PURPOSE: Breast cancer in very young women (age < 35 years) is uncommon and poorly understood. We sought to evaluate the prognosis and treatment response of these patients compared with women ages 35 to 50 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed data from 9,885 breast cancer patients age < or = 50 years who were part of the Korean Breast Cancer Society registration program between 1992 and 2001. The overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were compared between age groups. RESULTS: One thousand four hundred forty-four patients (14.6%) were younger than age 35 and 8,441 (85.4%) patients were between 35 and 50 years of age. Younger patients had significantly higher T-stage and higher lymph node positivity and lower hormone receptor expression than older patients. Younger patients had a greater probability of death than older patients, regardless of tumor size or lymph node status. The survival difference was significant for patients with positive or unknown hormone receptor status (P < .0001), but not for patients with negative hormone receptor status. In a multivariate analysis, the interaction term of young age and hormone receptor positivity was significant for OS and BCSS with a hazard ratio for OS of 2.13 (95% CI, 1.52 to 2.98). The significant survival benefit from adjuvant hormone therapy after chemotherapy observed in older patients (hazard ratio for OS, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.79; P = .001) could not be seen in younger patients (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Younger patients (age < 35) showed worse prognosis than older patients (age, 35 to 50 years) only in the hormone receptor-unknown or hormone receptor-positive subgroups. Adjuvant tamoxifen therapy might provide less survival benefit when added to chemotherapy in very young breast cancer patients.
PURPOSE:Breast cancer in very young women (age < 35 years) is uncommon and poorly understood. We sought to evaluate the prognosis and treatment response of these patients compared with women ages 35 to 50 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed data from 9,885 breast cancerpatients age < or = 50 years who were part of the Korean Breast Cancer Society registration program between 1992 and 2001. The overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were compared between age groups. RESULTS: One thousand four hundred forty-four patients (14.6%) were younger than age 35 and 8,441 (85.4%) patients were between 35 and 50 years of age. Younger patients had significantly higher T-stage and higher lymph node positivity and lower hormone receptor expression than older patients. Younger patients had a greater probability of death than older patients, regardless of tumor size or lymph node status. The survival difference was significant for patients with positive or unknown hormone receptor status (P < .0001), but not for patients with negative hormone receptor status. In a multivariate analysis, the interaction term of young age and hormone receptor positivity was significant for OS and BCSS with a hazard ratio for OS of 2.13 (95% CI, 1.52 to 2.98). The significant survival benefit from adjuvant hormone therapy after chemotherapy observed in older patients (hazard ratio for OS, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.79; P = .001) could not be seen in younger patients (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Younger patients (age < 35) showed worse prognosis than older patients (age, 35 to 50 years) only in the hormone receptor-unknown or hormone receptor-positive subgroups. Adjuvant tamoxifen therapy might provide less survival benefit when added to chemotherapy in very young breast cancerpatients.
Authors: Ann H Partridge; Melissa E Hughes; Rebecca A Ottesen; Yu-Ning Wong; Stephen B Edge; Richard L Theriault; Douglas W Blayney; Joyce C Niland; Eric P Winer; Jane C Weeks; Rulla M Tamimi Journal: Oncologist Date: 2012-05-03
Authors: Laura C Collins; Shari Gelber; Jonathan D Marotti; Sarah White; Kathryn Ruddy; Elena F Brachtel; Lidia Schapira; Steven E Come; Virginia F Borges; Pepper Schedin; Ellen Warner; Taylor Wensley; Rulla M Tamimi; Eric P Winer; Ann H Partridge Journal: Oncologist Date: 2015-05-29
Authors: D Ribnikar; J M Ribeiro; D Pinto; B Sousa; A C Pinto; E Gomes; E C Moser; M J Cardoso; F Cardoso Journal: Curr Treat Options Oncol Date: 2015-04
Authors: Julia C Radosa; Anne Eaton; Michelle Stempel; Amrin Khander; Cornelia Liedtke; Erich-Franz Solomayer; Maria Karsten; Melissa Pilewskie; Monica Morrow; Tari A King Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2016-10-25 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Lilla Madaras; Zsuzsanna Baranyák; Janina Kulka; Attila Marcell Szász; Attila Kovács; Phan Huong Lan; Borbála Székely; Magdolna Dank; Tibor Nagy; Orsolya Kiss; László Harsányi; Tamás Barbai; István Kenessey; Anna Mária Tőkés Journal: Pathol Oncol Res Date: 2013-05-26 Impact factor: 3.201
Authors: Hanna Fredholm; Sonja Eaker; Jan Frisell; Lars Holmberg; Irma Fredriksson; Henrik Lindman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-11-11 Impact factor: 3.240