Literature DB >> 17514169

Current trends in total hip arthroplasty.

Christoph Eingartner1.   

Abstract

After 20 years of application, with excellent short-term and long-term results, uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) is now generally regarded as the standard procedure for younger patients undergoing THA. However, expectations regarding hip replacement are continuously rising, along with the increasing number of young and active patients undergoing hip arthroplasty: a complication rate, including postoperative dislocation, close to zero, faster postoperative rehabilitation, low wear even in active patients, high durability and long term survival, etc. Demographic changes in aging societies are also leading to an increased need for cost-effective THA for the low-demand trauma patient. For high-demand patients, modern THA bearings, such as ceramic-ceramic articulations and other improved PE and metal materials, provide high durability and low wear, if the components are properly aligned. Navigation technology has been introduced in THA to ensure perfect component positioning without outliers and concomitant risk of increased wear and implant failure. Minimally and less invasive approaches are becoming increasingly popular in order to facilitate rehabilitation and fast-track surgery in younger patients. Navigation provides assistance for implant positioning in procedures with limited surgical exposure and visibility. New bone-preserving implants, such as surface replacement or short-stemmed femoral shaft prostheses, have been introduced especially for younger patients. Some of these new procedures are still under development,and the long-term results of new implant concepts have to be evaluated over the next decades. Not every modern concept will likely stand the test of time, but some will be beneficial for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17514169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ortop Traumatol Rehabil        ISSN: 1509-3492


  12 in total

1.  Periprosthetic fractures may be more likely in cementless femoral stems with sharp edges.

Authors:  K Hu; X Zhang; J Zhu; C Wang; W Ji; X Bai
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Modular cementless cup for total hip arthroplasty: results at 4-year follow-up.

Authors:  Alessandro Bistolfi; Giuseppe Massazza; Federica Rosso; Stefano Ventura; Francesco Lagalla; Maurizio Crova
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2012-01-06

3.  A custom-made guide-wire positioning device for hip surface replacement arthroplasty: description and first results.

Authors:  Martijn Raaijmaakers; Frederik Gelaude; Karla De Smedt; Tim Clijmans; Jeroen Dille; Michiel Mulier
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Risk of complication and revision total hip arthroplasty among Medicare patients with different bearing surfaces.

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Kevin Ong; Edmund Lau; Steven M Kurtz; Thomas P Vail; Harry E Rubash; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Current and future regenerative medicine - principles, concepts, and therapeutic use of stem cell therapy and tissue engineering in equine medicine.

Authors:  Thomas G Koch; Lise C Berg; Dean H Betts
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.008

6.  Use of a Digital Protractor and a Spirit Level to Determine the Intraoperative Anteversion of Femoral Component during Cemented Hip Hemiarthroplasty: a Prospective Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Anuwat Pongkunakorn; Patanapong Palawong; Swist Chatmaitri; Nawakun Phetpangnga
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2019-07

7.  Better early functional outcome after short stem total hip arthroplasty? A prospective blinded randomised controlled multicentre trial comparing the Collum Femoris Preserving stem with a Zweymuller straight cementless stem total hip replacement for the treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  Jakob van Oldenrijk; Vanessa A B Scholtes; Loes W A H van Beers; Carel H Geerdink; Bob B A M Niers; Wouter Runne; Mohit Bhandari; Rudolf W Poolman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  No association between preoperative physical activity level and time to return to work in patients after total hip or knee arthroplasty: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Anton R Boersma; Sandra Brouwer; Wendy Koolhaas; Reinoud W Brouwer; Wierd P Zijlstra; Jan van Beveren; Martin Stevens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Navigated cup implantation in hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Johannes Beckmann; Dirk Stengel; Markus Tingart; Jürgen Götz; Joachim Grifka; Christian Lüring
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Maintenance of bone mineral density after implantation of a femoral neck hip prosthesis.

Authors:  Ralf Decking; Christoph Rokahr; Matthias Zurstegge; Ulrich Simon; Jens Decking
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.