Literature DB >> 17516058

Prehension is really reaching and grasping.

Cornelis van de Kamp1, Frank T J M Zaal.   

Abstract

Prehension has traditionally been seen as the act of coordinated reaching and grasping. However, recently, Smeets and Brenner (in Motor Control 3:237-271, 1999) proposed that we might just as well look at prehension as the combination of two independently moving digits. The hand aperture that has featured prominently in many studies on prehension, according to Smeets and Brenner's "double-pointing hypothesis", is really an emergent property related to the time course of the positions of the two digits moving to their respective end points. We tested this double-pointing hypothesis by perturbing the end position of one of the digits while leaving the end position of the opposing digit unchanged. To this end, we had participants reach for and grasp a metallic object of which the side surfaces could be made to slide in and out. We administered the perturbation right after movement initiation. On several occasions, after perturbing the end position of one digit, we found effects also on the kinematics of the opposing digit. These findings are in conflict with Smeets and Brenner's double-pointing hypothesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17516058     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-0968-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  32 in total

1.  On taking the grasping out of prehension.

Authors:  K M Newell; P Cesari
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.422

2.  The scaling of human grip configurations.

Authors:  P Cesari; K M Newell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Body-scaled transitions in human grip configurations.

Authors:  P Cesari; K M Newell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  On the hand transport component of prehensile movements.

Authors:  P Haggard; A Wing
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.328

Review 5.  Independent control of the digits predicts an apparent hierarchy of visuomotor channels in grasping.

Authors:  Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner; Marianne Biegstraaten
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Body-scaled ratio as a control parameter for prehension in 5- to 9-year-old children.

Authors:  J van der Kamp; G J Savelsbergh; W E Davis
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.038

7.  Visual guidance of walking through apertures: body-scaled information for affordances.

Authors:  W H Warren; S Whang
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Reach to grasp: the natural response to perturbation of object size.

Authors:  U Castiello; K M Bennett; G E Stelmach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Perceiving affordances: visual guidance of stair climbing.

Authors:  W H Warren
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model.

Authors:  T Flash; N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  15 in total

1.  Direction-dependent differences in temporal kinematics for vertical prehension movements.

Authors:  Shinji Yamamoto; Keisuke Kushiro
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Non-obstructing 3D depth cues influence reach-to-grasp kinematics.

Authors:  Christopher J Worssam; Lewis C Meade; Jason D Connolly
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Coordination of pincer grasp and transport after mechanical perturbation of the index finger.

Authors:  Luis F Schettino; Sergei V Adamovich; Eugene Tunik
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  An involuntary stereotypical grasp tendency pervades voluntary dynamic multifinger manipulation.

Authors:  Kornelius Rácz; Daniel Brown; Francisco J Valero-Cuevas
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Discovering affordances that determine the spatial structure of reach-to-grasp movements.

Authors:  Mark Mon-Williams; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Grasping and hitting moving objects.

Authors:  Willemijn D Schot; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Similarities between digits' movements in grasping, touching and pushing.

Authors:  Jeroen B J Smeets; Juul Martin; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Contact points during multidigit grasping of geometric objects.

Authors:  René Gilster; Constanze Hesse; Heiner Deubel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  The cognitive neuroscience of prehension: recent developments.

Authors:  Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Grasping time does not influence the early adherence of aperture shaping to Weber's law.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Scott A Holmes; Ali Mulla; Gordon Binsted
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.