Literature DB >> 17503509

Comparison of in vivo acute stent recoil between the bioabsorbable everolimus-eluting coronary stent and the everolimus-eluting cobalt chromium coronary stent: insights from the ABSORB and SPIRIT trials.

Shuzou Tanimoto1, Patrick W Serruys, Leif Thuesen, Dariusz Dudek, Bernard de Bruyne, Bernard Chevalier, John A Ormiston.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate and compare in vivo acute stent recoil of a novel bioabsorbable stent and a metallic stent.
BACKGROUND: The bioabsorbable everolimus-eluting coronary stent (BVS) is composed of a poly-L-lactic acid backbone, coated with a bioabsorbable polymer containing the antiproliferative drug, everolimus, and expected to be totally metabolized and absorbed in the human body. Because the BVS is made from polymer, it may have more acute recoil than metallic stents in vivo.
METHODS: A total of 54 patients, who underwent elective stent implantation for single de novo native coronary artery lesions, were enrolled: 27 patients treated with the BVS and 27 patients treated with the everolimus-eluting cobalt chromium stent (EES). Acute absolute recoil, assessed by quantitative coronary angiography, was defined as the difference between mean diameter of the last inflated balloon at the highest pressure (X) and mean lumen diameter of the stent immediately after the last balloon deflation (Y). Acute percent recoil was defined as (X - Y)/X and expressed as a percentage.
RESULTS: Acute absolute recoil of the BVS and EES was 0.20 +/- 0.21 mm and 0.13 +/- 0.21 mm, respectively (P = 0.32). Acute percent recoil was 6.9% +/- 7.0% in the BVS group and 4.3% +/- 7.1% in the EES group (P = 0.25).
CONCLUSIONS: In vivo acute stent recoil of the BVS is slightly larger but insignificantly different from that of the EES, implying that the BVS may have good radial strength similar to the metallic stent. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17503509     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.21136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  27 in total

Review 1.  Restenosis after PCI. Part 2: prevention and therapy.

Authors:  J Wouter Jukema; Tarek A N Ahmed; Jeffrey J W Verschuren; Paul H A Quax
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 2.  Emerging Technologies in Flow Diverters and Stents for Cerebrovascular Diseases.

Authors:  Michael Karsy; Jian Guan; Andrea A Brock; Anubhav Amin; Min S Park
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 5.081

3.  Preventable effects of bare-metal stent on restenosis after everolimus-eluting stent deployment.

Authors:  Akihiro Shirakabe; Masamichi Takano; Masanori Yamamoto; Osamu Kurihara; Nobuaki Kobayashi; Masato Matsushita; Masafumi Tsurumi; Hirotake Okazaki; Noritake Hata; Wataru Shimizu
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  A head to head comparison of XINSORB bioresorbable sirolimus-eluting scaffold versus metallic sirolimus-eluting stent: 180 days follow-up in a porcine model.

Authors:  Li Shen; Yizhe Wu; Lei Ge; Yaojun Zhang; Qibing Wang; Juying Qian; Zhifen Qiu; Junbo Ge
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 5.  Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Current Evidences in the Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Bhargav Dave
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-10-01

Review 6.  A review of bioresorbable scaffolds: hype or hope?

Authors:  Huay Cheem Tan; Rajiv Ananthakrishna
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 1.858

7.  Predictors of acute scaffold recoil after implantation of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold: an optical coherence tomography assessment in native coronary arteries.

Authors:  Takao Sato; John Jose; Mohamed El-Mawardy; Dmitriy S Sulimov; Ralph Tölg; Gert Richardt; Mohamed Abdel-Wahab
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  In vivo assessment of stent recoil of biodegradable polymer-coated cobalt-chromium sirolimus-eluting coronary stent system.

Authors:  Atul D Abhyankar; Ashok S Thakkar
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2012-07-27

Review 9.  Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds - basic concepts and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Ciro Indolfi; Salvatore De Rosa; Antonio Colombo
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 32.419

10.  Successful technical and clinical outcome using a second generation balloon expandable coronary stent for transplant renal artery stenosis: Our experience.

Authors:  Jason Salsamendi; Keith Pereira; Reginald Baker; Shivank S Bhatia; Govindarajan Narayanan
Journal:  J Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2015-10-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.