Literature DB >> 11486785

How reliable is the ultrasound densitometer for community screening to diagnose osteoporosis in spine, femur, and forearm?

K I Kim1, I K Han, H Kim, N H Cho.   

Abstract

Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the most widely used noninvasive, quantitative diagnostic method of measuring bone density, but it exhibits several limitations for the purpose of general screening and community-based study. Thus, we evaluated the feasibility of the ultrasound densitometer SoundScan Compact for screening the osteoporosis community. We compared the reliability of the SoundScan Compact's measurement to predict both osteopenia and osteoporosis at the spine, femur, and forearm measured by the XR-36. World Health Organisation criteria and Korean reference were used for the diagnosis of osteopenia and osteoporosis. Of the 1827 subjects screened in the community, we randomly selected and invited 106 subjects to our university hospital center for clinical epidemiology for further evaluation of their bone health using DXA. The site-specific relationships among speed of sound and bone mineral density at L2-L4 spine, femoral neck, trochanter, Ward's triangle, distal radius + ulna, proximal radius + ulna, and proximal radius were highly correlated with r values of 0.633, 0.632, 0.674, 0.632, 0.668, 0.78, and 0.777 respectively (all p < 0.0001). Of the 42 subjects defined as normal in the spine by SoundScan Compact's, 27 (64.3%) were also in agreement as the normal by the XR-36. However, an agreement of 43.5% (10/23) in osteopenia and 53.7% (22/41) in osteoporosis was less sensitive. Reliability tested by kappa statistics (kappa = 0.35; t = 5.3; p < 0.0001) revealed that the degree of agreement was not coincidental. On the femur, 54.8% (23/42) agreed as normal, 73.9% (17/23) as osteopenia, and 39% (16/41) as osteoporosis (kappa = 0.33; t = 5.5; p < 0.0001). Higher reliability was found in the forearm, with a kappa value of 0.48, t = 7.2, and p < 0.0001. A magnitude of agreement was also greater in the forearm, with 83.3% (35/42) agreement in normal, 52.2% (12/23) in osteopenia, and 64% (16/25) in osteoporosis. Although the SoundScan Compact's measures different bone properties and measurements are taken at different sites, it is a very useful instrument with a high correlation and high degree of variation and reliability to predict bone health at other sites such as the spine, femur, and forearm. The ultrasound densitometer such as SoundScan Compact's merits its use for community screening and in the primary care setting to detect osteopenia and osteoporosis for the purpose of early detection and prevention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11486785     DOI: 10.1385/jcd:4:2:159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.963


  2 in total

1.  Comparisons of bone mass measurements on various skeletal sites including quantitative ultrasonography of the calcaneus for assessing age-related losses, their correlations, and diagnostic agreement using the Japanese and WHO criteria for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Yasushi Imashuku; Masahiko Takada; Kiyoshi Murata
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2007-05-28

2.  Can the WHO definition of osteoporosis be applied to multi-site axial transmission quantitative ultrasound?

Authors:  K M Knapp; G M Blake; T D Spector; I Fogelman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 4.507

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.