Literature DB >> 16897288

Methods and mechanisms for contact feedback in a robot-assisted minimally invasive environment.

M Tavakoli1, A Aziminejad, R V Patel, M Moallem.   

Abstract

Providing a surgeon with information regarding contacts made between instruments and tissue during robot-assisted interventions can improve task efficiency and reliability. In this report, different methods for feedback of such information to the surgeon are discussed. It is hypothesized that various methods of contact feedback have the potential to enhance performance in a robot-assisted minimally invasive environment. To verify the hypothesis, novel mechanisms needed for incorporating contact feedback were designed, including a surgeon-robot interface with full force feedback capabilities and a surgical end-effector with full force sensing capabilities, that are suitable for minimally invasive applications. These two mechanisms were used to form a robotic "master-slave" test bed for studying the effect of contact feedback on the system and user performance. Using the master-slave system, experiments for surgical tasks involving soft tissue palpation were conducted. The performance of the master-slave system was validated in terms of criteria that assess the accurate transmission of task-related information to the surgeon, which is critical in the context of soft tissue surgical applications. Moreover, using a set of experiments involving human subjects, the performance of several users in carrying out the task was compared among different methods of contact feedback.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16897288     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-005-0582-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  14 in total

Review 1.  Robotics for surgery.

Authors:  R D Howe; Y Matsuoka
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 9.590

2.  Bilateral control of master-slave manipulators for ideal kinesthetic coupling--formulation and experiment.

Authors:  Y Yokokohji; T Yoshikawa
Journal:  IEEE Trans Rob Autom       Date:  1994-10

Review 3.  Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Review of early clinical results.

Authors:  G H Ballantyne
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-07-29       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Stereoscopic vision provides a significant advantage for precision robotic laparoscopy.

Authors:  I C Jourdan; E Dutson; A Garcia; T Vleugels; J Leroy; D Mutter; J Marescaux
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Force modeling for needle insertion into soft tissue.

Authors:  Allison M Okamura; Christina Simone; Mark D O'Leary
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Effect of sensory substitution on suture-manipulation forces for robotic surgical systems.

Authors:  Masaya Kitagawa; Daniell Dokko; Allison M Okamura; David D Yuh
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  What can the operator actually feel when performing a laparoscopy?

Authors:  G Picod; A C Jambon; D Vinatier; P Dubois
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  The revolution of computer-aided surgery - the dawn of robotic surgery.

Authors: 
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.442

9.  Perceptual-motor coordination in an endoscopic surgery simulation.

Authors:  J G Holden; J M Flach; Y Donchin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Robot-assisted versus standard videoscopic aortic replacement. A comparative study in pigs.

Authors:  J P Ruurda; W Wisselink; M A Cuesta; H J M Verhagen; I A M J Broeders
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 7.069

View more
  4 in total

1.  A comparative study between an improved novel air-cushion sensor and a wheeled probe for minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Dinusha Zbyszewski; Benjamin Challacombe; Jichun Li; Lakmal Seneviratne; Kaspar Althoefer; Prokar Dasgupta; Declan Murphy
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 2.  Haptic feedback in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Allison M Okamura
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.309

3.  Impact of haptic feedback on applied intracorporeal forces using a novel surgical robotic system-a randomized cross-over study with novices in an experimental setup.

Authors:  Johanna Miller; Manuel Braun; Johannes Bilz; Sebastian Matich; Carsten Neupert; Wolfgang Kunert; Andreas Kirschniak
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  DNN-Based Assistant in Laparoscopic Computer-Aided Palpation.

Authors:  Tomohiro Fukuda; Yoshihiro Tanaka; Michitaka Fujiwara; Akihito Sano
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2018-06-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.