Literature DB >> 22664786

Spine surgery: Minimally invasive spinal surgery--does size matter?

Richard Mannion.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2012        PMID： 22664786     DOI： 10.1038/nrneurol.2012.113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol        ISSN： 1759-4758            Impact factor:   42.937


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

1.  Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): a randomized trial.

Authors:  James N Weinstein; Tor D Tosteson; Jon D Lurie; Anna N A Tosteson; Brett Hanscom; Jonathan S Skinner; William A Abdu; Alan S Hilibrand; Scott D Boden; Richard A Deyo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Systematic review of randomized trials comparing lumbar fusion surgery to nonoperative care for treatment of chronic back pain.

Authors:  Sohail K Mirza; Richard A Deyo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Alternatives to the randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Stephen G West; Naihua Duan; Willo Pequegnat; Paul Gaist; Don C Des Jarlais; David Holtgrave; José Szapocznik; Martin Fishbein; Bruce Rapkin; Michael Clatts; Patricia Dolan Mullen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Kong Hwee Lee; Wai Mun Yue; William Yeo; Henry Soeharno; Seang Beng Tan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Tubular diskectomy vs conventional microdiskectomy for the treatment of lumbar disk herniation: 2-year results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mark P Arts; Ronald Brand; M Elske van den Akker; Bart W Koes; Ronald H M A Bartels; W F Tan; Wilco C Peul
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 6.  The use of expertise-based randomized controlled trials to assess spinal manipulation and acupuncture for low back pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Bradley C Johnston; Bruno R da Costa; P J Devereaux; Elie A Akl; Jason W Busse
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Surgery versus prolonged conservative treatment for sciatica.

Authors:  Wilco C Peul; Hans C van Houwelingen; Wilbert B van den Hout; Ronald Brand; Just A H Eekhof; Joseph T J Tans; Ralph T W M Thomeer; Bart W Koes
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Tubular diskectomy vs conventional microdiskectomy for sciatica: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mark P Arts; Ronald Brand; M Elske van den Akker; Bart W Koes; Ronald H M A Bartels; Wilco C Peul
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 56.272
  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Spine surgery--approach size does matter.

Authors:  J N Alastair Gibson; Susanne Merk; Menno Iprenburg
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 42.937

2.  Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Attractive Option for Select Failed Backs.

Authors:  Arvind G Kulkarni; Shashidhar Bangalore Kantharajanna; Abhilash N Dhruv
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-02-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.