Eleftherios P Mamounas1, Hanna Bandos2, Barry C Lembersky3, Jong-Hyeon Jeong2, Charles E Geyer4, Priya Rastogi3, Louis Fehrenbacher5, Mark L Graham6, Stephen K Chia7, Adam M Brufsky3, Janice M Walshe8, Gamini S Soori9, Shaker R Dakhil10, Thomas E Seay11, James L Wade12, Edward C McCarron13, Soonmyung Paik14, Sandra M Swain15, D Lawrence Wickerham16, Norman Wolmark16. 1. NRG Oncology/NSABP, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; UF Health Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL, USA. Electronic address: terry.mamounas@orlandohealth.com. 2. NRG Oncology/NSABP, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 3. NRG Oncology/NSABP, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; The University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 4. NRG Oncology/NSABP, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA. 5. NRG Oncology/NSABP, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Kaiser Permanente Oncology Clinical Trials Northern California, Vallejo, CA, USA. 6. NRG Oncology/NSABP, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Southeast Cancer Control Consortium, Goldsboro, NC, USA. 7. NRG Oncology/NSABP, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 8. NRG Oncology/NSABP, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Cancer Trials Ireland (formerly known as Irish Clinical Oncology Research Group-ICORG), Dublin, Ireland. 9. NRG Oncology/NSABP, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Cancer Alliance of Nebraska(Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium), Omaha, NE, USA. 10. NRG Oncology/NSABP, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; CCCOP, Wichita Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS, USA. 11. NRG Oncology/NSABP, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Georgia NCI Community Oncology Research Program, Atlanta, GA, USA. 12. NRG Oncology/NSABP, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; CCOP, Central Illinois, Decatur, IL, USA. 13. NRG Oncology/NSABP, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; MedStar Franklin Square Medical Center/Weinberg Cancer Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA. 14. NRG Oncology/NSABP, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. 15. NRG Oncology/NSABP, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA. 16. NRG Oncology/NSABP, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The optimal duration of extended therapy with aromatase inhibitors in patients with postmenopausal breast cancer is unknown. In the NSABP B-42 study, we aimed to determine whether extended letrozole treatment improves disease-free survival after 5 years of aromatase inhibitor-based therapy in women with postmenopausal breast cancer. METHODS: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial was done in 158 centres in the USA, Canada, and Ireland. Postmenopausal women with stage I-IIIA hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, who were disease-free after about 5 years of treatment with an aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen followed by an aromatase inhibitor, were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 5 years of letrozole (2·5 mg orally per day) or placebo. Randomisation was stratified by pathological node status, previous tamoxifen use, and lowest bone mineral density T score in the lumbosacral spine, total hip, or femoral neck. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival, defined as time from randomisation to breast cancer recurrence, second primary malignancy, or death, and was analysed by intention to treat. To adjust for previous interim analyses, the two-sided statistical significance level for disease-free survival was set at 0·0418. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00382070, is active, and is no longer enrolling patients. FINDINGS:Between Sept 28, 2006, and Jan 6, 2010, 3966 patients were randomly assigned to receive letrozole (n=1983) or placebo (n=1983). Follow-up information was available for 3903 patients for the analyses of disease-free survival. Median follow-up was 6·9 years (IQR 6·1-7·5). Letrozole treatment did not significantly improve disease-free survival (339 disease-free survival events were reported in the placebo group and 292 disease-free survival events were reported in the letrozole group; hazard ratio 0·85, 95% CI 0·73-0·999; p=0·048). 