OBJECT: Deep infections of the spine are a significant cause of morbidity and death. Such infections complicate 0.7 to 11.9% of spinal procedures. Management includes intravenous antibiotic therapy, debridement and irrigation with primary closure, placement of drains, use of irrigation systems, and/or healing through secondary intention with wound packing. Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) is a new alternative for treatment of patients with complex postoperative spinal infections. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety of this treatment method in this patient population. METHODS: The authors reviewed the charts of 16 consecutive patients treated with negative-pressure wound therapy at their institution between 2002 and 2006. All had deep infections of the spine and were treated with surgical debridement and placement of VAC dressings. All infections were postoperative. Members of the infectious disease service were involved in the care of all patients, and all patients received intravenous antibiotic therapy. The authors reviewed operative notes, discharge summaries, and notes from follow-up visits and assessed outcome on the basis of the same records. Three patients were lost to follow up, leaving a group of 13 with follow up of at least 90 days. Two patients experienced bleeding complications related to the continuous negative pressure of the VAC device. In two cases, the infections persisted and required reoperation. In one case, a skin graft was required because of nonhealing granulation tissue. One of the patients with bleeding complications died as a result of delayed complications related to intraoperative blood loss, blood loss via the VAC system, and refusal of a blood transfusion on religious grounds. CONCLUSIONS: Negative-pressure wound therapy has been employed as a treatment strategy for patients with complex postoperative spinal infections, but little is known of the complications associated with VAC in the spinal surgery patient population. Serious complications, including death, may be associated with use of the VAC system.
OBJECT: Deep infections of the spine are a significant cause of morbidity and death. Such infections complicate 0.7 to 11.9% of spinal procedures. Management includes intravenous antibiotic therapy, debridement and irrigation with primary closure, placement of drains, use of irrigation systems, and/or healing through secondary intention with wound packing. Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) is a new alternative for treatment of patients with complex postoperative spinal infections. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety of this treatment method in this patient population. METHODS: The authors reviewed the charts of 16 consecutive patients treated with negative-pressure wound therapy at their institution between 2002 and 2006. All had deep infections of the spine and were treated with surgical debridement and placement of VAC dressings. All infections were postoperative. Members of the infectious disease service were involved in the care of all patients, and all patients received intravenous antibiotic therapy. The authors reviewed operative notes, discharge summaries, and notes from follow-up visits and assessed outcome on the basis of the same records. Three patients were lost to follow up, leaving a group of 13 with follow up of at least 90 days. Two patients experienced bleeding complications related to the continuous negative pressure of the VAC device. In two cases, the infections persisted and required reoperation. In one case, a skin graft was required because of nonhealing granulation tissue. One of the patients with bleeding complications died as a result of delayed complications related to intraoperative blood loss, blood loss via the VAC system, and refusal of a blood transfusion on religious grounds. CONCLUSIONS: Negative-pressure wound therapy has been employed as a treatment strategy for patients with complex postoperative spinal infections, but little is known of the complications associated with VAC in the spinal surgery patient population. Serious complications, including death, may be associated with use of the VAC system.
Authors: Allen Gabriel; Jaimie Shores; Brent Bernstein; Jean de Leon; Ravi Kamepalli; Tom Wolvos; Mona M Baharestani; Subhas Gupta Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 3.315
Authors: Ryan M Naylor; Hannah E Gilder; Nikita Gupta; Thomas C Hydrick; Joshua R Labott; David J Mauler; Taylor P Trentadue; Brandon Ghislain; Benjamin D Elder; Jeremy L Fogelson Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2020-01-28 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: Luca A Dessy; Francesco Serratore; Federico Corrias; Paola Parisi; Marco Mazzocchi; Bruno Carlesimo Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2013-04-17 Impact factor: 3.315
Authors: Ravish Shammi Patel; Samuel Sherng Young Wang; Miguel Rafael David Ramos; Husam Walid Naji Najjar; Samuel Vara Prasad; Naresh Kumar Journal: Int J Spine Surg Date: 2019-12-31
Authors: Josh E Schroeder; Fredrico P Girardi; Harvinder Sandhu; Joseph Weinstein; Frank P Cammisa; Andrew Sama Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2015-08-07 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Robert Lee; Daniel Beder; John Street; Michael Boyd; Charles Fisher; Marcel Dvorak; Scott Paquette; Brian Kwon Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2018-04-25 Impact factor: 3.134