r = -0.37). CONCLUSIONS: There was generally poor concordance between patients reporting of their concerns and physicians reporting of the patients' concerns. In addition, patients' with more concerns also had higher levels of anxiety and depressive symptoms. Thus, it is important to find strategies to more accurately identify patients' concerns, so that they can be adequately addressed.
AIMS: Patients in the palliative care setting have a number of concerns not necessarily connected to their medical problems, such as spiritual and relationship issues. When these problems are not properly assessed and addressed, they may become a significant source of distress for patients and families. The aims of the present study were to assess the concerns of patients attending a palliative care clinic, to examine physicians' ratings of patient concerns, to access the concordance between patients' and physicians' ratings, and to assess the association between patients' concerns and their level of distress. METHODS: We evaluated 137 patients attending a symptom control and palliative care clinic. Patients completed the Concerns Checklist, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Cancer Behavior Inventory at the beginning of their visit. The Concerns Checklist was completed by the patient's clinic physician immediately after the visit and was used to estimate how accurate the physician was in identifying patients' concerns. We examined the correlation between the total number of patient concerns and their levels of anxiety, mood disturbance, and self-efficacy. RESULTS:Patients were most concerned about loss of function, the future, and caring for themselves. Concordance between physician and patient rating of concerns was poor (all kappas, 0.26 or lower). Higher levels of patient concerns were associated with greater anxiety (r = 0.52) and depressive symptoms (r = 0.40) and lower self-efficacy (r = -0.37). CONCLUSIONS: There was generally poor concordance between patients reporting of their concerns and physicians reporting of the patients' concerns. In addition, patients' with more concerns also had higher levels of anxiety and depressive symptoms. Thus, it is important to find strategies to more accurately identify patients' concerns, so that they can be adequately addressed.
Authors: J Zabora; K BrintzenhofeSzoc; P Jacobsen; B Curbow; S Piantadosi; C Hooker; A Owens; L Derogatis Journal: Psychosomatics Date: 2001 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.386
Authors: Galina Velikova; Laura Booth; Adam B Smith; Paul M Brown; Pamela Lynch; Julia M Brown; Peter J Selby Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-02-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: E P Wright; P J Selby; M Crawford; A Gillibrand; C Johnston; T J Perren; R Rush; A Smith; G Velikova; K Watson; A Gould; A Cull Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-01-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Kavita D Chandwani; Fengmin Zhao; Gary R Morrow; Teresa L Deshields; Lori M Minasian; Judith Manola; Michael J Fisch Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2017-02-06 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Arif H Kamal; Janet Bull; Dio Kavalieratos; Donald H Taylor; William Downey; Amy P Abernethy Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Stewart C Alexander; Susan Ladwig; Sally A Norton; David Gramling; J Kelly Davis; Maureen Metzger; Jane DeLuca; Robert Gramling Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2014-03-03 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Sophie I van Dongen; Kim de Nooijer; Jane M Cramm; Anneke L Francke; Wendy H Oldenmenger; Ida J Korfage; Frederika E Witkamp; Rik Stoevelaar; Agnes van der Heide; Judith Ac Rietjens Journal: Palliat Med Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 4.762
Authors: Katja Krug; René Alexander Ballhausen; Regine Bölter; Peter Engeser; Michel Wensing; Joachim Szecsenyi; Frank Peters-Klimm Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2018-07-13 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Jennifer Philip; Roslyn Le Gautier; Anna Collins; Anna K Nowak; Brian Le; Gregory B Crawford; Nicole Rankin; Meinir Krishnasamy; Geoff Mitchell; Sue-Anne McLachlan; Maarten IJzerman; Robyn Hudson; Danny Rischin; Tanara Vieira Sousa; Vijaya Sundararajan Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2021-05-27 Impact factor: 2.655