7-year disease-free survival estimate was 81·3% (95% CI 79·3-83·1) in the placebo group and 84·7% (82·9-86·4) in the letrozole group. The most common grade 3 adverse events were arthralgia (47 [2%] of 1933 patients in the placebo group vs 50 [3%] of 1941 patients in the letrozole group) and back pain (44 [2%] vs 38 [2%]). The most common grade 4 adverse event in the placebo group was thromboembolic event (eight [<1%]) and the most common grade 4 adverse events in the letrozole group were urinary tract infection, hypokalaemia, and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (four [<1%] each). INTERPRETATION: After 5 years of aromatase inhibitor-based therapy, 5 years of letrozole therapy did not significantly prolong disease-free survival compared with placebo. Careful assessment of potential risks and benefits is required before recommending extended letrozole therapy to patients with early-stage breast cancer. FUNDING: National Cancer Institute, Korea Health Technology R&D Project, Novartis.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The optimal duration of extended therapy with aromatase inhibitors in patients with postmenopausal breast cancer is unknown. In the NSABP B-42 study, we aimed to determine whether extended letrozole treatment improves disease-free survival after 5 years ofaromatase inhibitor-based therapy in women with postmenopausal breast cancer. METHODS: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial was done in 158 centres in the USA, Canada, and Ireland. Postmenopausal women with stage I-IIIA hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, who were disease-free after about 5 years of treatment with an aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen followed by an aromatase inhibitor, were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 5 years ofletrozole (2·5 mg orally per day) or placebo. Randomisation was stratified by pathological node status, previous tamoxifen use, and lowest bone mineral density T score in the lumbosacral spine, total hip, or femoral neck. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival, defined as time from randomisation to breast cancer recurrence, second primary malignancy, or death, and was analysed by intention to treat. To adjust for previous interim analyses, the two-sided statistical significance level for disease-free survival was set at 0·0418. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00382070, is active, and is no longer enrolling patients. FINDINGS: Between Sept 28, 2006, and Jan 6, 2010, 3966 patients were randomly assigned to receive letrozole (n=1983) or placebo (n=1983). Follow-up information was available for 3903 patients for the analyses of disease-free survival. Median follow-up was 6·9 years (IQR 6·1-7·5). Letrozole treatment did not significantly improve disease-free survival (339 disease-free survival events were reported in the placebo group and 292 disease-free survival events were reported in the letrozole group; hazard ratio 0·85, 95% CI 0·73-0·999; p=0·048). 7-year disease-free survival estimate was 81·3% (95% CI 79·3-83·1) in the placebo group and 84·7% (82·9-86·4) in the letrozole group. The most common grade 3 adverse events were arthralgia (47 [2%] of 1933 patients in the placebo group vs 50 [3%] of 1941 patients in the letrozole group) and back pain (44 [2%] vs 38 [2%]). The most common grade 4 adverse event in the placebo group was thromboembolic event (eight [<1%]) and the most common grade 4 adverse events in the letrozole group were urinary tract infection, hypokalaemia, and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (four [<1%] each). INTERPRETATION: After 5 years ofaromatase inhibitor-based therapy, 5 years ofletrozole therapy did not significantly prolong disease-free survival compared with placebo. Careful assessment of potential risks and benefits is required before recommending extended letrozole therapy to patients with early-stage breast cancer. FUNDING: National Cancer Institute, Korea Health Technology R&D Project, Novartis.
