Literature DB >> 17524457

Molecular modeling and mutagenesis of gap junction channels.

Julio A Kovacs1, Kent A Baker, Guillermo A Altenberg, Ruben Abagyan, Mark Yeager.   

Abstract

Gap junction channels connect the cytoplasms of adjacent cells through the end-to-end docking of hexameric hemichannels called connexons. Each connexon is formed by a ring of 24 alpha-helices that are staggered by 30 degrees with respect to those in the apposed connexon. Current evidence suggests that the two connexons are docked by interdigitated, anti-parallel beta strands across the extracellular gap. The second extracellular loop, E2, guides selectivity in docking between connexons formed by different isoforms. There is considerably more sequence variability of the N-terminal portion of E2, suggesting that this region dictates connexon coupling. Mutagenesis, biochemical, dye-transfer and electrophysiological data, combined with computational studies, have suggested possible assignments for the four transmembrane alpha-helices within each subunit. Most current models assign M3 as the major pore-lining helix. Mapping of human mutations onto a C(alpha) model suggested that native helix packing is important for the formation of fully functional channels. Nevertheless, a mutant in which the M4 helix has been replaced with polyalanine is functional, suggesting that M4 is located on the perimeter of the channel. In spite of this substantial progress in understanding the structural biology of gap junction channels, an experimentally determined structure at atomic resolution will be essential to confirm these concepts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17524457      PMCID: PMC2819402          DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2007.03.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol        ISSN: 0079-6107            Impact factor:   3.667


  66 in total

1.  The permeability of gap junction channels to probes of different size is dependent on connexin composition and permeant-pore affinities.

Authors:  Paul A Weber; Hou-Chien Chang; Kris E Spaeth; Johannes M Nitsche; Bruce J Nicholson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  A Calpha model for the transmembrane alpha helices of gap junction intercellular channels.

Authors:  Sarel J Fleishman; Vinzenz M Unger; Mark Yeager; Nir Ben-Tal
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2004-09-24       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  Cloning and functional expression of invertebrate connexins from Halocynthia pyriformis.

Authors:  Thomas W White; Huan Wang; Rickie Mui; Jennifer Litteral; Peter R Brink
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2004-11-05       Impact factor: 4.124

Review 4.  Junctional intercellular communication: the cell-to-cell membrane channel.

Authors:  W R Loewenstein
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 37.312

5.  Two configurations of a channel-forming membrane protein.

Authors:  P N Unwin; P D Ennis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1984 Feb 16-22       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Structural changes in the carboxyl terminus of the gap junction protein connexin43 indicates signaling between binding domains for c-Src and zonula occludens-1.

Authors:  Paul L Sorgen; Heather S Duffy; Prangya Sahoo; Wanda Coombs; Mario Delmar; David C Spray
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-10-18       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Topology of the 32-kd liver gap junction protein determined by site-directed antibody localizations.

Authors:  L C Milks; N M Kumar; R Houghten; N Unwin; N B Gilula
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Cloning and characterization of human and rat liver cDNAs coding for a gap junction protein.

Authors:  N M Kumar; N B Gilula
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Connexin43: a protein from rat heart homologous to a gap junction protein from liver.

Authors:  E C Beyer; D L Paul; D A Goodenough
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  The 43-kD polypeptide of heart gap junctions: immunolocalization, topology, and functional domains.

Authors:  S B Yancey; S A John; R Lal; B J Austin; J P Revel
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Gap junction channel structure in the early 21st century: facts and fantasies.

Authors:  Mark Yeager; Andrew L Harris
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 8.382

Review 2.  Biological and biophysical properties of vascular connexin channels.

Authors:  Scott Johnstone; Brant Isakson; Darren Locke
Journal:  Int Rev Cell Mol Biol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.813

Review 3.  Regulation of cellular communication by signaling microdomains in the blood vessel wall.

Authors:  Marie Billaud; Alexander W Lohman; Scott R Johnstone; Lauren A Biwer; Stephanie Mutchler; Brant E Isakson
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 25.468

Review 4.  Antibodies targeting extracellular domain of connexins for studies of hemichannels.

Authors:  Manuel A Riquelme; Rekha Kar; Sumin Gu; Jean X Jiang
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 5.250

5.  Replacement of a single cysteine in the fourth transmembrane region of zebrafish pannexin 1 alters hemichannel gating behavior.

Authors:  Nora Prochnow; Sarah Hoffmann; Rolf Dermietzel; Georg Zoidl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Connexin26 deafness associated mutations show altered permeability to large cationic molecules.

Authors:  Gülistan Meşe; Virginijus Valiunas; Peter R Brink; Thomas W White
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 4.249

7.  Expanded spectrum of Pelizaeus-Merzbacher-like disease: literature revision and description of a novel GJC2 mutation in an unusually severe form.

Authors:  Roberta Biancheri; Camillo Rosano; Laura Denegri; Eleonora Lamantea; Francesca Pinto; Federica Lanza; Mariasavina Severino; Mirella Filocamo
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 8.  Accessing gap-junction channel structure-function relationships through molecular modeling and simulations.

Authors:  F Villanelo; Y Escalona; C Pareja-Barrueto; J A Garate; I M Skerrett; T Perez-Acle
Journal:  BMC Cell Biol       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  The 3.5 ångström X-ray structure of the human connexin26 gap junction channel is unlikely that of a fully open channel.

Authors:  Francesco Zonta; Guido Polles; Maria Federica Sanasi; Mario Bortolozzi; Fabio Mammano
Journal:  Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 5.712

10.  A fully atomistic model of the Cx32 connexon.

Authors:  Sergio Pantano; Francesco Zonta; Fabio Mammano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.