Rajshekhar Chakraborty1, Areej R El-Jawahri2, Mark R Litzow3, Karen L Syrjala4, Aric D Parnes5, Shahrukh K Hashmi3. 1. Hospitalist Services, Essentia Health-St. Joseph's Medical Center,Brainerd,Minnesota. 2. Division of Hematology/Oncology,Massachusetts General Hospital,Boston,Massachusetts. 3. Division of Hematology,Mayo Clinic,Rochester,Minnesota. 4. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences,Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center,Seattle,Washington. 5. Department of Medicine,Brigham and Women's Hospital,Harvard Medical School,Boston,Massachusetts.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the religious/spiritual beliefs of followers of the five major world religions about frequently encountered medical situations at the end of life (EoL). METHOD: This was a systematic review of observational studies on the religious aspects of commonly encountered EoL situations. The databases used for retrieving studies were: Ovid MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid PsycINFO, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus. Observational studies, including surveys from healthcare providers or the general population, and case studies were included for review. Articles written from a purely theoretical or philosophical perspective were excluded. RESULTS: Our search strategy generated 968 references, 40 of which were included for review, while 5 studies were added from reference lists. Whenever possible, we organized the results into five categories that would be clinically meaningful for palliative care practices at the EoL: advanced directives, euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide, physical requirements (artificial nutrition, hydration, and pain management), autopsy practices, and other EoL religious considerations. A wide degree of heterogeneity was observed within religions, depending on the country of origin, level of education, and degree of intrinsic religiosity. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Our review describes the religious practices pertaining to major EoL issues and explains the variations in EoL decision making by clinicians and patients based on their religious teachings and beliefs. Prospective studies with validated tools for religiosity should be performed in the future to assess the impact of religion on EoL care.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the religious/spiritual beliefs of followers of the five major world religions about frequently encountered medical situations at the end of life (EoL). METHOD: This was a systematic review of observational studies on the religious aspects of commonly encountered EoL situations. The databases used for retrieving studies were: Ovid MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid PsycINFO, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus. Observational studies, including surveys from healthcare providers or the general population, and case studies were included for review. Articles written from a purely theoretical or philosophical perspective were excluded. RESULTS: Our search strategy generated 968 references, 40 of which were included for review, while 5 studies were added from reference lists. Whenever possible, we organized the results into five categories that would be clinically meaningful for palliative care practices at the EoL: advanced directives, euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide, physical requirements (artificial nutrition, hydration, and pain management), autopsy practices, and other EoL religious considerations. A wide degree of heterogeneity was observed within religions, depending on the country of origin, level of education, and degree of intrinsic religiosity. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Our review describes the religious practices pertaining to major EoL issues and explains the variations in EoL decision making by clinicians and patients based on their religious teachings and beliefs. Prospective studies with validated tools for religiosity should be performed in the future to assess the impact of religion on EoL care.
Entities:
Keywords:
Advance directives; Artificial nutrition and hydration; Autopsy; End of life; Euthanasia; Pain management; Religion
Authors: A Mark Clarfield; Johanne Monette; Howard Bergman; Michele Monette; Yehoshua Ben-Israel; Yehezkel Caine; Jocelyn Charles; Michael Gordon; Brian Gore Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Tracy Balboni; Michael Balboni; M Elizabeth Paulk; Andrea Phelps; Alexi Wright; John Peteet; Susan Block; Chris Lathan; Tyler Vanderweele; Holly Prigerson Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-05-11 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Matthijs P S van Wijmen; H Roeline W Pasman; Guy A M Widdershoven; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen Journal: J Med Ethics Date: 2014-09-02 Impact factor: 2.903
Authors: George Muishout; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Gerard Wiegers; Ulrike Popp-Baier Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-05-08 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Ian Koper; H Roeline W Pasman; Bart P M Schweitzer; Annemieke Kuin; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2019-11-09 Impact factor: 3.234