Literature DB >> 17501879

Periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty.

Simon W Young1, Salil Pandit, Jacob T Munro, Rocco P Pitto.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The management of periprosthetic fracture following a total hip arthroplasty is difficult, requiring expertise in both trauma and revision surgery. With rising numbers of patients in the population living with hip prostheses in situ, the frequency of these fractures is increasing, and controversy remains over their ideal management. The objective of this study was to review all periprosthetic fractures at a single institution to identify injury and treatment patterns and their associated clinical outcomes.
METHODS: Fifty-four periprosthetic fractures in 50 patients were reviewed to determine the relative frequency of fracture types, their complication rates and the clinical outcomes. Patient data were obtained through review of the clinical notes and individual patient follow up. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Oxford Hip Score and Harris Hip Score.
RESULTS: The 54 fractures were classified using the Vancouver system, most of which were type B1 (20) or type B2 (10). The mean time to union for all fracture types was 4.6 months. A high non-union rate was seen among fractures fixed operatively. Fifteen per cent of fractures went on to develop loosening following treatment, suggesting an underrecognition at the time of injury. The average Harris Hip Score was 73.1 and Oxford Hip Score 30.3 for all fracture types at a mean follow up of 3.3 years. In the 15 patients treated with revision surgery, the most common complication was dislocation (27%).
CONCLUSION: Treatment of patients with periprosthetic fractures requires recognition of the challenging nature of these injuries, the associated poor prognosis and the high complication rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17501879     DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2007.04087.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  8 in total

Review 1.  Incidence and predisposing factors of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures: a literature review.

Authors:  Claudia C Sidler-Maier; James P Waddell
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Adequate surgical treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures following hip arthroplasty does not correlate with functional outcome and quality of life.

Authors:  Sven Märdian; Klaus-Dieter Schaser; Johanna Gruner; Franziska Scheel; Carsten Perka; Philipp Schwabe
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Bicortical screw fixation provides superior biomechanical stability but devastating failure modes in periprosthetic femur fracture care using locking plates.

Authors:  Clemens Gwinner; Sven Märdian; Tobias Dröge; Martin Schulze; Michael J Raschke; Richard Stange
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Could Patient Undergwent Surgical Treatment for Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture after Hip Arthroplasty Return to Their Status before Trauma?

Authors:  Long Zheng; Woo-Yong Lee; Deuk-Soo Hwang; Chan Kang; Chang-Kyun Noh
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2016-06-30

Review 5.  Periprosthetic fractures around the femoral stem: overcoming challenges and avoiding pitfalls.

Authors:  Andrew N Fleischman; Antonia F Chen
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-09

6.  Combined Surgical and Medical Treatment for Vancouver B1 and C Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: A Proposal of a Therapeutic Algorithm While Retaining the Original Stable Stem.

Authors:  Nicola Mondanelli; Elisa Troiano; Andrea Facchini; Martina Cesari; Giovanni Battista Colasanti; Vanna Bottai; Francesco Muratori; Carla Caffarelli; Stefano Gonnelli; Stefano Giannotti
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2021-12-21

7.  LOQTEQ® VA Periprosthetic Plate-A New Concept for Bicortical Screw Fixation in Periprosthetic Fractures: A Technical Note.

Authors:  Clemens Kösters; Daniel den Toom; Sven Märdian; Steffen Roßlenbroich; Sebastian Metzlaff; Kiriakos Daniilidis; Jens Everding
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Concepts and Potential Future Developments for Treatment of Periprosthetic Proximal Femoral Fractures.

Authors:  Stephan Brand; Max Ettinger; Mohamed Omar; Nael Hawi; Christian Krettek; Maximilian Petri
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2015-08-31
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.