Literature DB >> 17525838

[What is the value of minimizing access trauma for patients?].

P Hildebrand1, U J Roblick, R Keller, M Kleemann, L Mirow, H-P Bruch.   

Abstract

Minimizing the access trauma of surgical interventions is becoming an essential task in modern surgery in order to make the treatment more comfortable for the patient. Minimally invasive surgery has had a major impact on the improvement of surgical results over the last decade. This is why such surgery is often named as the third patient friendly revolution in surgery after the introduction of asepsis and anesthesia. Operations that caused a huge strain on the patients in the past and led to immense costs for society because of the patient's lost working time and extensive rehabilitation, have lost their fear thanks to this technique. The physical strain is lower, the cosmetic effect is considerable and the costs for society might be reduced due to the significantly shorter duration of convalescence. Despite its known advantages, which have been reported in numerous studies, minimally invasive surgery has recently gained increased interest because of the installation of new accounting systems as well as strict budgeting and restricted resources. Realistic cost-benefit analysis and objectified quality controls are needed in order to guarantee innovative and patient friendly basic approaches in medicine in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17525838     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-007-1348-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  21 in total

1.  Pulmonary function after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy.

Authors:  S Hasukić; D Mesić; E Dizdarević; D Keser; S Hadziselimović; M Bazardzanović
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-10-19       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.

Authors:  F Keus; J A F de Jong; H G Gooszen; C J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

3.  Respiratory function after laparoscopic and open fundoplication.

Authors:  M F Olsén; K Josefson; J Dalenbäck; L Lundell; H Lönroth
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1997-09

4.  Role of microlaparoscopy in the diagnosis of peritoneal and visceral adhesions and in the prevention of bowel injury associated with blind trocar insertion.

Authors:  A J Audebert; V Gomel
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Comparison of costs between laparoscopic and open Nissen fundoplication: a prospective randomized study with a 3-month followup.

Authors:  T J Heikkinen; K Haukipuro; P Koivukangas; A Sorasto; R Autio; H Södervik; H Mäkelä; A Hulkko
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Laparoscopic and open anterior resection for upper and mid rectal cancer: an evaluation of outcomes.

Authors:  Wai Lun Law; Yee Man Lee; Hok Kwok Choi; Chi Leung Seto; Judy W C Ho
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Adhesions: laparoscopic surgery versus laparotomy.

Authors:  S Milingos; G Kallipolitis; D Loutradis; A Liapi; K Mavrommatis; P Drakakis; J Tourikis; G Creatsas; S Michalas
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised trial to compare postoperative pain, pulmonary function, and stress response.

Authors:  H I Hendolin; M E Pääkönen; E M Alhava; R Tarvainen; T Kemppinen; P Lahtinen
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  2000-05

Review 9.  Evaluation of quality of life after laparoscopic surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  D Korolija; S Sauerland; S Wood-Dauphinée; C C Abbou; E Eypasch; M García Caballero; M A Lumsden; B Millat; J R T Monson; G Nilsson; R Pointner; W Schwenk; A Shamiyeh; A Szold; E Targarona; B Ure; E Neugebauer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Adhesion formation after laparoscopic surgery in tubal pregnancy: a randomized trial versus laparotomy.

Authors:  P Lundorff; M Hahlin; B Källfelt; J Thorburn; B Lindblom
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  5 in total

1.  Transoral endoscopic neck surgery: feasibility and safety in a porcine model based on the example of thymectomy.

Authors:  Thomas Wilhelm; Tahar Benhidjeb
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  [Value of laparoscopic liver resection].

Authors:  M R Schön
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Prospective evaluation of transvaginal assisted cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Dietmar Borchert; Matthias Federlein; Oskar Rückbeil; Jens Burghardt; Frauke Fritze; Klaus Gellert
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Endoscopic minimally invasive thyroidectomy (eMIT): a prospective proof-of-concept study in humans.

Authors:  Thomas Wilhelm; Andreas Metzig
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Feasibility and Technique for Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery Liver Resection: A Porcine Model.

Authors:  Toshio Katagiri; Yuichiro Otsuka; Santiago Horgan; Bryan J Sandler; Garth R Jacobsen; Alisa M Coker; Masaru Tsuchiya; Tetsuya Maeda; Hironori Kaneko
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.719

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.