Literature DB >> 17541550

The importance of religious affiliation and culture on end-of-life decisions in European intensive care units.

Charles L Sprung1, Paulo Maia, Hans-Henrik Bulow, Bara Ricou, Apostolos Armaganidis, Mario Baras, Elisabet Wennberg, Konrad Reinhart, Simon L Cohen, Dietmar R Fries, George Nakos, Lambertius G Thijs.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of religious affiliation and culture on end-of-life decisions in European intensive care units (ICUs). DESIGN AND
SETTING: A prospective, observational study of European ICUs was performed on consecutive patients with any limitation of therapy. Prospectively defined end-of-life practices in 37 ICUs in 17 European countries studied from 1 January 1999 to 30 June 2000 were compared for frequencies, patterns, timing, and communication by religious affiliation of physicians and patients and regions.
RESULTS: Of the 31,417 patients 3,086 had limitations. Withholding occurred more often than withdrawing if the physician was Jewish (81%), Greek Orthodox (78%), or Moslem (63%). Withdrawing occurred more often for physicians who were Catholic (53%), Protestant (49%), or had no religious affiliation (47%). End-of-life decisions differed for physicians between regions and who had any religious affiliation vs. no religious affiliation in all three geographical regions. Median time from ICU admission to first limitation of therapy was 3.2 days but varied by religious affiliation; from 1.6 days for Protestant to 7.6 days for Greek Orthodox physicians. Median times from limitations to death also varied by physician's religious affiliation. Decisions were discussed with the families more often if the physician was Protestant (80%), Catholic (70%), had no religious affiliation (66%) or was Jewish (63%).
CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences associated with religious affiliation and culture were observed for the type of end of life decision, the times to therapy limitation and death, and discussion of decisions with patient families.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17541550     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-007-0693-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  29 in total

1.  End-of-life decisions in neonatal intensive care: physicians' self-reported practices in seven European countries. EURONIC Study Group.

Authors:  M Cuttini; M Nadai; M Kaminski; G Hansen; R de Leeuw; S Lenoir; J Persson; M Rebagliato; M Reid; U de Vonderweid; H G Lenard; M Orzalesi; R Saracci
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-06-17       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  End-of-life decisions in ICU and cultural specificities.

Authors:  Frédéric Pochard; Fekri Abroug
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  A national survey of end-of-life care for critically ill patients.

Authors:  T J Prendergast; M T Claessens; J M Luce
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  International differences in end-of-life attitudes in the intensive care unit: results of a survey.

Authors:  Arino Yaguchi; Robert D Truog; J Randall Curtis; John M Luce; Mitchell M Levy; Christian Mélot; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-09-26

5.  Neonatal end-of-life decision making: Physicians' attitudes and relationship with self-reported practices in 10 European countries.

Authors:  M Rebagliato; M Cuttini; L Broggin; I Berbik; U de Vonderweid; G Hansen; M Kaminski; L A Kollée; A Kucinskas; S Lenoir; A Levin; J Persson; M Reid; R Saracci
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers.

Authors:  K E Steinhauser; N A Christakis; E C Clipp; M McNeilly; L McIntyre; J A Tulsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995 Nov 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Acculturation of attitudes toward end-of-life care: a cross-cultural survey of Japanese Americans and Japanese.

Authors:  Shinji Matsumura; Seiji Bito; Honghu Liu; Katharine Kahn; Shunichi Fukuhara; Marjorie Kagawa-Singer; Neil Wenger
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Physician characteristics associated with decisions to withdraw life support.

Authors:  N A Christakis; D A Asch
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Determinants in Canadian health care workers of the decision to withdraw life support from the critically ill. Canadian Critical Care Trials Group.

Authors:  D J Cook; G H Guyatt; R Jaeschke; J Reeve; A Spanier; D King; D W Molloy; A Willan; D L Streiner
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-03-01       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  69 in total

1.  Association between education in EOL care and variability in EOL practice: a survey of ICU physicians.

Authors:  Daniel Neves Forte; Jean Louis Vincent; Irineu Tadeu Velasco; Marcelo Park
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Religion and end-of-life decisions in critical care: where the word meets deed.

Authors:  Dee W Ford
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-04-14       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Pattern of end-of-life decisions in two Tunisian intensive care units: the role of culture and intensivists' training.

Authors:  Islem Ouanes; Néji Stambouli; Fahmi Dachraoui; Lamia Ouanes-Besbes; Samir Toumi; Faouzi Ben Salem; Mourad Gahbiche; Fekri Abroug
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Guidelines and the medical "art".

Authors:  R Tufano; O Piazza; E De Robertis
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  [Decision conflicts with relatives in the intensive care unit].

Authors:  M Ratliff; J-O Neumann
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 0.840

6.  A national survey of Italian physicians' attitudes towards end-of-life decisions following the death of Eluana Englaro.

Authors:  Biagio Solarino; Francesco Bruno; Giacomo Frati; Alessandro Dell'erba; Paola Frati
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 7.  Year in review in Intensive Care Medicine, 2007. III. Ethics and legislation, health services research, pharmacology and toxicology, nutrition and paediatrics.

Authors:  Massimo Antonelli; Elie Azoulay; Marc Bonten; Jean Chastre; Giuseppe Citerio; Giorgio Conti; Daniel De Backer; François Lemaire; Herwig Gerlach; Johan Groeneveld; Goran Hedenstierna; Duncan Macrae; Jordi Mancebo; Salvatore M Maggiore; Alexandre Mebazaa; Philipp Metnitz; Jerôme Pugin; Jan Wernerman; Haibo Zhang
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Reasons, considerations, difficulties and documentation of end-of-life decisions in European intensive care units: the ETHICUS Study.

Authors:  Charles L Sprung; Thomas Woodcock; Peter Sjokvist; Bara Ricou; Hans-Henrik Bulow; Anne Lippert; Paulo Maia; Simon Cohen; Mario Baras; Seppo Hovilehto; Didier Ledoux; Dermot Phelan; Elisabet Wennberg; Wolfgang Schobersberger
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 9.  A systematic review of religious beliefs about major end-of-life issues in the five major world religions.

Authors:  Rajshekhar Chakraborty; Areej R El-Jawahri; Mark R Litzow; Karen L Syrjala; Aric D Parnes; Shahrukh K Hashmi
Journal:  Palliat Support Care       Date:  2017-10

Review 10.  The world's major religions' points of view on end-of-life decisions in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Hans-Henrik Bülow; Charles L Sprung; Konrad Reinhart; Shirish Prayag; Bin Du; Apostolos Armaganidis; Fekri Abroug; Mitchell M Levy
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.