Literature DB >> 23709114

Retrospective analysis of clinicopathological characteristics and family history data of early-onset breast cancer: a single-institutional study of Hungarian patients.

Lilla Madaras1, Zsuzsanna Baranyák, Janina Kulka, Attila Marcell Szász, Attila Kovács, Phan Huong Lan, Borbála Székely, Magdolna Dank, Tibor Nagy, Orsolya Kiss, László Harsányi, Tamás Barbai, István Kenessey, Anna Mária Tőkés.   

Abstract

Patients at young age (≤ 35 years) diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) are considered to have poor prognosis. The aim of the present study was to retrospectively analyse clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis in a group of young BC patients. We included women diagnosed with invasive breast carcinoma younger than/or at the age of 35 years. Between 1999 and 2009, 107 women with early-onset BC were selected from the database of the 2nd Department of Pathology at Semmelweis University. For clinicopathological comparison, 55 women (36-45 years), 214 women (46-65 years), 110 women (66-75 years) and 58 women (76 ≤ years) were also included in the analysis. Family history, clinicopathological and follow-up data were analysed. The tissue specimens were reviewed for histological type, nuclear grade, and estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), Ki67 and HER2 status (IHC4). The mean age in the study group was 31.6 years at the time of diagnosis. Histology showed a high incidence of grade III tumours in this group of patients (67.9 %), while only four cases (3.8 %) were considered grade I. According to the immunohistochemical results, 35.3 % of the study cases were considered as Luminal B (LumB: either being higly proliferative or co-expressing HER2) and 33.3 % as triple negative breast carcinomas (TNBC). The detailed questionnaire related to family history was completed and received in 49/107 cases (45.8 %). Analysis of these data revealed an affected family history of breast or ovarian carcinoma in first and second degree relatives in 51.0 %. A high proportion (52.0 %) of TNBC was observed among young women with a family history of the disease. Survival analysis of the 107 patients showed that 25 (23.3 %) women died until 31 December 2012. No significant difference in survival was detectable considering the regimen of systemic treatment (p = 0.188). Regarding clinicopathological parameters, the immunophenotypes, grade, pT and pN values differred substantially between the age groups (p = 0.001, for all), and the shortest relapse-free survival was seen among the youngest BC patients. This analysis illustrates that breast cancer arising in young women is characterized by the presence of less favorable subtypes such as LumB and TNBC. The increased proportion of TNBC was especially remarquable in the group of patients presenting with family history of the disease. The fact that a high rate of death occurred and no significant difference in OS were notable regarding the scheme of systemic therapies (neoadjuvant vs. adjuvant) highlight the necessity of the development of new treatment strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23709114     DOI: 10.1007/s12253-013-9635-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res        ISSN: 1219-4956            Impact factor:   3.201


  31 in total

1.  Age at onset as an indicator of familial risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  E B Claus; N J Risch; W D Thompson
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Risk factors by molecular subtypes of breast cancer across a population-based study of women 56 years or younger.

Authors:  Mia M Gaudet; Michael F Press; Robert W Haile; Charles F Lynch; Sally L Glaser; Joellen Schildkraut; Marilie D Gammon; W Douglas Thompson; Jonine L Bernstein
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  [Local relapse in young (< or = 40 years) women with breast cancer after mastectomy or breast conserving surgery: 15-year results].

Authors:  János Fodor; Emoke Mózsa; Zoltán Zaka; Csaba Polgár; Tibor Major
Journal:  Magy Onkol       Date:  2005-10-25

4.  Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium.

Authors:  D Ford; D F Easton; M Stratton; S Narod; D Goldgar; P Devilee; D T Bishop; B Weber; G Lenoir; J Chang-Claude; H Sobol; M D Teare; J Struewing; A Arason; S Scherneck; J Peto; T R Rebbeck; P Tonin; S Neuhausen; R Barkardottir; J Eyfjord; H Lynch; B A Ponder; S A Gayther; M Zelada-Hedman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 5.  Is chemotherapy alone adequate for young women with oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer?

Authors:  S Aebi; S Gelber; M Castiglione-Gertsch; R D Gelber; J Collins; B Thürlimann; C M Rudenstam; J Lindtner; D Crivellari; H Cortes-Funes; E Simoncini; I D Werner; A S Coates; A Goldhirsch
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-05-27       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Relationship of patient age to pathologic features of the tumor and prognosis for patients with stage I or II breast cancer.

Authors:  A J Nixon; D Neuberg; D F Hayes; R Gelman; J L Connolly; S Schnitt; A Abner; A Recht; F Vicini; J R Harris
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Young age at diagnosis correlates with worse prognosis and defines a subset of breast cancers with shared patterns of gene expression.

Authors:  Carey K Anders; David S Hsu; Gloria Broadwater; Chaitanya R Acharya; John A Foekens; Yi Zhang; Yixin Wang; P Kelly Marcom; Jeffrey R Marks; Phillip G Febbo; Joseph R Nevins; Anil Potti; Kimberly L Blackwell
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Predicting the likelihood of carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation: validation of BOADICEA, BRCAPRO, IBIS, Myriad and the Manchester scoring system using data from UK genetics clinics.

Authors:  A C Antoniou; R Hardy; L Walker; D G Evans; A Shenton; R Eeles; S Shanley; G Pichert; L Izatt; S Rose; F Douglas; D Eccles; P J Morrison; J Scott; R L Zimmern; D F Easton; P D P Pharoah
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 6.318

9.  Younger age as a prognostic indicator in breast cancer: a cohort study.

Authors:  Elrasheid H A Kheirelseid; Jennifer M E Boggs; Catherine Curran; Ronan W Glynn; Cara Dooley; Karl J Sweeney; Michael J Kerin
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 10.  Breast cancer in young women and its impact on reproductive function.

Authors:  M Hickey; M Peate; C M Saunders; M Friedlander
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 15.610

View more
  2 in total

1.  Clinical pathologies of breast cancer in the elderly and youths and their prognosis.

Authors:  Hong Ji; Ning Ai; Qinghuai Li; Kaili Zhang; Wang Di
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.088

2.  MicroRNAs discriminate familial from sporadic non-BRCA1/2 breast carcinoma arising in patients ≤35 years.

Authors:  Elen Pereira Bastos; Helena Brentani; Fatima Solange Pasini; Aderbal Ruy T Silva; Cesar Henrique Torres; Renato David Puga; Eloisa Helena Ribeiro Olivieri; Amanda Rusiska Piovezani; Carlos Alberto de Bragança Pereira; Ariane Machado-Lima; Dirce Maria Carraro; Maria Mitzi Brentani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.