Literature DB >> 17520736

Contrast-dose relation in first-pass myocardial MR perfusion imaging.

Wolfgang Utz1, Thoralf Niendorf, Ralf Wassmuth, Daniel Messroghli, Rainer Dietz, Jeanette Schulz-Menger.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the regime of linear contrast enhancement in human first-pass perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging to improve accuracy in myocardial perfusion quantification.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 10 healthy subjects were studied on a clinical 1.5T MR scanner. Seven doses of Gd-DTPA ranging from 0.00125 to 0.1 mmol/kg of body weight (b.w.) were administered as equal volumes by rapid bolus injection (6 mL/second). Resting periods of 15 minutes were introduced after delivery of Gd doses >0.01 mmol/kg b.w. For each subject, two series of rest perfusion scans were performed using two different multislice saturation-recovery perfusion sequences. Maximum contrast enhancement and maximum upslope were obtained in the blood pool of the left ventricular (LV) cavity and in the myocardium. The range of linear contrast-dose relation was determined by linear regression analysis.
RESULTS: MR signal intensity increased linearly for contrast agent concentrations up to 0.01 mmol/kg b.w. in the LV blood pool and up to 0.05 mmol/kg b.w. in the myocardium. For Gd concentrations exceeding these thresholds the signal intensity response was not linear with respect to the contrast agent dose.
CONCLUSION: Quantitative evaluation of cardiac MR perfusion data needs to account for signal saturation in both the LV blood pool and the myocardium. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17520736     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20910

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  20 in total

1.  Free-breathing cardiac MR stress perfusion with real-time slice tracking.

Authors:  Tamer A Basha; Sébastien Roujol; Kraig V Kissinger; Beth Goddu; Sophie Berg; Warren J Manning; Reza Nezafat
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Impact of baseline calibration on semiquantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion reserve by adenosine stress MRI.

Authors:  Andreas Seitz; Giancarlo Pirozzolo; Udo Sechtem; Raffi Bekeredjian; Peter Ong; Heiko Mahrholdt
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  BOLD cardiac MRI for differentiating reversible and irreversible myocardial damage in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Bing-Hua Chen; Ruo-Yang Shi; Dong-Aolei An; Rui Wu; Chong-Wen Wu; Jiani Hu; Amanda Manly; Hisham Kaddurah; Jie He; Jun Pu; Jian-Rong Xu; Lian-Ming Wu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Automatic postprocessing for the assessment of quantitative human myocardial perfusion using MRI.

Authors:  Andreas Max Weng; Christian Oliver Ritter; Joachim Lotz; Meinrad Joachim Beer; Dietbert Hahn; Herbert Köstler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Four-dimensional transcatheter intraarterial perfusion (TRIP)-MRI for monitoring liver tumor embolization in VX2 rabbits.

Authors:  Dingxin Wang; Sumeet Virmani; Richard Tang; Barbara Szolc-Kowalska; Gayle Woloschak; Reed A Omary; Andrew C Larson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 6.  Quantification of myocardial perfusion by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Michael Jerosch-Herold
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 5.364

7.  Quantitative 3D myocardial perfusion with an efficient arterial input function.

Authors:  Jason Kraig Mendes; Ganesh Adluru; Devavrat Likhite; Merlin J Fair; Peter D Gatehouse; Ye Tian; Apoorva Pedgaonkar; Brent Wilson; Edward V R DiBella
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Towards a five-minute comprehensive cardiac MR examination using highly accelerated parallel imaging with a 32-element coil array: feasibility and initial comparative evaluation.

Authors:  Jian Xu; Daniel Kim; Ricardo Otazo; Monvadi B Srichai; Ruth P Lim; Leon Axel; Kelly Anne Mcgorty; Thoralf Niendorf; Daniel K Sodickson
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 9.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance physics for clinicians: Part II.

Authors:  John D Biglands; Aleksandra Radjenovic; John P Ridgway
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Estimating myocardial perfusion from dynamic contrast-enhanced CMR with a model-independent deconvolution method.

Authors:  Nathan A Pack; Edward V R DiBella; Thomas C Rust; Dan J Kadrmas; Christopher J McGann; Regan Butterfield; Paul E Christian; John M Hoffman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.