Literature DB >> 17524728

The interdependence between screening methods and screening libraries.

Anang A Shelat1, R Kiplin Guy.   

Abstract

The most common methods for discovery of chemical compounds capable of manipulating biological function involves some form of screening. The success of such screens is highly dependent on the chemical materials - commonly referred to as libraries - that are assayed. Classic methods for the design of screening libraries have depended on knowledge of target structure and relevant pharmacophores for target focus, and on simple count-based measures to assess other properties. The recent proliferation of two novel screening paradigms, structure-based screening and high-content screening, prompts a profound rethink about the ideal composition of small-molecule screening libraries. We suggest that currently utilized libraries are not optimal for addressing new targets by high-throughput screening, or complex phenotypes by high-content screening.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17524728     DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2007.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol        ISSN: 1367-5931            Impact factor:   8.822


  20 in total

1.  Grand challenge commentary: Accessing new chemical space for 'undruggable' targets.

Authors:  Sivaraman Dandapani; Lisa A Marcaurelle
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 15.040

2.  A road less traveled by: exploring a decade of Ellman chemistry.

Authors:  Anang A Shelat; R Kiplin Guy
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Novel chemical space exploration via natural products.

Authors:  Josefin Rosén; Johan Gottfries; Sorel Muresan; Anders Backlund; Tudor I Oprea
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Fragment-based domain shuffling approach for the synthesis of pyran-based macrocycles.

Authors:  Eamon Comer; Haibo Liu; Adrien Joliton; Alexandre Clabaut; Christopher Johnson; Lakshmi B Akella; Lisa A Marcaurelle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The tert-butylsulfinamide lynchpin in transition-metal-mediated multiscaffold library synthesis.

Authors:  Renato A Bauer; Christine M DiBlasi; Derek S Tan
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 6.005

Review 6.  Expanding the range of 'druggable' targets with natural product-based libraries: an academic perspective.

Authors:  Renato A Bauer; Jacqueline M Wurst; Derek S Tan
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 7.  Fragment-based approaches to enzyme inhibition.

Authors:  Alessio Ciulli; Chris Abell
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 9.740

8.  Chemical genetics of Plasmodium falciparum.

Authors:  W Armand Guiguemde; Anang A Shelat; David Bouck; Sandra Duffy; Gregory J Crowther; Paul H Davis; David C Smithson; Michele Connelly; Julie Clark; Fangyi Zhu; María B Jiménez-Díaz; María S Martinez; Emily B Wilson; Abhai K Tripathi; Jiri Gut; Elizabeth R Sharlow; Ian Bathurst; Farah El Mazouni; Joseph W Fowble; Isaac Forquer; Paula L McGinley; Steve Castro; Iñigo Angulo-Barturen; Santiago Ferrer; Philip J Rosenthal; Joseph L Derisi; David J Sullivan; John S Lazo; David S Roos; Michael K Riscoe; Margaret A Phillips; Pradipsinh K Rathod; Wesley C Van Voorhis; Vicky M Avery; R Kiplin Guy
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  Systematizing serendipity for cardiovascular drug discovery.

Authors:  Peter J Schlueter; Randall T Peterson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Integrating virtual and biochemical screening for protein tyrosine phosphatase inhibitor discovery.

Authors:  Katie R Martin; Pooja Narang; José L Medina-Franco; Nathalie Meurice; Jeffrey P MacKeigan
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 3.608

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.