Literature DB >> 17518379

Haptic interaction in robot-assisted endoscopic surgery: a sensorized end-effector.

M Tavakoli1, R V Patel, M Moallem.   

Abstract

Conventional endoscopic surgery has some drawbacks that can be addressed by using robots. The robotic systems used for surgery are still in their infancy. A major deficiency is the lack of haptic feedback to the surgeon. In this paper, the benefits of haptic feedback in robot-assisted surgery are discussed. A novel robotic end-effector is then described that meets the requirements of endoscopic surgery and is sensorized for force/ torque feedback. The endoscopic end-effector is capable of non-invasively measuring its interaction with tissue in all the degrees of freedom available during endoscopic manipulation. It is also capable of remotely actuating a tip and measuring its interaction with the environment without using any sensors on the jaws. The sensorized end-effector can be used as the last arm of a surgical robot to incorporate haptic feedback and/or to evaluate skills and learning curves of residents and surgeons in endoscopic surgery. Copyright 2005 Robotic Publications Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 17518379     DOI: 10.1002/rcs.16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Robot        ISSN: 1478-5951            Impact factor:   2.547


  13 in total

1.  Methods and mechanisms for contact feedback in a robot-assisted minimally invasive environment.

Authors:  M Tavakoli; A Aziminejad; R V Patel; M Moallem
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A grip force model for the da Vinci end-effector to predict a compensation force.

Authors:  Chiwon Lee; Yong Hyun Park; Chiyul Yoon; Seungwoo Noh; Choonghee Lee; Youdan Kim; Hee Chan Kim; Hyeon Hoe Kim; Sungwan Kim
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Features of haptic and tactile feedback in TORS-a comparison of available surgical systems.

Authors:  Daniel T Friedrich; L Dürselen; B Mayer; S Hacker; F Schall; J Hahn; T K Hoffmann; P J Schuler; J Greve
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-05-03

4.  Object manipulation improvements due to single session training outweigh the differences among stimulation sites during vibrotactile feedback.

Authors:  Cara E Stepp; Yoky Matsuoka
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 5.  [Robot-assisted surgery in the head and neck region].

Authors:  T K Hoffmann; D T Friedrich; P J Schuler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Micron: an Actively Stabilized Handheld Tool for Microsurgery.

Authors:  Robert A Maclachlan; Brian C Becker; Jaime Cuevas Tabarés; Gregg W Podnar; Louis A Lobes; Cameron N Riviere
Journal:  IEEE Trans Robot       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 5.567

Review 7.  Prevalence of haptic feedback in robot-mediated surgery: a systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Farshid Amirabdollahian; Salvatore Livatino; Behrad Vahedi; Radhika Gudipati; Patrick Sheen; Shan Gawrie-Mohan; Nikhil Vasdev
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-12-01

8.  Telerobotic-assisted bone-drilling system using bilateral control with feed operation scaling and cutting force scaling.

Authors:  Yusuke Kasahara; Hiromasa Kawana; Shin Usuda; Kouhei Ohnishi
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 2.547

9.  Magnetorheological Fluids Actuated Haptic-Based Teleoperated Catheter Operating System.

Authors:  Xuanchun Yin; Shuxiang Guo; Yu Song
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 2.891

Review 10.  The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review.

Authors:  O A J van der Meijden; M P Schijven
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.