Literature DB >> 23615976

Simultaneous action execution and observation optimise grasping actions.

Mathilde Ménoret1, Aurore Curie, Vincent des Portes, Tatjana A Nazir, Yves Paulignan.   

Abstract

Action observation and execution share overlapping neural resonating mechanisms. In the present study, we sought to examine the effect of the activation of this system during concurrent movement observation and execution in a prehension task, when no a priori information about the requirements of grasping action was available. Although it is known that simultaneous activation by observation and execution influences motor performance, the importance of the delays of these two events and the specific effect of movement observation itself (and not the prediction of the to-be-observed movement) on action performance are poorly known. Fine-grained kinematic analysis of both the transport and grasp components of the movement should provide knowledge about the influence of movement observation on the precision and the performance of the executed movement. The experiment involved two real participants who were asked to grasp a different side of a single object that was composed of a large and a small part. In the first experiment, we measured how the transport component and the grasp component were affected by movement observation. We tested whether this influence was greater if the observed movement occurred just before the onset of movement (200 ms) or well before the onset of movement (1 s). In a second experiment, to reproduce the previous experiment and to verify the specificity of the grasping movements, we also included a condition consisting of pointing towards the object. Both experiments showed two main results. A general facilitation of the transport component was found when observing a simultaneous action, independent of its congruency. Moreover, a specific facilitation of the grasp component was present during the observation of a congruent action when movement execution and observation were nearly synchronised. While the general facilitation may arise from a competition between the two participants as they reached for the object, the specific facilitation of the grasp component seems to be directly related to mirror neuron system activity induced by action observation itself. Moreover, the time course of the events appears to be an essential factor for this modulation, implying the transitory activation of the mirror neuron system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23615976     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3523-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  31 in total

1.  Motor facilitation while observing hand actions: specificity of the effect and role of observer's orientation.

Authors:  Fumiko Maeda; Galit Kleiner-Fisman; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Motor facilitation following action observation: a behavioural study in prehensile action.

Authors:  Martin G Edwards; Glyn W Humphreys; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Joint control strategies and hand trajectories in multijoint pointing movements.

Authors:  T Kaminski; A M Gentile
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study.

Authors:  G Buccino; F Binkofski; G R Fink; L Fadiga; L Fogassi; V Gallese; R J Seitz; K Zilles; G Rizzolatti; H J Freund
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 5.  The role of motor contagion in the prediction of action.

Authors:  Sarah-Jayne Blakemore; Chris Frith
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005-01-07       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Effects of visual uncertainty on grasping movements.

Authors:  Erik J Schlicht; Paul R Schrater
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Moving just like you: motor interference depends on similar motility of agent and observer.

Authors:  Aleksandra Kupferberg; Markus Huber; Bartosz Helfer; Claus Lenz; Alois Knoll; Stefan Glasauer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Relationship between activity in human primary motor cortex during action observation and the mirror neuron system.

Authors:  James M Kilner; Jennifer L Marchant; Chris D Frith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Effects of agency on movement interference during observation of a moving dot stimulus.

Authors:  James Stanley; Emma Gowen; R Chris Miall
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Sensorimotor cortex as a critical component of an 'extended' mirror neuron system: Does it solve the development, correspondence, and control problems in mirroring?

Authors:  Jaime A Pineda
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 3.759

View more
  9 in total

1.  Visuo-motor interference with a virtual partner is equally present in cooperative and competitive interactions.

Authors:  Vanessa Era; Salvatore Maria Aglioti; Carolina Mancusi; Matteo Candidi
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-09-06

2.  Coordination deficits during trunk-assisted reach-to-grasp movements in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Miya K Rand; Arend W A Van Gemmert; Abul B M I Hossain; George E Stelmach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Motor interference in interactive contexts.

Authors:  Eris Chinellato; Umberto Castiello; Luisa Sartori
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-11

4.  Motor resonance facilitates movement execution: an ERP and kinematic study.

Authors:  Mathilde Ménoret; Aurore Curie; Vincent des Portes; Tatjana A Nazir; Yves Paulignan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Music-supported motor training after stroke reveals no superiority of synchronization in group therapy.

Authors:  Floris T Van Vugt; Juliane Ritter; Jens D Rollnik; Eckart Altenmüller
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Act on Numbers: Numerical Magnitude Influences Selection and Kinematics of Finger Movement.

Authors:  Rosa Rugani; Sonia Betti; Francesco Ceccarini; Luisa Sartori
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-08-30

7.  Timing Training in Female Soccer Players: Effects on Skilled Movement Performance and Brain Responses.

Authors:  Marius Sommer; Charlotte K Häger; Carl Johan Boraxbekk; Louise Rönnqvist
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Changes in spontaneous overt motor execution immediately after observing others' painful action: two pilot studies.

Authors:  Annelies Pool-Goudzwaard; Wim Groeneveld; Michel W Coppieters; Wim Waterink
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Concurrent Imitative Movement During Action Observation Facilitates Accuracy of Outcome Prediction in Less-Skilled Performers.

Authors:  Satoshi Unenaka; Sachi Ikudome; Shiro Mori; Hiroki Nakamoto
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-07-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.