Literature DB >> 18999192

The impact of web-based diabetes risk calculators on information processing and risk perceptions.

Christopher Harle1, Rema Padman, Julie Downs.   

Abstract

As consumer demand for online health information grows, many organizations are providing personalized and interactive health risk communication tools. In response, there is a need to better understand how effective these features are in influencing user attention, information processing and risk perceptions. This study randomly assigned 100 middle-aged and elderly adult users to one of three versions of an experimental type 2 diabetes "risk calculator" in order to determine if personalized risk estimates and interactive risk feedback impact usage behavior and beliefs about future diabetes onset. Results suggest that personalization and interactive features did not lead to increases in user attention or systematic information processing. The experiment provided only modest evidence that personalization was related to increased accuracy in absolute diabetes risk perceptions. Future studies are warranted to more precisely explain the descriptive and normative implications when laypersons use web-based risk communication tools.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18999192      PMCID: PMC2656037     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  6 in total

1.  Testing and expanding a model of cognitive processing of risk information.

Authors:  Branden B Johnson
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  Progression from newly acquired impaired fasting glusose to type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Gregory A Nichols; Teresa A Hillier; Jonathan B Brown
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Understanding how people process health information: a comparison of tailored and nontailored weight-loss materials.

Authors:  M W Kreuter; F C Bull; E M Clark; D L Oswald
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.267

4.  Risk perception for developing diabetes: comparative risk judgments of physicians.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Walker; C K Mertz; Maria R Kalten; James Flynn
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Colon cancer: risk perceptions and risk communication.

Authors:  Neil D Weinstein; Kathy Atwood; Elaine Puleo; Robert Fletcher; Graham Colditz; Karen M Emmons
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb

Review 6.  Cancer risk elicitation and communication: lessons from the psychology of risk perception.

Authors:  William M P Klein; Michael E Stefanek
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 508.702

  6 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Communicating genetic risk information for common disorders in the era of genomic medicine.

Authors:  Denise M Lautenbach; Kurt D Christensen; Jeffrey A Sparks; Robert C Green
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 8.929

2.  Perils of providing visual health information overviews for consumers with low health literacy or high stress.

Authors:  Gondy Leroy; Trudi Miller
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Use of topic modeling for recommending relevant education material to diabetic patients.

Authors:  Sasikiran Kandula; Dorothy Curtis; Brent Hill; Qing Zeng-Treitler
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

4.  Comparing clinical judgment with the MySurgeryRisk algorithm for preoperative risk assessment: A pilot usability study.

Authors:  Meghan Brennan; Sahil Puri; Tezcan Ozrazgat-Baslanti; Zheng Feng; Matthew Ruppert; Haleh Hashemighouchani; Petar Momcilovic; Xiaolin Li; Daisy Zhe Wang; Azra Bihorac
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Mismatch between self-perceived and calculated cardiometabolic disease risk among participants in a prevention program for cardiometabolic disease: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  D M Stol; M Hollander; O C Damman; M M J Nielen; I F Badenbroek; F G Schellevis; N J de Wit
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.295

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.