Literature DB >> 17520353

Competences, education and support for new roles in cancer genetics services: outcomes from the cancer genetics pilot projects.

Catherine Bennett1, Hilary Burton, Peter Farndon.   

Abstract

In 2004 the Department of Health in collaboration with Macmillan Cancer Support set up service development projects to pilot the integration of genetics in mainstream medicine in the area of cancer genetics.In developing these services, new roles and responsibilities were devised that required supporting programmes of education and training. The NHS National Genetics Education and Development Centre has worked with the projects to draw together their experience in these aspects. New roles include the Cancer Family Nurse Specialist, in which a nurse working in a cancer setting was trained to identify and manage genetic or family history concerns, and the Genetic Risk Assessment Practitioner--a small team of practitioners working within a secondary care setting to deliver a standardised risk assessment pathway. Existing roles were also adapted for a different setting, in particular the use of genetic counsellors working in a community ethnic minority setting. These practitioners undertook a range of clinical activities that can be mapped directly to the 'UK National Workforce Competences for Genetics in Clinical Practice for Non-genetics Healthcare Staff' framework developed by Skills for Health and the NHS National Genetics Education and Development Centre (2007; draft competence framework). The main differences between the various roles were in the ordering of genetic tests and the provision of advice on invasive preventive options such as mastectomy. Those involved in service development also needed to develop competences in project management, business skills, audit and evaluation, working with users, general management (personnel, multi-agency work and marketing), educational supervision, IT, public and professional outreach, and research. Important resources to support the development of new roles and competences included pathways and guidelines, a formal statement of competences, a recognised syllabus, appropriate and timely courses, the availability of a mentor, supervision and opportunities to discuss cases, a formal assessment of learning and continuing support from specialist genetics services. This represents a current resource gap that will be of concern to cancer networks and a challenge to providers of educational resources and regional genetics services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17520353     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-007-9127-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  4 in total

1.  Preparing for the future: the status of genetics education in diploma-level training courses for nurses in the UK.

Authors:  M Kirk
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.442

Review 2.  Effective e-learning for health professionals and students--barriers and their solutions. A systematic review of the literature--findings from the HeXL project.

Authors:  Sue Childs; Elizabeth Blenkinsopp; Amanda Hall; Graham Walton
Journal:  Health Info Libr J       Date:  2005-12

3.  Postregistration genetics education provision for nurses, midwives and health visitors in the UK.

Authors:  Alison Metcalfe; Hilary Burton
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.187

4.  A "neglected part of the curriculum" or "of limited use"? Views on genetics training by nongenetics medical trainees and implications for delivery.

Authors:  Sarah Burke; Anna Stone; Julie Bedward; Hywel Thomas; Peter Farndon
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 8.822

  4 in total
  7 in total

1.  Integrating genetic and genomic information into effective cancer care in diverse populations.

Authors:  L Fashoyin-Aje; K Sanghavi; K Bjornard; J Bodurtha
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Talking to children about maternal BRCA1/2 genetic test results: a qualitative study of parental perceptions and advice.

Authors:  Andrea Farkas Patenaude; Tiffani A DeMarco; Beth N Peshkin; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Judy E Garber; Katherine A Schneider; Larissa Hewitt; Jennifer Hamilton; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  A toolkit for incorporating genetics into mainstream medical services: Learning from service development pilots in England.

Authors:  Catherine L Bennett; Sarah E Burke; Hilary Burton; Peter A Farndon
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Mentoring nurses in familial cancer risk assessment and counseling: lessons learned from a formative evaluation.

Authors:  Agnes Masny; Mary E Ropka; Candace Peterson; Dominique Fetzer; Mary B Daly
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-01-26       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 5.  The role of the genetic counsellor: a systematic review of research evidence.

Authors:  Heather Skirton; Christophe Cordier; Charlotta Ingvoldstad; Nicolas Taris; Caroline Benjamin
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 4.246

6.  Genetics education for health professionals: strategies and outcomes from a national initiative in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Peter A Farndon; Catherine Bennett
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-02-05       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  A primary care specialist genetics service: a cluster-randomised factorial trial.

Authors:  Greta Westwood; Ruth Pickering; Sue Latter; Paul Little; Karen Gerard; Anneke Lucassen; I Karen Temple
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.386

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.