Literature DB >> 17532805

N1 and the mismatch negativity are spatiotemporally distinct ERP components: disruption of immediate memory by auditory distraction can be related to N1.

Tom Campbell1, István Winkler, Teija Kujala.   

Abstract

Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded for ignored tones presented during the retention interval of a delayed serial recall task. The mismatch negativity (MMN) and N1 ERP components were measured to discern spatiotemporal and functional properties of their generation. A nine-token sequence with nine different tone pitches was more disruptive than an oddball (two-token) sequence, yet this oddball sequence was no more disruptive than a single repeating tone (one-token). Tones of the nine-token sequence elicited augmented N1 amplitudes compared to identical tones delivered in the one-token sequence, yet deviants elicited an additional component (MMN) with distinct temporal properties and topography. These results suggested that MMN and N1 are separate, functionally distinct components. Implications are discussed for the N1 hypothesis and the changing-state hypothesis of the disruption of serial recall performance by auditory distraction.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17532805     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00529.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  19 in total

1.  Method for spatial overlap estimation of electroencephalography and functional magnetic resonance imaging responses.

Authors:  N Heugel; E Liebenthal; S A Beardsley
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Processing Complex Sounds Passing through the Rostral Brainstem: The New Early Filter Model.

Authors:  John E Marsh; Tom A Campbell
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.677

3.  Amplitude by Peak Interaction but No Evidence of Auditory Mismatch Response Deficits to Frequency Change in Preschool-Aged Children with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders.

Authors:  Danielle M Kabella; Lucinda Flynn; Amanda Peters; Piyadasa Kodituwakku; Julia M Stephen
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.455

4.  Methods to eliminate stimulus transduction artifact from insert earphones during electroencephalography.

Authors:  Tom Campbell; Jess R Kerlin; Christopher W Bishop; Lee M Miller
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Touching lips and hearing fingers: effector-specific congruency between tactile and auditory stimulation modulates N1 amplitude and alpha desynchronization.

Authors:  Guannan Shen; Andrew N Meltzoff; Peter J Marshall
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Contextual influences on rapid object categorization in natural scenes.

Authors:  Hsin-Mei Sun; Stephanie L Simon-Dack; Robert D Gordon; Wolfgang A Teder
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Perception of American English vowels by sequential Spanish-English bilinguals.

Authors:  Paula B García; Karen Froud
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2016-09-13

8.  Non-linear laws of echoic memory and auditory change detection in humans.

Authors:  Koji Inui; Tomokazu Urakawa; Koya Yamashiro; Naofumi Otsuru; Makoto Nishihara; Yasuyuki Takeshima; Sumru Keceli; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 3.288

9.  Shared cognitive resources between memory and attention during sound-sequence encoding.

Authors:  Aurélie Bidet-Caulet; Anne Caclin; Salomé Blain; Francesca Talamini; Lesly Fornoni
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Deviance detection by a P3-like response in rat posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Allicia Imada; Allyn Morris; Michael C Wiest
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.