Literature DB >> 17496673

Prevalence of dead regions in subjects with sensorineural hearing loss.

Brian C J Moore.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of dead regions in adult subjects with sensorineural hearing impairment as a function of audiometric threshold and frequency and to assess the extent to which the presence/absence of a dead region can be predicted from the audiogram, gender, or age.
DESIGN: Data were obtained from a random sample of adults attending an audiology clinic in Mysore, India. Audiometric air and bone conduction thresholds and tympanometry were used to identify 317 subjects (592 ears) with sensorineural hearing loss. Their ages ranged from 17 to 95 yr (mean = 57 yr). The threshold-equalizing noise hearing level (TEN (HL)) test, administered using the TEN(HL)-test CD and an audiometer, was used to determine the presence or absence of dead regions in these subjects for test frequencies ranging from 0.5 to 4 kHz. Nine subjects had to be excluded as the absolute thresholds were too high for the TEN(HL) test to be administered. Of the remaining 308 subjects (556 ears), 209 (68%) were male and 99 (32%) were female. The hearing losses ranged from mild to severe.
RESULTS: Results are presented only for frequencies and ears for which the TEN level could be made high enough to produce at least 10 dB of masking. Classifying by subject, 177 (57.4%) were found to have a dead region in one or both ears for at least one frequency. Fifty-four women (54.5%) and 123 men (58.8%) had dead regions in one or both ears. Classifying by ear, 256 (46%) were diagnosed as having a dead region at one frequency or more: 233 ears (41.9%) had only a high-frequency dead region, 13 ears (2.3%) had only a low-frequency dead region, and 10 ears (1.8%) had a dead region at both low and high frequencies, with a surviving middle-frequency region. It was not possible to achieve both high sensitivity and high specificity when attempting to predict the presence/absence of a dead region from the audiogram. However, for each test frequency, 59% or more of ears had a dead region when the absolute threshold was above 70 dB HL. A very steep slope of the audiogram is suggestive of a high-frequency dead region but does not provide a reliable diagnostic method. Chi-square tests indicated that the prevalence of dead regions did not vary significantly with age or gender.
CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate a relatively high prevalence of dead regions in adults with sensorineural hearing impairment, especially for frequencies at which the hearing loss exceeds 70 dB HL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17496673     DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31803126e2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  21 in total

1.  Improving melody recognition in cochlear implant recipients through individualized frequency map fitting.

Authors:  Walter Di Nardo; Alessandro Scorpecci; Sara Giannantonio; Francesca Cianfrone; Gaetano Paludetti
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Using the auditory steady state response to record response amplitude curves. A possible fast objective method for diagnosing dead regions.

Authors:  Timothy Wilding; Colette McKay; Richard Baker; Terence Picton; Karolina Kluk
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 3.  The Physiologic and Psychophysical Consequences of Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Eric Hoover
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-10-26

4.  Processing Complex Sounds Passing through the Rostral Brainstem: The New Early Filter Model.

Authors:  John E Marsh; Tom A Campbell
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 5.  Current audiological diagnostics.

Authors:  Sebastian Hoth; Izet Baljić
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-12-18

6.  Implications of high-frequency cochlear dead regions for fitting hearing aids to adults with mild to moderately severe hearing loss.

Authors:  Robyn M Cox; Jani A Johnson; Genevieve C Alexander
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Factors affecting outcomes on the TEN (SPL) test in adults with hearing loss.

Authors:  Benjamin W Y Hornsby; J Andrew Dundas
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Spectro-temporal characteristics of speech at high frequencies, and the potential for restoration of audibility to people with mild-to-moderate hearing loss.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Michael A Stone; Christian Füllgrabe; Brian R Glasberg; Sunil Puria
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  The effects of frequency lowering on speech perception in noise with adult hearing-aid users.

Authors:  Christi W Miller; Emily Bates; Marc Brennan
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 2.117

10.  Factors constraining the benefit to speech understanding of combining information from low-frequency hearing and a cochlear implant.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Sarah Cook; Anthony Spahr; Ting Zhang; Louise Loiselle; David Schramm; JoAnne Whittingham; Rene Gifford
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-10-05       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.