Literature DB >> 17538279

Venous reflux on carotid computed tomography angiography: relationship with left-arm injection.

Ying-Chi Tseng1, Hui-Ling Hsu, Tsong-Hai Lee, Chi-Jen Chen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the relationship between image degradation due to the reflux of contrast agent into the major neck veins and use of a left-arm injection site during computed tomographic (CT) angiography of the carotid arteries.
METHODS: A total of 364 patients underwent 4-section carotid CT angiography performed with an injection into the right (n = 183) or left (n = 181) arm. We calculated the volume of refluxed contrast medium and measured the retrosternal distance measured as the shortest distance between the sternum and the arch or its branches. Nine patients underwent follow-up CT angiography weeks later by using the side of injection not used before for comparison.
RESULTS: The amount of refluxed contrast medium was greater with left-arm injection than with right-arm injection (P < 0.001). With left-arm injection, the volume was significantly correlated with the retrosternal distance (r = -0.514, P < 0.001), even after we adjusted for age and sex in the linear regression model (P < 0.001). Five of the 9 patients who received injections in both arms had no reflux of contrast medium, whereas 4 patients had obvious reflux after left-arm but not right-arm injection.
CONCLUSION: Normal compression of the left brachiocephalic vein due to a developmental decreased retrosternal space may degrade carotid CT angiograms because of reflux of contrast material into the cervical veins. This degradation can be avoided if right-arm injection is used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17538279     DOI: 10.1097/01.rct.0000243445.95491.f2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of different volumes of saline flush in the assessment of perivenous artefacts in the subclavian vein during cervical CT angiography.

Authors:  N Takeyama; Y Ohgiya; T Hayashi; T Takahashi; D Takasu; J Nakashima; K Kato; Y Kinebuchi; T Hashimoto; T Gokan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Suboptimal contrast opacification of dynamic head and neck MR angiography due to venous stasis and reflux: technical considerations for optimization.

Authors:  D R Hingwala; B Thomas; C Kesavadas; T R Kapilamoorthy
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Value of MR venography for detection of internal jugular vein anomalies in multiple sclerosis: a pilot longitudinal study.

Authors:  R Zivadinov; R Galeotti; D Hojnacki; E Menegatti; M G Dwyer; C Schirda; A M Malagoni; K Marr; C Kennedy; I Bartolomei; C Magnano; F Salvi; B Weinstock-Guttman; P Zamboni
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  A comparative study of magnetic resonance venography techniques for the evaluation of the internal jugular veins in multiple sclerosis patients.

Authors:  M Tamizur Rahman; Sean K Sethi; David T Utriainen; J Joseph Hewett; E Mark Haacke
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Pseudopathologic brain parenchymal enhancement due to venous reflux from left-sided injection and brachiocephalic vein narrowing.

Authors:  J Y Chen; A C Mamourian; S R Messe; R L Wolf
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 4.966

6.  Intracranial Venous Sinus Reflux on CT Angiography: Benign or Malignant Entity?

Authors:  Raghav Seth; Vikas Bhatia; Chirag Jain; Ajay Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2022-01-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.