Literature DB >> 21474626

Value of MR venography for detection of internal jugular vein anomalies in multiple sclerosis: a pilot longitudinal study.

R Zivadinov1, R Galeotti, D Hojnacki, E Menegatti, M G Dwyer, C Schirda, A M Malagoni, K Marr, C Kennedy, I Bartolomei, C Magnano, F Salvi, B Weinstock-Guttman, P Zamboni.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: CCSVI was recently described in patients with MS. CCSVI is diagnosed noninvasively by Doppler sonography and invasively by catheter venography. We assessed the role of conventional MRV for the detection of IJV anomalies in patients with MS diagnosed with CCSVI and in healthy controls who underwent MRV and Doppler sonography examinations during 6 months.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with MS underwent TOF, TRICKS, Doppler sonography, and catheter venography at baseline. They were treated at baseline with percutaneous angioplasty and re-evaluated 6 months' posttreatment with MRV and Doppler sonography. In addition, 6 healthy controls underwent a baseline and a 6-month follow-up evaluation by Doppler sonography and MRV.
RESULTS: At baseline, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of Doppler sonography for detecting IJV abnormalities relative to catheter venography in patients with MS were calculated, respectively, at 82%, 100%, 99%, and 95%. The figures were 99%, 33%, 33%, 99% for TOF and 99%, 39%, 35%, and 99% for TRICKS. Venous anomalies included the annulus, septum, membrane, and malformed valve. No agreement was found between TOF and catheter venography in 70% of patients with MS and between TRICKS and catheter venography in 60% of patients with MS. At follow-up, 50% of the patients with MS presented with abnormalities on Doppler sonography but only 30% were diagnosed with restenosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Conventional MRV has limited value for assessing IJV anomalies for both diagnostic and posttreatment purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21474626      PMCID: PMC7965543          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  22 in total

1.  How does the blood leave the brain? A systematic ultrasound analysis of cerebral venous drainage patterns.

Authors:  Florian Doepp; Stephan J Schreiber; Thomas von Münster; Jörg Rademacher; Randolf Klingebiel; José M Valdueza
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Physiologic change in flow velocity and direction of dural venous sinuses with respiration: MR venography and flow analysis.

Authors:  Kohsuke Kudo; Satoshi Terae; Aki Ishii; Tokuhiko Omatsu; Takeshi Asano; Khin Khin Tha; Kazuo Miyasaka
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  It's not a cervical lymph node, it's a vein: CT and MR imaging findings in the veins of the head and neck.

Authors:  Edward J Escott; Barton F Branstetter
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  Use of neck magnetic resonance venography, Doppler sonography and selective venography for diagnosis of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency: a pilot study in multiple sclerosis patients and healthy controls.

Authors:  D Hojnacki; P Zamboni; A Lopez-Soriano; R Galleotti; E Menegatti; B Weinstock-Guttman; C Schirda; C Magnano; A M Malagoni; C Kennedy; I Bartolomei; F Salvi; R Zivadinov
Journal:  Int Angiol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.789

5.  Spatial factors for quantifying constant flow velocity in a small tube phantom: comparison of phase-contrast cine-magnetic resonance imaging and the intraluminal Doppler guidewire method.

Authors:  Haruhiko Machida; Yoshiaki Komori; Eiko Ueno; Yun Shen; Masami Hirata; Shinya Kojima; Satoru Morita; Munekuni Sato; Takeshi Okazaki
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 2.374

6.  Diagnostic pitfall: atypical cerebral venous drainage via the vertebral venous system.

Authors:  Olaf Hoffmann; Randolf Klingebiel; Johann S Braun; Juri Katchanov; José M Valdueza
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Compression of the left brachiocephalic vein: cause of high signal intensity of the left sigmoid sinus and internal jugular vein on MR images.

Authors:  T Tanaka; K Uemura; M Takahashi; S Takehara; T Fukaya; T Tokuyama; A Satoh; H Ryu
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: results of an international survey. National Multiple Sclerosis Society (USA) Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials of New Agents in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  F D Lublin; S C Reingold
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 9.  Reinterpreting the magnetic resonance signs of hemodynamic impairment in the brains of multiple sclerosis patients from the perspective of a recent discovery of outflow block in the extracranial veins.

Authors:  Marian Simka; Maciej Zaniewski
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.164

10.  A prospective open-label study of endovascular treatment of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency.

Authors:  Paolo Zamboni; Roberto Galeotti; Erica Menegatti; Anna Maria Malagoni; Sergio Gianesini; Ilaria Bartolomei; Francesco Mascoli; Fabrizio Salvi
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.268

View more
  26 in total

1.  Unclear value of positional MR angiography in evaluating cerebral venous outflow hemodynamics.

Authors:  K Dolic; K Marr; R Zivadinov
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Extracranial venous drainage patterns in patients with multiple sclerosis and healthy controls.

Authors:  R A McTaggart; N J Fischbein; C J Elkins; A Hsiao; M J Cutalo; J Rosenberg; M D Dake; G Zaharchuk
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency in multiple sclerosis: a historical perspective.

Authors:  Michael D Dake; Robert Zivadinov; E Mark Haacke
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2011 Oct-Dec

4.  Sensitivity and specificity for screening of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency using a multimodal non-invasive imaging approach in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  K Dolic; K Marr; V Valnarov; M G Dwyer; E Carl; J Hagemeier; C Kennedy; C Brooks; C Kilanowski; K Hunt; D Hojnacki; B Weinstock-Guttman; R Zivadinov
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2011 Oct-Dec

5.  Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency as a cause of multiple sclerosis: controversy and reality.

Authors:  Claudiu I Diaconu; Devon Conway; Robert J Fox; Alexander Rae-Grant
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2012-04

6.  Screening for chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) using ultrasound: recommendations for a protocol.

Authors:  A N Nicolaides; S Morovic; E Menegatti; G Viselner; P Zamboni
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2011 Oct-Dec

7.  Twist buckling of veins under torsional loading.

Authors:  Justin R Garcia; Arnav Sanyal; Fatemeh Fatemifar; Mohammad Mottahedi; Hai-Chao Han
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Intra- and extraluminal structural and functional venous anomalies in multiple sclerosis, as evidenced by 2 noninvasive imaging techniques.

Authors:  K Dolic; K Marr; V Valnarov; M G Dwyer; E Carl; Y Karmon; C Kennedy; C Brooks; C Kilanowski; K Hunt; A H Siddiqui; D Hojnacki; B Weinstock-Guttman; R Zivadinov
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency: masked multimodal imaging assessment.

Authors:  Staley A Brod; Larry A Kramer; Alan M Cohen; Andrew D Barreto; Thanh-Tung Bui; James R Jemelka; Kelly Ton; John W Lindsey; Flavia Nelson; Ponnada A Narayana; Jerry S Wolinsky
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 6.312

10.  Mystery of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency: identical venographic and ultrasound findings in patients with MS and controls.

Authors:  W McAuliffe; A G Kermode
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.