Literature DB >> 35931831

Safety and efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy in treating deep surgical site infection after lumbar surgery.

Jingming Wang1, Yang Yang1, Wenqiang Xing1, Hao Xing1, Yun Bai1, Zhengqi Chang2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for post-operative deep surgical site infection (SSI) after posterior instrumented spinal surgery.
METHODS: We retrospectively compared the clinical outcomes of NPWT with standard debridement for deep SSI after posterior instrumented spinal surgery from 2012 to 2020 in our department. The primary outcomes were peri-operative characteristics including positive organism results, duration of fever, and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores three days after re-operation. The secondary outcomes were post-operative characteristics including implant infection recurrence, implant retention rate, duration of hospitalization, and VAS at discharge. Pearson's chi-squared analysis (categorical) and Student's t test (continuous) were used to determine the differences.
RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were included, of which 19 underwent NPWT, and 15 underwent standard debridement. Patients in the NPWT group all significantly improved primary outcomes including duration of fever after re-operation (0.95 ± 1.13 vs 4.07 ± 5.35, P = 0.001), positive organism results (14 of 19 vs 2 of 15, P < 0.01), and VAS at 3 days after re-operation (2.58 ± 0.69 vs 3.40 ± 1.06, P < 0.05). Patients in NPWT group exhibited significant decrease in implant infection recurrence (0 of 19 vs 5 of 15, P < 0.01), implant retention rate (19 of 19 vs 10 of 15, P < 0.01), duration of hospitalization (27.74 ± 10.95 vs 37.67 ± 13.67, P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: NPWT is a feasible and safe treatment option for deep SSI after posterior instrumented spinal surgery.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to SICOT aisbl.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical outcome; Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT); Spinal instrumentation; Surgical site infection (SSI)

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35931831     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-022-05531-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.479


  25 in total

1.  Surgical site infection: incidence and impact on hospital utilization and treatment costs.

Authors:  Gregory de Lissovoy; Kathy Fraeman; Valerie Hutchins; Denise Murphy; David Song; Brian B Vaughn
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 2.918

2.  National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) report: data summary for 2006 through 2008, issued December 2009.

Authors:  Jonathan R Edwards; Kelly D Peterson; Yi Mu; Shailendra Banerjee; Katherine Allen-Bridson; Gloria Morrell; Margaret A Dudeck; Daniel A Pollock; Teresa C Horan
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.918

3.  Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute care hospitals.

Authors:  Deverick J Anderson; Keith S Kaye; David Classen; Kathleen M Arias; Kelly Podgorny; Helen Burstin; David P Calfee; Susan E Coffin; Erik R Dubberke; Victoria Fraser; Dale N Gerding; Frances A Griffin; Peter Gross; Michael Klompas; Evelyn Lo; Jonas Marschall; Leonard A Mermel; Lindsay Nicolle; David A Pegues; Trish M Perl; Sanjay Saint; Cassandra D Salgado; Robert A Weinstein; Robert Wise; Deborah S Yokoe
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 4.  Surgical Site Infections: An Update.

Authors:  Bronwen H Garner; Deverick J Anderson
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.982

5.  Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infection After Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Based on Twenty-Seven Studies.

Authors:  Xiao-Qiang Peng; Chun-Guang Sun; Zheng-Guo Fei; Qi-Jia Zhou
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 2.104

6.  Risk factors for surgical site infection following spinal instrumentation surgery.

Authors:  Hirokazu Shoji; Toru Hirano; Kei Watanabe; Masayuki Ohashi; Tatsuki Mizouchi; Naoto Endo
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 1.601

7.  What are the risk factors for surgical site infection after spinal fusion? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sebastien Pesenti; Tejbir Pannu; Jessica Andres-Bergos; Renaud Lafage; Justin S Smith; Steve Glassman; Marinus de Kleuver; Ferran Pellise; Frank Schwab; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infection After Spinal Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Qi Fei; Jinjun Li; JiSheng Lin; Dong Li; BingQiang Wang; Hai Meng; Qi Wang; Nan Su; Yong Yang
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 2.104

9.  Therapy of spinal wound infections using vacuum-assisted wound closure: risk factors leading to resistance to treatment.

Authors:  Avraam Ploumis; Amir A Mehbod; Thomas D Dressel; Daryll C Dykes; Ensor E Transfeldt; John E Lonstein
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2008-07

10.  Negative-pressure wound therapy in the treatment of complex postoperative spinal wound infections: complications and lessons learned using vacuum-assisted closure.

Authors:  G Alexander Jones; John Butler; Isador Lieberman; Richard Schlenk
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2007-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.