Authors: Martin Filipits; Torsten O Nielsen; Margaretha Rudas; Richard Greil; Herbert Stöger; Raimund Jakesz; Zsuzsanna Bago-Horvath; Otto Dietze; Peter Regitnig; Christine Gruber-Rossipal; Elisabeth Müller-Holzner; Christian F Singer; Brigitte Mlineritsch; Peter Dubsky; Thomas Bauernhofer; Michael Hubalek; Michael Knauer; Harald Trapl; Christian Fesl; Carl Schaper; Sean Ferree; Shuzhen Liu; J Wayne Cowens; Michael Gnant Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-02-11 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Paul E Goss; James N Ingle; Silvana Martino; Nicholas J Robert; Hyman B Muss; Martine J Piccart; Monica Castiglione; Dongsheng Tu; Lois E Shepherd; Kathleen I Pritchard; Robert B Livingston; Nancy E Davidson; Larry Norton; Edith A Perez; Jeffrey S Abrams; Patrick Therasse; Michael J Palmer; Joseph L Pater Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-10-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Eleftherios P Mamounas; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; D Lawrence Wickerham; Roy E Smith; Patricia A Ganz; Stephanie R Land; Andrea Eisen; Louis Fehrenbacher; William B Farrar; James N Atkins; Eduardo R Pajon; Victor G Vogel; Joan F Kroener; Laura F Hutchins; André Robidoux; James L Hoehn; James N Ingle; Charles E Geyer; Joseph P Costantino; Norman Wolmark Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-03-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Clifford A Hudis; William E Barlow; Joseph P Costantino; Robert J Gray; Kathleen I Pritchard; Judith-Anne W Chapman; Joseph A Sparano; Sally Hunsberger; Rebecca A Enos; Richard D Gelber; Jo Anne Zujewski Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-05-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: P Dubsky; J C Brase; R Jakesz; M Rudas; C F Singer; R Greil; O Dietze; I Luisser; E Klug; R Sedivy; M Bachner; D Mayr; M Schmidt; M C Gehrmann; C Petry; K E Weber; K Fisch; R Kronenwett; M Gnant; M Filipits Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2013-10-24 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Dennis C Sgroi; Ivana Sestak; Jack Cuzick; Yi Zhang; Catherine A Schnabel; Brock Schroeder; Mark G Erlander; Anita Dunbier; Kally Sidhu; Elena Lopez-Knowles; Paul E Goss; Mitch Dowsett Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2013-09-12 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Christina Davies; Hongchao Pan; Jon Godwin; Richard Gray; Rodrigo Arriagada; Vinod Raina; Mirta Abraham; Victor Hugo Medeiros Alencar; Atef Badran; Xavier Bonfill; Joan Bradbury; Michael Clarke; Rory Collins; Susan R Davis; Antonella Delmestri; John F Forbes; Peiman Haddad; Ming-Feng Hou; Moshe Inbar; Hussein Khaled; Joanna Kielanowska; Wing-Hong Kwan; Beela S Mathew; Indraneel Mittra; Bettina Müller; Antonio Nicolucci; Octavio Peralta; Fany Pernas; Lubos Petruzelka; Tadeusz Pienkowski; Ramachandran Radhika; Balakrishnan Rajan; Maryna T Rubach; Sera Tort; Gerard Urrútia; Miriam Valentini; Yaochen Wang; Richard Peto Journal: Lancet Date: 2013-03-09 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Dennis C Sgroi; Erin Carney; Elizabeth Zarrella; Lauren Steffel; Shemeica N Binns; Dianne M Finkelstein; Jackie Szymonifka; Atul K Bhan; Lois E Shepherd; Yi Zhang; Catherine A Schnabel; Mark G Erlander; James N Ingle; Peggy Porter; Hyman B Muss; Katherine I Pritchard; Dongsheng Tu; David L Rimm; Paul E Goss Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2013-06-28 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Kimberley T Lee; Lisa Jacobs; Elaine M Walsh; Vered Stearns; Jodi B Segal Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2020-09-10 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Irene E G van Hellemond; Carolien H Smorenburg; Petronella G M Peer; Astrid C P Swinkels; Caroline M Seynaeve; Maurice J C van der Sangen; Judith R Kroep; Hiltje de Graaf; Aafke H Honkoop; Frans L G Erdkamp; Franchette W P J van den Berkmortel; Maaike de Boer; Wilfred K de Roos; Sabine C Linn; Alexander L T Imholz; Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2019-03-04 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Joel W Neal; Daniel B Costa; Alona Muzikansky; Joseph B Shrager; Michael Lanuti; James Huang; Kavitha J Ramachandran; Deepa Rangachari; Mark S Huberman; Zofia Piotrowska; Mark G Kris; Christopher G Azzoli; Lecia V Sequist; Jamie E Chaft Journal: JCO Precis Oncol Date: 2021-02-01