Literature DB >> 1754368

Perceptual organization and focused attention: the role of objects and proximity in visual processing.

A F Kramer1, A Jacobson.   

Abstract

The influence of the Gestalt grouping principles of similarity, closure, and proximity on the size of the response-compatibility effect was examined in a focused attention task. In three studies, subjects responded to a centrally located target and attempted to ignore adjacent distractors. The distractors, which served as targets on other trials, could be compatible, incompatible, or neutral with respect to the response of the target. In addition, the distractors and the target could be embedded in the same object, presented in the same color, presented on different objects, or presented in different colors. The typical response-compatibility effect (B. A. Eriksen & C. W. Eriksen, 1974) was found when the target and distractors were embedded in the same object or presented in the same color. Performance was poorer when the target was surrounded by response-incompatible distractors than when it was surrounded by response-compatible distractors. However, the response-compatibility effect was eliminated when the target and distractors were embedded in different objects, even when the distance between the items was less than .25 degrees of visual angle. Furthermore, the response-compatibility effect was of intermediate size when the distractors were not grouped strongly with the target or with neutral flankers. The results are discussed in terms of space- and object-based models of visual attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1754368     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206750

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  50 in total

1.  Visual sensory units and the minimal angle of resolution.

Authors:  F W WEYMOUTH
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1958-07       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Selective attention and the organization of visual information.

Authors:  J Duncan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1984-12

3.  Selection of moving and static objects for the control of spatially directed action.

Authors:  S P Tipper; J C Brehaut; J Driver
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Variations in size of the visual field in which targets are presented: an attentional range effect.

Authors:  D LaBerge; V Brown
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-09

5.  The spatial allocation of visual attention as indexed by event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  G R Mangun; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.888

6.  Attending to color and shape: the special role of location in selective visual processing.

Authors:  Y Tsal; N Lavie
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-07

7.  Moving attention through visual space.

Authors:  G L Shulman; R W Remington; J P McLean
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Moving attention: evidence for time-invariant shifts of visual selective attention.

Authors:  R Remington; L Pierce
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-04

9.  Interaction between global and local levels of a form.

Authors:  J E Hoffman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06
View more
  56 in total

1.  Selective attention to the parts of an object.

Authors:  S P Vecera; M Behrmann; J McGoldrick
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-06

2.  Cued visual attention does not distinguish between occluded and occluding objects.

Authors:  C Haimson; M Behrmann
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-09

3.  A neurodynamical model of visual attention: feedback enhancement of spatial resolution in a hierarchical system.

Authors:  G Deco; J Zihl
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.621

4.  Overt and covert object-based attention.

Authors:  Jason S McCarley; Arthur F Kramer; Matthew S Peterson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

5.  Top-down control over involuntary attention switching in the auditory modality.

Authors:  E Sussman; I Winkler; E Schröger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

6.  The modulation of inhibition of return by object-internal structure: implications for theories of object-based attentional selection.

Authors:  Irene Reppa; E Charles Leek
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-06

7.  Attending to space within and between objects: Implications from a patient with Balint's syndrome.

Authors:  Lynn C Robertson; Anne Treisman
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Space-, object-, and feature-based attention interact to organize visual scenes.

Authors:  Dwight J Kravitz; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Automatic, stimulus-driven attentional capture by objecthood.

Authors:  Ruth Kimchi; Yaffa Yeshurun; Aliza Cohen-Savransky
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-02

10.  Distractor interference stays constant despite variation in working memory load.

Authors:  Zhe Chen; Celestien C Chan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.