Literature DB >> 10409801

On taking the grasping out of prehension.

K M Newell1, P Cesari.   

Abstract

Smeets and Brenner provide a very clear and useful statement of the work that has been stimulated by Jeannerod's 1984 paper but seem more concerned about the viability of model fitting than model assumptions. The theoretical and practical limitations of viewing "grasping as nothing more than pointing" are noted. We reemphasize the importance in prehension of the union of the hand with the object in the act of realizing a task goal.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10409801     DOI: 10.1123/mcj.3.3.285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Motor Control        ISSN: 1087-1640            Impact factor:   1.422


  4 in total

1.  Influences of Clinician Technique on Performance and Interpretation of the Lachman Test.

Authors:  Wendy L. Hurley; D Thompson McGuire
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Prehension is really reaching and grasping.

Authors:  Cornelis van de Kamp; Frank T J M Zaal
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Contact points during multidigit grasping of geometric objects.

Authors:  René Gilster; Constanze Hesse; Heiner Deubel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Movements of individual digits in bimanual prehension are coupled into a grasping component.

Authors:  Frank T J M Zaal; Raoul M Bongers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.