Literature DB >> 17526727

Analysis of transcriptional activation at a distance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Krista C Dobi1, Fred Winston.   

Abstract

Most fundamental aspects of transcription are conserved among eukaryotes. One striking difference between yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and metazoans, however, is the distance over which transcriptional activation occurs. In S. cerevisiae, upstream activation sequences (UASs) are generally located within a few hundred base pairs of a target gene, while in Drosophila and mammals, enhancers are often several kilobases away. To study the potential for long-distance activation in S. cerevisiae, we constructed and analyzed reporters in which the UAS-TATA distance varied. Our results show that UASs lose the ability to activate normal transcription as the UAS-TATA distance increases. Surprisingly, transcription does initiate, but proximally to the UAS, regardless of its location. To identify factors affecting long-distance activation, we screened for mutants allowing activation of a reporter when the UAS-TATA distance is 799 bp. These screens identified four loci, SIN4, SPT2, SPT10, and HTA1-HTB1, with sin4 mutations being the strongest. Our results strongly suggest that long-distance activation in S. cerevisiae is normally limited by Sin4 and other factors and that this constraint plays a role in ensuring UAS-core promoter specificity in the compact S. cerevisiae genome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17526727      PMCID: PMC1952096          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00459-07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  78 in total

1.  Yeast global transcriptional regulators Sin4 and Rgr1 are components of mediator complex/RNA polymerase II holoenzyme.

Authors:  Y Li; S Bjorklund; Y W Jiang; Y J Kim; W S Lane; D J Stillman; R D Kornberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Mechanism of differential utilization of the his3 TR and TC TATA elements.

Authors:  V Iyer; K Struhl
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Mutations that suppress the deletion of an upstream activating sequence in yeast: involvement of a protein kinase and histone H3 in repressing transcription in vivo.

Authors:  G Prelich; F Winston
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  SPT10 and SPT21 are required for transcription of particular histone genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  C Dollard; S L Ricupero-Hovasse; G Natsoulis; J D Boeke; F Winston
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Construction of a set of convenient Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains that are isogenic to S288C.

Authors:  F Winston; C Dollard; S L Ricupero-Hovasse
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.239

6.  Large-scale analysis of gene expression, protein localization, and gene disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  N Burns; B Grimwade; P B Ross-Macdonald; E Y Choi; K Finberg; G S Roeder; M Snyder
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1994-05-01       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  Requirement for RGR1 and SIN4 in RME1-dependent repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  P A Covitz; W Song; A P Mitchell
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Regulation of HIS4 expression by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae SIN4 transcriptional regulator.

Authors:  Y W Jiang; D J Stillman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Genetic and physical interactions between yeast RGR1 and SIN4 in chromatin organization and transcriptional regulation.

Authors:  Y W Jiang; P R Dohrmann; D J Stillman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  New heterologous modules for classical or PCR-based gene disruptions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  A Wach; A Brachat; R Pöhlmann; P Philippsen
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.239

View more
  53 in total

Review 1.  Enhancer-promoter interference and its prevention in transgenic plants.

Authors:  Stacy D Singer; Kerik D Cox; Zongrang Liu
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2010-12-19       Impact factor: 4.570

2.  Comparing enhancer action in cis and in trans.

Authors:  Jack R Bateman; Justine E Johnson; Melissa N Locke
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Transcription through Polycomb response elements does not induce a switch from repression to activation.

Authors:  Judith A Kassis; Jürg Müller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A Role for Mediator Core in Limiting Coactivator Recruitment in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Robert M Yarrington; Yaxin Yu; Chao Yan; Lu Bai; David J Stillman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Long-range communication between the silencers of HMR.

Authors:  Lourdes Valenzuela; Namrita Dhillon; Rudra N Dubey; Marc R Gartenberg; Rohinton T Kamakaka
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 6.  DNA curvature and flexibility in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Justin P Peters; L James Maher
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 5.318

Review 7.  Functional and mechanistic diversity of distal transcription enhancers.

Authors:  Michael Bulger; Mark Groudine
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Analysis of Polygenic Mutants Suggests a Role for Mediator in Regulating Transcriptional Activation Distance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Caitlin T Reavey; Mark J Hickman; Krista C Dobi; David Botstein; Fred Winston
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 9.  Chromatin loops in gene regulation.

Authors:  Stephan Kadauke; Gerd A Blobel
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2008-07-15

10.  Most "dark matter" transcripts are associated with known genes.

Authors:  Harm van Bakel; Corey Nislow; Benjamin J Blencowe; Timothy R Hughes
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.